BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1693
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1693 (Perea)
          As Amended  August 19, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |75-1 |(April 21,      |SENATE: |29-0 |(August 21,    |
          |           |     |2014)           |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    U. & C.  

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (PUC) to issue a final decision on a general rate case of a  
          small independent telephone corporate within a specified  
          timeframe.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires the PUC to issue a final decision on a general rate  
            case of a small independent telephone corporation no later  
            than 330 days following the corporation's initial filing of  
            the general rate case application or advice letter.

          2)Establishes an interim rate period.  If the PUC fails to issue  
            a final decision by the 330th day, the rate design proposed by  
            the telephone corporation will take effect on an interim basis  
            beginning 360 calendar days following the filing of the  
            application or advice letter.  This interim rate is subject to  
            an accounting true-up in the final decision, if the decision  
            is issued within 540 days of filing.  If the decision is not  
            issued within 540 days, the interim rate will be in place  
            until the PUC issues a final decision and will not be subject  
            to an accounting true-up.

          3)Requires any new rate design adopted in a final decision or  
            resolution issued by the PUC after the 540-day period to take  
            effect prospectively.

          4)Allows the required timeframes to be waived by mutual consent  
            of the executive director of the PUC and the telephone  
            corporation.

          The Senate amendments

          1)Requires the PUC to issue its final decision on a general rate  
            case of a small independent telephone corporation no later  








                                                                  AB 1693
                                                                  Page  2

            than 390 days following the corporation's initial filing of  
            the general rate case application or advice letter.

          2)Allows the interim rate period, if the PUC fails to issue a  
            final decision, to begin 420 days following the filing of the  
            application or advice letter.

          3)Allows the interim rate period to become final, effective as  
            of the 420th day, if the PUC fails to issue a decision with  
            540 days.

          4)Specifies the dates for which the bill's provisions shall  
            become applicable to a general rate case that is pending on  
            January 1, 2015.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, minor and absorbable costs to the Public Utilities  
          Reimbursement Account (special) to the CPUC to decrease the time  
          to complete GRCs [general rate cases] for small independent  
          telephone companies.
           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Until recently, the PUC  
          routinely processed small rural telephone corporation rate cases  
          within a year of filing.  However, the latest telephone company  
          rate case has experienced unreasonable delays with the PUC  
          taking almost two years to final decide to stay the telephone  
          company's rate case, likely for another year or longer.  The  
          longer the PUC takes to complete a ratemaking case, the more  
          costly it becomes for the telephone company since the new rates  
          do not go into effect until they are approved by the full  
          Commission and they are not retroactive.  Small telephone  
          companies need their rate cases addressed within a reasonable  
          period so they are able to plan for investments in  
          infrastructure upgrades to make service better for their  
          customers."

          Background:  Currently, there are approximately 10 small  
          independent telephone corporations which primarily serve  
          customers in rural areas of the state and are subject to PUC  
          regulation. This means they cannot change any rate without PUC  
          review and approval. The companies are:  Calaveras Telephone,  
          Cal-Ore Telephone, Ducor Telephone, Sebastian dba Foresthill  
          Telephone and Kerman Telephone, Pinnacles Telephone, Ponderosa  
          Telephone, Sierra Telephone, and Siskiyou Telephone, and TDS  
          Telecom.  









                                                                  AB 1693
                                                                  Page  3

          Two channels exist for the submission of rate cases by small  
          independent telephone corporations, one "formal" and the other  
          "informal."  The formal process involves the submission of an  
          application, which opens a formal PUC proceeding to address the  
          case.  Formal cases are subject to the PUCs procedural rules  
          governing rate setting proceedings, including ex parte  
          restrictions, scoping procedures, and the process for  
          preparation and consideration of a proposed decision.   
          Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) preside over formal cases and  
          the process is guided by an Assigned Commissioner.  Formal cases  
          involve the preparation of testimony and a formal evidentiary  
          hearing in which that testimony can be tested through  
          appropriate cross-examination.  Typically, the PUCs Office of  
          Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) intervenes in a formal rate case to  
          represent the ratepayer viewpoint.  ORA provides a formal  
          protest, conducts discovery, submits testimony, and participates  
          in the evidentiary hearing as an independent party.  Formal  
          cases are sometimes resolved through settlements between the  
          company and ORA, but any settlement must be approved by the PUC  
          before it can take effect.  Ultimately, formal cases generate a  
          PUC Decision that concludes the case and either adopts the  
          company's proposed relief, denies relief, or adopts the relief  
          in part.
           
          Informal cases are initiated by advice letter, and are processed  
          by the PUCs Communications Division.  There is no proceeding for  
          the informal process and no official procedural events.   
          Informal cases involve significant data requests and review by  
          Communications Division staff and the preparation of a Draft  
          Resolution that is ultimately considered by the PUC for adoption  
          as a Final Resolution.  There is no ALJ or Assigned  
          Commissioner, no ex parte restrictions, no scoping limitations,  
          no testimony, and no hearing in an informal case.
           
          Both types of cases involve the same exact questions regarding  
          revenue requirement and rate design.  They are different only in  
          the procedure that is followed.  Historically, informal and  
          formal rate cases have both taken approximately one year to  
          complete. 


           Analysis Prepared by  :    DaVina Flemings / U. & C. / (916)  
          319-2083 










                                                                  AB 1693
                                                                  Page  4

                                                               FN: 0005097