BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1732
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 30, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 1732 (Stone) - As Amended: April 10, 2014
Policy Committee: B & PVote:14-0
(Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill makes minor modifications to provisions governing the
advertising of motor vehicle sales. Specifically, this bill:
1)Prohibits a licensed vehicle manufacturer, transporter or
dealer from advertising a vehicle's prior use or ownership
history in an inaccurate manner.
2)Allows a licensed dealer to use the word "rebate" or similar
words in advertising the sale of a vehicle if the rebate is
offered to the retail purchaser by a finance company
affiliated with a vehicle manufacturer or distributor, a
regulated utility, or a government entity.
3)Prohibits a licensed dealer from advertising a rebate
deduction that conflicts with another advertised rebate
deduction.
FISCAL EFFECT
Any costs to DMV would minor and absorbable.
COMMENTS
Purpose . According to the sponsor, the California New Car
Dealers Association, this bill makes three changes in vehicle
advertising law.
First, the limitation that dealers can only advertise rebates
offered by vehicle manufacturers or distributor would be
expanded to allow dealers to advertise rebates offered by a
AB 1732
Page 2
finance company affiliated with the manufacturer or distributor,
a regulated utility or a government entity. This change is
intended to permit dealers to advertise other rebate programs
such as the 'Clean Vehicle Rebate Program' or 'Cash for
Clunkers'.
Second, the bill codifies existing regulations requiring that
express advertisements of a vehicle's prior use or ownership
history must be accurate. The sponsor states that this
particular regulation is largely unknown and that its
codification would help ensure compliance.
Third, the bill clarifies that a dealer may not advertise a
rebate deduction if it conflicts with another advertised
deduction. The sponsor states that this change is necessary
because of confusion among dealers and law enforcement as to how
a conflicting rebate would be enforced.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081