BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �







                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
                            Senator Loni Hancock, Chair              A
                             2013-2014 Regular Session               B

                                                                     1
                                                                     7
                                                                     4
          AB 1743 (Ting)                                             3
          As Amended May 27, 2014
          Hearing date:  June 24, 2014
          Business and Professions; Health and Safety Codes
          JM:mc

                                  SALES OF SYRINGES  

                                       HISTORY

          Source:  Drug Policy Alliance; San Francisco AIDS Foundation 

          Prior Legislation: SB 41 (Yee) - Ch. 738, Stats. 2011
                       AB 1701 (Chesbro) - Ch. 667, Stats. 2010
                       AB 110 (Laird) - Ch. 707, Stats. 2007
                       AB 547 (Berg) - Ch. 692, Stats. 2005
                       SB 1159 (Vasconcellos) - Ch. 608, Stats. 2004
                       AB 136 (Mazzoni) - Ch. 762, Stats. 1999

          Support:  A New PATH; American Civil Liberties Union of  
                    California; California Association of Alcohol and Drug  
                    Program Executives; California Communities United  
                    Institute; California Conference of Local AIDS  
                    Directors; California Medical Association; California  
                    Nurses Association; California Pharmacists  
                    Association; California Primary Care Association;  
                    California Public Defenders Association; California  
                    Retailers Association; California Society of Addiction  
                    Medicine; California Society of Health-System  
                    Pharmacists; Center for Living and Learning; City and  
                    County of San Francisco; County Alcohol and Drug  
                    Program Administrators Association of California;  
                    Dolores Street Community Services; Drug Policy  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageB

                    Alliance; Friends Committee on Legislation of  
                    California; HealthRIGHT 360; Homeless Health Care Los  
                    Angeles; Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors; Los  
                    Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center; National Association  
                    of Social Workers, California Chapter; National Viral  
                    Hepatitis Roundtable; Planned Parenthood Affiliates of  
                    California; San Francisco HIV/AIDS Provider Network;  
                    San Francisco Medical Society; Tarzana Treatment  
                    Centers, Inc.; Transgender Law Center; UCSF Alliance  
                    Health Project; University of California, San Diego;  
                    California Mental Health Directors Association


          Opposition:None known

          Assembly Floor Vote:  Ayes 45 - Noes 28


                                         KEY ISSUE
           
          SHOULD THE LIMIT OF 30 OR FEWER SYRINGES AND HYPODERMIC NEEDLES A  
          PHARMACIST MAY SELL TO AN ADULT IN A SINGLE TRANSACTION, AND THE  
          SAME LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF SYRINGES AND NEEDLES A PERSON MAY OBTAIN  
          FROM A SPECIFIED SOURCE BE REPEALED UNTIL 2021?



                                       PURPOSE

          The purpose of this bill is to repeal until 2021 the provision  
          that limits the number of syringes and hypodermic needles a  
          pharmacist or physician may sell to an adult purchaser to 30 or  
          fewer devices; and 2) to extend to 2021 the requirement that a  
          pharmacist provide written or oral counseling to a purchaser of  
          syringes and hypodermic needles. 

           Existing law  permits a pharmacist or physicians to furnish up to  
          30 hypodermic needles and syringes for human use, without a  
          prescription or local government authorization, to a person 18  
          years or older until January 1, 2015.  (Bus. & Prof. Code  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageC

          �4145.5, subd. (b).)

           Existing law  permits a person without a prescription or license  
          to obtain up to 30 hypodermic needles and syringes from a  
          physician, pharmacist or hypodermic needle and exchange program  
          solely for personal use until January 1, 2015.  (Health & Saf.  
          Code � 11364.1, subd. (c).)

           Existing law requires pharmacies that furnish non-prescription  
          syringes to provide written information or verbal counseling to  
          consumers at the time of furnishing or sale of non-prescription  
          hypodermic needles or syringes on how to access drug treatment  
          and testing and treatment for HIV and hepatitis C, and how to  
          safely dispose of sharps waste.  (Bus. & Prof. Code � 4145.5,  
          subd. (f).)  

           Existing law  permits, until January 1, 2015, a city or county to  
          authorize a licensed pharmacist to sell or furnish up to 10  
          hypodermic needles or syringes to a person for human use without  
          a prescription if the pharmacy is registered with a local health  
          jurisdiction in disease prevention demonstration projects  
          (DPDP).  (Bus. & Prof. Code � 4145.)

           This bill  deletes the limit on the number of syringes a  
          pharmacist or physician may provide to an adult without a  
          prescription and extends, until January 1, 2021, the statewide  
          authorization for pharmacists to sell syringes without a  
          prescription.
           This bill  deletes the limit on the number of syringes and  
          needles a person may possess, when the items are obtained from a  
          pharmacist, physician, needle exchange program or any other  
          lawful source, and extends this authorization until January 1,  
          2021.    

           This bill  directs pharmacists and needle exchange programs to  
          counsel persons obtaining needles and syringes on safe disposal,  
          in addition to the existing requirement that they provide for  
          safe disposal.

                    RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageD


          For the last several years, severe overcrowding in California's  
          prisons has been the focus of evolving and expensive litigation  
          relating to conditions of confinement.  On May 23, 2011, the  
          United States Supreme Court ordered California to reduce its  
          prison population to 137.5 percent of design capacity within two  
          years from the date of its ruling, subject to the right of the  
          state to seek modifications in appropriate circumstances.   

          Beginning in early 2007, Senate leadership initiated a policy to  
          hold legislative proposals which could further aggravate the  
          prison overcrowding crisis through new or expanded felony  
          prosecutions.  Under the resulting policy, known as "ROCA"  
          (which stands for "Receivership/ Overcrowding Crisis  
          Aggravation"), the Committee held measures that created a new  
          felony, expanded the scope or penalty of an existing felony, or  
          otherwise increased the application of a felony in a manner  
          which could exacerbate the prison overcrowding crisis.  Under  
          these principles, ROCA was applied as a content-neutral,  
          provisional measure necessary to ensure that the Legislature did  
          not erode progress towards reducing prison overcrowding by  
          passing legislation, which would increase the prison population.  
            

          In January of 2013, just over a year after the enactment of the  
          historic Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, the State of  
          California filed court documents seeking to vacate or modify the  
          federal court order requiring the state to reduce its prison  
          population to 137.5 percent of design capacity.  The State  
          submitted that the, ". . .  population in the State's 33 prisons  
          has been reduced by over 24,000 inmates since October 2011 when  
          public safety realignment went into effect, by more than 36,000  
          inmates compared to the 2008 population . . . , and by nearly  
          42,000 inmates since 2006 . . . ."  Plaintiffs opposed the  
          state's motion, arguing that, "California prisons, which  
          currently average 150% of capacity, and reach as high as 185% of  
          capacity at one prison, continue to deliver health care that is  
          constitutionally deficient."  In an order dated January 29,  
          2013, the federal court granted the state a six-month extension  
          to achieve the 137.5 % inmate population cap by December 31,  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageE

          2013.  

          The Three-Judge Court then ordered, on April 11, 2013, the state  
          of California to "immediately take all steps necessary to comply  
          with this Court's . . . Order . . . requiring defendants to  
          reduce overall prison population to 137.5% design capacity by  
          December 31, 2013."  On September 16, 2013, the State asked the  
          Court to extend that deadline to December 31, 2016.  In  
          response, the Court extended the deadline first to January 27,  
          2014, and then February 24, 2014, and ordered the parties to  
          enter into a meet-and-confer process to "explore how defendants  
          can comply with this Court's June 20, 2013, Order, including  
          means and dates by which such compliance can be expedited or  
          accomplished and how this Court can ensure a durable solution to  
          the prison crowding problem."

          The parties were not able to reach an agreement during the  
          meet-and-confer process.  As a result, the Court ordered  
          briefing on the State's requested extension and, on February 10,  
          2014, issued an order extending the deadline to reduce the  
          in-state adult institution population to 137.5% design capacity  
          to February 28, 2016.  The order requires the state to meet the  
          following interim and final population reduction benchmarks:

                 143% of design bed capacity by June 30, 2014;
                 141.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2015; and,
                 137.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2016. 

          If a benchmark is missed the Compliance Officer (a position  
          created by the February 10, 2016 order) can order the release of  
          inmates to bring the State into compliance with that benchmark.   


          In a status report to the Court dated May 15, 2014, the state  
          reported that as of May 14, 2014, 116,428 inmates were housed in  
          the State's 34 adult institutions, which amounts to 140.8% of  
          design bed capacity, and 8,650 inmates were housed in  
          out-of-state facilities.   

          The ongoing prison overcrowding litigation indicates that prison  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageF

          capacity and related issues concerning conditions of confinement  
          remain unresolved.  While real gains in reducing the prison  
          population have been made, even greater reductions may be  
          required to meet the orders of the federal court.  Therefore,  
          the Committee's consideration of ROCA bills -bills that may  
          impact the prison population - will be informed by the following  
          questions:

                 Whether a measure erodes realignment and impacts the  
               prison population;
                 Whether a measure addresses a crime which is directly  
               dangerous to the physical safety of others for which there  
               is no other reasonably appropriate sanction; 
                 Whether a bill corrects a constitutional infirmity or  
               legislative drafting error; 
                 Whether a measure proposes penalties which are  
               proportionate, and cannot be achieved through any other  
               reasonably appropriate remedy; and,
                 Whether a bill addresses a major area of public safety  
               or criminal activity for which there is no other  
               reasonable, appropriate remedy.

                                      COMMENTS

          1.  Need for This Bill  

          According to the author: 

               Sharing used syringes remains the most common mode of  
               hepatitis C transmission, and the second most common  
               cause of HIV and hepatitis B transmission in the  
               United States and California.  These diseases are  
               costly and potentially deadly.  The California Medical  
               Association, the California Nurses Association, and  
               the California Board of Pharmacies agree that safe and  
               legal syringe access through pharmacies is a key  
               component to the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS  
               and hepatitis B & C.  The United Nations AIDS  
               Foundation and the World Health Organization have  
               found that very high or no caps on the amount of  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageG

               syringes an adult can purchase are associated with  
               less syringe sharing.  Current law provides  
               pharmacists the discretion to sell up to 30 syringes  
               to an adult without a prescription.  This law will  
               sunset on January 1, 2015, and without an extension of  
               the law, pharmacists in only 15 counties and 4 cities  
               will maintain the ability to sell syringes over the  
               counter.  AB 1743 extends the sunset date in existing  
               law for six years and removes the cap on the number of  
               syringes an adult can purchase.  By doing so,  
               California will use evidenced-based strategies to  
               prevent thousands of potentially deadly infections at  
               no cost to the taxpayers.

          2.  Consistent Statewide Policy on Syringe and Needle  
          Distribution and Possession  

          Existing law includes a number of provisions regulating how  
          syringes and needles are distributed without a prescription.   
          The statutes demonstrate the development of the issue and the  
          law.  The first statutes were pilot projects, with relatively  
          strict limits on the number of syringes that could be  
          distributed without a prescription.  The first programs were  
          subject to relatively short-term county approval, requiring  
          advocates to seek renewal on a regular basis.  More recently,  
          the law authorized pharmacists and physicians to distribute up  
          to 30 needles and syringes.  Some of the laws overlap and even  
          contradict each other,<1> perhaps creating confusion and  
          uncertainty about what practices are allowed.

          This bill will create a statewide standard for both the  
          distribution of needles and syringes and a parallel provision  
          concerning persons who obtain and possess needles and syringes.   
          This could be helpful to persons who are not sure if they must  
          operate under a county-approved program or another law.  This  
          bill does, however, include a January 1, 2021 sunset to allow  
          ---------------------------
          <1> The statutes concerning local government approval still  
          appear in the law.  However, Business and Professions Code  
          Section 4149.5 provides that the authorization statutes are  
          inoperative through January 1, 2015.



                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageH

          the Legislature to evaluate how the law is working.  

          3.  Background on Syringe and Needle Availability and Disease  
            Prevention  

          California Department of Public Health (DPH) Office of AIDS  
          estimates that of the 117,553 persons reported to be living with  
          HIV/AIDS in California in 2012, 16.4 percent reported injection  
          drug use (IDU) as a risk factor, including approximately 9,672  
          men who reported both IDU and having sex with men as risk  
          factors.  The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  
          estimates that 50 to 90 percent of HIV-infected persons who use  
          injection drugs are also infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV).   
          IDU is the most commonly reported risk for HCV infection and is  
          the second most common risk factor for hepatitis B virus (HBV)  
          infection.  CDPH's Office of Viral Hepatitis Prevention  
          estimates that at least 60 percent of prevalent cases of HCV  
          infection in California are associated with IDU, and reports an  
          estimated 750,000 people living with hepatitis C in the state.   
          The long-term health consequences and costs associated with  
          hepatitis C and B are considerable.  The Office of Viral  
          Hepatitis Prevention reports that in 2010 alone there were more  
          than 30,000 hospitalizations in California for complications  
          related to HCV and HBV infection, at a cost of over 2.3 billion  
          dollars.  According to the CDC, each year in the U.S.  
          approximately 12,000 to 15,000 people die from HCV. 

          Public health experts, including the CDC, have identified access  
          to sterile syringes as one component of a comprehensive HIV  
          prevention strategy designed to reduce HIV transmission among  
          IDUs.  In the last 10 years, a number of national organizations  
          have endorsed deregulation to allow IDUs to purchase and possess  
          syringes and needles without a prescription, including the  
          American Medical Association, the American Pharmaceutical  
          Association, the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy  
          (NABP), the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS  
          Directors, and the Association of State and Territorial Health  
          Officials.  California is one of only five states having  
          statewide limitations on the purchase of syringes, according to  
          a 2014 survey by the NABP.  Although statewide sales are  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageI

          currently legal, there is a restriction as to the number.  

          4.  Disease Prevention Pilot Programs for Limited Syringe Sales  

          SB 1159 (Vasconcellos), Chapter 608, Statutes of 2004,  
          established a five-year pilot program to allow California  
          pharmacies, when authorized by a local government, to sell up to  
          10 syringes to adults without a prescription.  According to the  
          DPH Office of AIDS, 16 counties and four cities in California  
          authorized a DPDP (counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Humboldt,  
          Los Angeles, Mendocino, Marin, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo,  
          San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano,  
          Sonoma, Yolo, and Yuba; cities: Long Beach, Los Angeles,  
          Sacramento, and West Hollywood).  By February 2010, over 650  
          pharmacies were registered to participate in the program  
          (according to DPH, this is an estimate because some counties did  
          not keep fully accurate records, and some pharmacies  
          misunderstood DPDP requirements and sold syringes without first  
          registering with the local health jurisdiction [LHJ]).  

          According to an evaluation of DPDP published in July 2010 by  
          DPH, SB 1159 appeared to have the desired effect of augmenting  
          access to sterile syringes to prevent transmission of  
          blood-borne viral infections among IDUs without many of the  
          negative consequences that some had feared.  DPH's evaluation  
          suggests that counties authorizing over-the-counter (OTC) sale  
          of syringes without a prescription possess lower syringe sharing  
          levels among IDUs than counties that have not authorized OTC  
          sale.  Additionally, since implementation of SB 1159, fewer  
          clients presenting for testing for HIV at state-funded testing  
          sites report injecting illegal drugs, suggesting that  
          authorization of OTC syringe sales did not have the negative  
          impact of increased injection drug activity, a concern expressed  
          by some prior to authorization.  DPH's evaluation found that,  
          following implementation of SB 1159, accidental needle-stick  
          injury to law enforcement officers remained rare in California.   
          Between 2005 and 2009, post-authorization of DPDPs, 19  
          accidental needle-stick injuries were reported among law  
          enforcement in LHJs that had authorized DPDPs and 15 accidental  
          needle-stick injuries were reported among law enforcement in  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageJ

          LHJs that had not authorized DPDPs.  The variation in recent  
          years is not great enough to suggest a statistically significant  
          relationship to the authorization of DPDP.  DPH's evaluation  
          found no increase in unsafe discard of syringes since  
          implementation of SB 1159.  Finally, comparing time periods  
          prior to and following SB 1159 authorization, DPH found no  
          evidence of an increase in drug use or crime in the state of  
          California as a whole or in areas that authorized sale of  
          syringes without a prescription.  The overall findings are  
          consistent with those of other states that have transitioned, as  
          California has, from a complete prohibition on sale and  
          possession of syringes, to allowing a limited number to be sold  
          to adults.  The program was considered successful by the  
          localities that implemented it and the DPDP was suspended when  
          statewide sales were authorized by SB 41 (Yee), Chapter 738,  
          Statutes of 2011.  




























                                                                     (More)











          5.  Concise Descriptions of Prior Elated Legislation  

          SB 41 (Yee), Chapter 738, Statutes of 2011, permits syringe  
          sales of a maximum of 30 hypodermic needles or syringes to a  
          person without a prescription through licensed pharmacies  
          throughout the state until January 1, 2015 and makes inoperative  
          until that date, portions of the law establishing the DPDP.

          AB 1701 (Chesbro), Chapter 667, Statues of 2010, establishes,  
          indefinitely, the DPDP, permitting cities or counties to  
          authorize licensed pharmacists to sell or furnish 10 or fewer  
          hypodermic needles or syringes to a person for use without a  
          prescription, as specified.  

          SB 1029 (Yee) of 2010 contained similar provisions to those  
          contained in this bill, and was vetoed by Governor  
          Schwarzenegger who stated: When I signed legislation my first  
          year in office allowing for a pilot program to allow the sale of  
          syringes through participating counties and registered  
          pharmacies, I was seeking to balance the competing public  
          health, law enforcement and local control issues that this issue  
          requires.  I believe this balance was achieved and SB 1029 would  
          remove the ability of local officials to best determine policies  
          in their jurisdiction."  

          AB 110 (Laird), Chapter 707, Statutes of 2007, permits a public  
          entity that receives General Fund money from the Department of  
          Health Services (now DPH) for HIV prevention and education to  
          use that money to support needle exchange programs.  AB 1597  
          (Laird) of 2005 contained substantially similar provisions to AB  
          110, but was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.

          AB 547 (Berg), Chapter 692, Statutes of 2005, creates the Clean  
                                                     Needle and Syringe Exchange Program to permit needle exchange  
          programs without a local declaration of emergency. 

          AB 946 (Berg), of 2003 and AB 2871 (Berg) of 2004 would also  
          have repealed the requirement that a city or county authorize  
          its needle exchange program through a declaration of a local  




                                                                     (More)







                                                             AB 1743 (Ting)
                                                                      PageL

          emergency.  Both bills were vetoed by Governor Davis and  
          Governor Schwarzenegger, respectively.

          SB 774 (Vasconcellos), of 2003 and SB 1785 (Vasconcellos) of  
          2002 would have permitted the furnishing of syringes without a  
          prescription.  Both measures were vetoed by Governor Davis.

          AB 136 (Mazzoni), Chapter 762, Statutes of 1999, exempts public  
          entities and their agents and employees who distribute  
          hypodermic needles or syringes to participants in clean needle  
          and syringe exchange projects authorized by the public entity  
          pursuant to a declaration of a local emergency from criminal  
          prosecution. 


                                   ***************