BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1699
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1699 (Bloom)
          As Amended  May 20, 2014
          Majority vote 

           NATURAL RESOURCES   6-3         ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY             
          5-2                             
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chesbro, Garcia,          |Ayes:|Alejo, Bloom, Gomez,      |
          |     |Muratsuchi, Skinner,      |     |Lowenthal, Ting           |
          |     |Stone, Williams           |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Grove, Bigelow, Patterson |Nays:|Dahle, Donnelly           |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford,                 |     |                          |
          |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |     |                          |
          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Holden,    |     |                          |
          |     |Pan, Quirk,               |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Weber      |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Bigelow, Donnelly, Jones, |     |                          |
          |     |Linder, Wagner            |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits the sale of "cleaning products or personal  
          care products" that contain very small plastic particles  
          (microplastic).  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Defines terms used in this bill, including: 

             a)   "Personal care products" as mixtures and solutions used  
               for bathing and cleaning, including, but not limited to,  
               hand and body soaps, exfoliates, shampoos, toothpastes, and  
               scrubs.  

             b)   "Microplastic" as any plastic particles that are five  








                                                                  AB 1699
                                                                  Page  2


               millimeters or less in all dimensions.  

             c)   "Person" as an individual, trust, firm, joint stock  
               company, corporation, company, partnership, limited  
               liability company, or association; and, defines "person in  
               the course of doing business" as excluding any person  
               employing fewer than 10 employees and local, state, and  
               federal government entities.   

          2)Beginning January 1, 2019, prohibits a person in the course of  
            doing business from selling or offering for sale any cleaning  
            products, personal care products, or both that contain  
            microplastic.  Specifies that this provision does not apply to  
            products that contain microplastic in an amount less than one  
            part per million. 

          3)Establishes enforcement provisions, including civil penalties  
            not to exceed $2,500 per day for each violation, as specified.  
             Authorizes the Attorney General, a district attorney, a city  
            attorney, or a city prosecutor to enforce the requirements of  
            this bill.  

          4)Specifies that penalties collected be retained by the office  
            that brought the action.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Under the federal Marine Plastic Pollution Research and  
            Control Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-220, Title II) prohibits  
            the at-sea disposal of plastic and other solid materials for  
            all navigable waters within the United States (U.S.).  The law  
            also requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the  
            National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S.  
            Coast Guard to jointly conduct a public education program on  
            the marine environment.

          2)Under the federal Clean Water Act requires the state to  
            identify a list of impaired water-bodies and develop and  
            implement Total Maximum Daily Loads for impaired water bodies.

          3)Under the Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act regulates  
            discharges of pollutants in storm water and urban runoff by  
            regulating, through the National Pollution Discharge  
            Elimination System, industrial discharges and discharges  








                                                                  AB 1699
                                                                 Page  3


            through the municipal storm drain systems. 

          4)Establishes the Preproduction Plastic Debris Program, which  
            requires the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and  
            regional boards to develop a program that requires plastic  
            manufacturing, handling, and transportation facilities to  
            implement best management practices to control discharges of  
            preproduction plastic pellets.  The program includes  
            inspections, stakeholder outreach efforts, and enforcement  
            activities.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill has negligible state costs.  This bill  
          provides for enforcement through civil penalties collected and  
          retained by the enforcing agency.

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)This bill.  According to the author:  

               Microplastic beads are sold in consumer products as  
               abrasives and exfoliants (such as in soaps, facial  
               scrubs, etc.)  In some products there are over 350,000  
               microbeads in one tube alone.  They are directly  
               washed down the drain and too small to be captured by  
               water treatment facilities.  Recent studies have shown  
               microbeads to be a pervasive marine pollutant, and  
               have been found in alarming quantities everywhere from  
               the garbage gyres in the Pacific Ocean to the Great  
               Lakes to the LA River.  Research has also shown that  
               these beads absorb toxins and are being ingested by  
               marine life, posing a threat to our marine ecosystems.  
                Currently there is no law banning their use in  
               consumer products.  While some larger companies such  
               as Unilever, Proctor & Gamble and Johnson & Johnson  
               have pledged to phase microbeads out of their products  
               and replace them with natural alternatives, the  
               proposed phase out dates range all over the place and  
               in some cases are only 50% by a certain date, etc.   
               Our bill would provide a hard phase out date to ensure  
               that plastic microbeads from personal care products  
               are no longer entering our waters.

          2)Plastic in the marine environment.  Plastics are estimated to  








                                                                  AB 1699
                                                                  Page  4


            compose 60% to 80% of all marine debris and 90% of all  
            floating debris.  Due to the interplay of ocean currents,  
            marine debris tends to accumulate in certain areas of the  
            ocean.  The North Pacific Central Gyre is where much of the  
            marine debris originating in California ends up.  This area of  
            the Pacific has been referred to as the "Garbage Patch" or the  
            "Pacific Trash Vortex" because of the significant quantities  
            of plastic that have accumulated there. 

            Preproduction plastic is the raw plastic resin pellets that  
            are molded into finished plastic products.  These small  
            pellets, also called "nurdles," are generally one to five  
            millimeters in size, but can also be powder, granule, or  
            flake.  Preproduction plastic are discharged into stormwater  
            during improper handling.  Their small size makes them  
            difficult to clean up and manage.  Prior to the state's  
            Preproduction Plastic Debris Program, some plastic  
            manufacturing facilities were simply sweeping or hosing  
            spilled pellets into storm drains.  

            Microplastic, generally referred to microbeads by product  
            manufacturers, is small plastic pellets that are added to  
            personal care and cleaning products as exfoliants and  
            abrasives.  Unlike other forms of plastic pollution,  
            microplastic in personal care and cleaning products are  
            designed to be washed down the drain.  Wastewater treatment  
            systems are not capable of capturing these small particles,  
            and they pass directly into the state's waterways and  
            eventually to the ocean.  Biodegradable alternatives that do  
            not contribute to marine debris exist and are widely used by  
            some product manufacturers, including ground apricot shells  
            and cocoa beans.  

            Most plastic marine debris is comprised of very small plastic  
            particles.  In addition to nurdles and other forms of small  
            plastic particles, larger plastic debris breaks down into  
            smaller and smaller pieces as it degrades.  According to  
            SWRCB, research indicates that plastic in the ocean may never  
            fully degrade into naturally occurring compounds.  These  
            plastic pieces resemble food to marine animals.  Small pieces  
            are confused with small fish, plankton, or krill.  Plastic  
            bags can be mistaken for jellyfish, especially by sea turtles.  
             Plastic has been proven to negatively affect at least 663  
            animal species worldwide, including all known species of sea  








                                                                  AB 1699
                                                                  Page  5


            turtles, half of all marine mammal species, and one-fifth of  
            all species of seabirds.  

            In addition to the physical impacts of plastic pollution,  
            hydrophobic chemicals present in the ocean in trace amounts  
            (e.g., from contaminated runoff and oil and chemical spills)  
            have an affinity for, and bind to, plastic particles.  These  
            chemicals include bisphenol A, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane  
            (DDT), and chemical flame retardants.  The plastic particles  
            are consumed by marine animals where they enter and accumulate  
            in the food chain.

          3)Microplastic in personal care products.  Alternatives to  
            plastic microbeads are commonly used in personal care  
            products, such as ground fruit pits and seeds, cocoa beans,  
            rice, sugar, and salt.  While some opponents argue that these  
            components don't offer the same scrubbing feeling or  
            hypoallergenic properties as microbeads, many major  
            manufacturers are already voluntarily phasing out  
            microplastics and using these or other alternatives.  For  
            example, Colgate-Palmolive's Web site states, "We recognize  
            that consumers have questions and are reformulating with  
            alternate ingredients the small number of our products  
            containing microplastics.  Much of this work has already been  
            accomplished, and the process will be completed by 2014."   
            Unilever's Web site states, "Unilever has decided to phase out  
            plastic scrub beads from personal care products.  This is  
            because we believe we can provide consumers with products that  
            deliver a similar exfoliating performance without the need to  
            use plastics.  We expect to complete this phase out globally  
            by 2015."  Johnson & Johnson, L'Oreal, and Proctor & Gamble  
            have also committed to eliminating the use of microplastics in  
            their products.

          4)Other state actions.  Several other states are currently  
            considering legislation on microplastics, including Illinois,  
            Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio.  The New  
            York bills, Senate Bill 7018 (Grisanti) and Assembly Bill 8744  
            (Sweeney, et al.), would prohibit the production, manufacture,  
            sale, or offering for sale of any personal care product that  
            contains intentionally added microbeads beginning on December  
            31, 2015.  SB 2727 (Steans), which is being considered in  
            Illinois, would prohibit the manufacture for sale of a  
            personal care product that contains synthetic plastic  








                                                                  AB 1699
                                                                  Page  6


            microbeads beginning on December 31, 2017, and would prohibit  
            a person from accepting for sale a personal care product that  
            contains synthetic plastic microbeads beginning on December  
            31, 2018.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Elizabeth MacMillan / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092 


                                                                FN: 0003548