AB 1725, as introduced, Maienschein. Mental health: conservatorship hearings for the gravely disabled.
Existing law provides a procedure for the appointment of a conservator for a person who is determined to be gravely disabled as a result of a mental disorder or an impairment by chronic alcoholism and requires an officer, including a county public guardian or a county mental health program, to conduct a conservatorship investigation. Under existing law, a professional person in charge of an agency providing comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive treatment for a gravely disabled person may recommend a conservatorship for that person. Existing law requires the officer providing conservatorship investigation, when he or she concurs with the recommendation, to petition the superior court in the patient’s county of residence for a conservatorship.
This bill would include a person who is gravely disabled as a result of substance abuse as a person for whom a conservatorship may be requested and granted. This bill would also provide a procedure for a family member or interested person who believes a conservatorship is necessary to petition the probate court to establish a conservatorship, as specified. This bill would also authorize the court, after a hearing, to recommend a conservatorship to the officer providing conservatorship investigation when the court, in a conservatorship established under the Probate Code, determines that a person, for whom a conservatorship has been established under the Probate Code, may be gravely disabled as a result of a mental disorder or impairment by chronic alcoholism or substance abuse and is unwilling to accept, or incapable of accepting treatment voluntarily. This bill would require the officer providing conservatorship investigation to file a copy of his or her report with the court within 30 days of the court’s recommendation.
By expanding the duties of the county officer providing conservatorship investigation, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 5350.2 of the Welfare and Institutions
2Code is amended to read:
Reasonable attempts shall be made by the county
4mental health programbegin insert, or the petitioning party,end insert to notify family
5members or any other person designated by the person for whom
6conservatorship is sought, of the time and place of the
7conservatorship hearing. The person for whom the conservatorship
8is sought shall be advised by the facility treating the person that
9he or she may request that information about the time and place
10of the conservatorship hearing not be given to family members,
11in those circumstances where the proposed conservator is not a
12family member. The request shall be honored by the mental health
13program. Neither this section nor Section 5350 shall be interpreted
14to allow the proposed
conservatee to request that any proposed
15conservator not be advised of the time and place of the
16conservatorship hearing.
Section 5352 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is
2amended to read:
begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insert When the professional person in charge of an agency
4providing comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing
5intensive treatment determines that a person in hisbegin insert or herend insert care is
6gravely disabled as a result of mental disorder or impairmentbegin delete by begin insert by chronic alcoholismend insertbegin insert
or substance abuseend insert and
7chronic alcoholismend delete
8is unwilling to accept, or incapable of accepting, treatment
9voluntarily, hebegin insert
or sheend insert may recommend conservatorship to the
10officer providing conservatorship investigation of thebegin insert person’send insert
11 county of residencebegin delete of the personend delete prior tobegin delete his admissionend deletebegin insert admitting
12him or herend insert as a patient inbegin delete suchend deletebegin insert theend insert facility.
13The
end delete
14begin insert(b)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertThe end insertprofessional person in charge of an agency providing
15comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive
16treatment may recommend conservatorship for a person without
17the person being an inpatient inbegin delete suchend deletebegin insert theend insert facility, if both of the
18following conditions are met: begin delete(a) theend delete
19begin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTheend insert
professional person or another professional person
20designated by himbegin insert or herend insert has examined and evaluated the person
21and determined that hebegin insert or sheend insert is gravelybegin delete disabled; (b) theend deletebegin insert disabled.end insert
22begin insert (2)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTheend insert
professional person or another professional person
23designated by himbegin insert or herend insert has determined that future examination
24on an inpatient basis is not necessary for a determination that the
25person is gravely disabled.
26If
end delete
27begin insert(c)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertIf end insertthe officer providing conservatorship investigation concurs
28with the recommendationbegin insert of the professional personend insert, hebegin insert or sheend insert
29 shall petition the superior court in thebegin insert
patient’send insert
countybegin delete of residence to establish conservatorship.begin insert If the officer providing
30of the patientend delete
31conservatorship investigation does not initiate conservatorship
32proceedings, but a family member or interested person believes a
33conservatorship is necessary, the family member or interested
34person may petition the Probate Court under this chapter for the
35establishment of a conservatorship if the following conditions have
36been met:end insert
37(1) The professional person in charge of an agency providing
38comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive
39treatment has examined and evaluated the person and determined
40that he or she is gravely disabled as a result of a mental
disorder
P4 1or impairment by chronic alcoholism or substance abuse and is
2unwilling to accept, or incapable of accepting, voluntary treatment.
3(2) The professional person has recommended a conservatorship
4to the officer providing conservatorship investigation in the county
5of residence.
6(3) The officer providing the investigation has made a report,
7but declines to initiate conservatorship proceedings.
8(d) (1) The court, after a hearing, may recommend a
9conservatorship under this chapter to the officer providing
10conservatorship investigation of the person’s county of residence
11when the court in a conservatorship established under the Probate
12Code determines that a person, for whom a conservatorship has
13been established under the Probate Code, may be gravely disabled
14as a result of a mental disorder
or impairment by chronic
15alcoholism or substance abuse and is unwilling to accept, or
16incapable of accepting treatment voluntarily.
17(2) Within 30 days after the recommendation, the officer
18providing conservatorship investigation shall file a copy of his or
19her report with the court making the recommendation in the
20Probate conservatorship.
21Where
end delete
22begin insert(e)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertWhere end inserttemporary conservatorship is indicated,begin delete theend deletebegin insert
thatend insert fact
23shall be alternatively pleaded in the petition. The officer providing
24conservatorship investigation or other county officer or employee
25designated by the county shall act as the temporary conservator.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
27this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
28local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
29pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
304 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
99