AB 1744, as amended, Brown. California Department of Aging.
The Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act creates the California Department of Aging to provide leadership to the area agencies on aging in developing systems of home- and community-based services that maintain individuals in their own homes or least restrictive homelike environments. Existing law requires the department, in accomplishing its mission, to consider available data and population trends in developing programs and policies, collaborate with area agencies on aging, the California Commission on Aging, and other state and local agencies.
This bill would require the department to convene abegin delete joint study committee on family caregiving and long-term support servicesend deletebegin insert
blue-ribbon panel, comprised of at least 12 members, as specified, to make legislative recommendations to improve services for unpaid and family caregivers in Californiaend insert, as provided. The bill would require the committee to prepare a report of its findingsbegin insert and recommendationsend insert and provide it to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2016.begin insert The bill would make related findings and declarations.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertThis act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
2California Caregiver Act of 2014.end insert
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
end insertbegin insert
4(a) A caregiver can be any relative, partner, friend, or neighbor
5who has a significant relationship with, and who provides a broad
6range of assistance to, an older person or an adult with a chronic
7or disabling condition.
8(b) At present, there is no complete inventory of caregiving
9programs available to Californians performing unpaid caregiving
10services for an aging or disabled family member, friend, or
11neighbor.
12(c) Rising demand and shrinking families to provide caregiving
13support suggest that California needs a comprehensive person-
14and family-centered policy for long-term services and supports
15systems that would better serve the needs of older persons with
16disabilities, support family and friends in their caregiving roles,
17and promote greater efficiencies in public spending.
18(d) California ranked 30th out of 50 states and the District of
19Columbia on the 2011 State Long-Term Services and Supports
20Scorecard sponsored by the SCAN Foundation, American
21Association of Retired Persons (AARP), and the Commonwealth
22Fund.
23(e) Family support is a key driver in remaining in one’s home
24and community, but it comes at substantial costs to the caregivers,
25their families, and to society. If family caregivers were no longer
26available, the
economic cost to California’s health care and
27long-term services and supports systems would increase
28astronomically.
29(f) In 2009, approximately 4 million family caregivers in
30California provided care to an adult with limitations in daily
31activities at any given point in time, and over 5.8 million provided
32care at some time during the year.
33(g) In 2009, California’s family caregivers provided an
34estimated 3,850,000 hours of unpaid labor caring for their loved
P3 1ones. The estimated economic value of their unpaid contributions
2was approximately $47 billion.
3(h) In 2009, 59 percent of all family caregivers were employed
4full or part time. Family caregivers typically spend 20 hours a
5week caring for a family member who needs help with bathing,
6dressing, and other kinds of personal care, as well as household
7tasks such as
shopping and managing finances.
8(i) Nationally, 46 percent of family caregivers performed
9medical or nursing tasks for care recipients with multiple chronic
10physical and cognitive conditions. More than three-quarters of
11family caregivers who provided medical or nursing tasks were
12managing medications, including administering intravenous fluids
13and injections.
14(j) Almost one-half of family caregivers were administering five
15to nine prescription medications a day, and one in five was helping
16with 10 or more prescription medications a day. Yet, 61 percent
17of these caregivers reported that they trained themselves to perform
18medication management.
19(k) Only 31 percent of caregivers reported being visited at home
20by a health care professional. In addition, 27 percent of caregivers
21report that they have no additional
assistance from a family
22member, health care professional, or home health aide.
23(l) Nationally, more than 8 in 10 caregivers are over the age of
2450. Family caregivers are aging and are increasingly from diverse,
25social, racial, ethnic, and political backgrounds.
26(m) For many families in the midst of caregiving, there is deep
27worry and concern about the quality of care and quality of life.
28(n) Families do not know who to call or where to go to get the
29right kind of affordable help when they need it.
30(o) In just 13 years, as the baby boomers age into their 80s, the
31decline in the caregiver support ratio is projected to shift from a
32slow decline to a free fall in California.
33(p) To avoid
bankrupting our health and social service systems
34serving the elderly and persons with disabilities, it is imperative
35that California prepare by identifying strategies that will promote
36appropriate, person-centered services for families struggling with
37providing care to a family member.
38(q) It is in the interest of the state to better serve the
39approximately 4,000,000 families statewide who are currently
P4 1struggling to care for an aging or disabled family member, many
2of whom are also in the workforce.
3(r) There is an immense need for caregiving resources and
4services. As California’s population ages and as California
5becomes increasingly diverse, it is also in the interest of the state
6to adequately serve the following emerging caregiver populations:
7(1) Caregivers from the Black, Latino, Asian American, and
8Pacific
Islander communities.
9(2) Families of individuals with developmental disabilities.
end insertbegin insert
10(3) Persons who cannot access or are not eligible for existing
11caregiver support programs.
12(4) Non-English speakers, and ethnically and racially diverse
13populations that need caregiving programs to be provided in a
14culturally and linguistically appropriate manner.
15(5) Those in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
16community.
17(6) Rural residents.
end insert
begin insertSection 9104 is added to the end insertbegin insertWelfare and Institutions
19Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
(a) The department shall convene a blue-ribbon panel
21on family caregiving and long-term services and supports. The
22panel shall be jointly chaired by the director of the department or
23his or her designee and a representative of AARP California,
24except that all decisions regarding the expenditure of state funds
25shall be made by the department representative. The panel shall
26be comprised of at least 12 members who shall serve at the
27pleasure of the department and AARP, and shall include all of the
28following:
29(1) One person with experience in the field of academic research
30on caregiving.
31(2) One family caregiver for an adult with a chronic or disabling
32condition.
33(3) One representative of the mental health community.
34(4) One representative of the California caregiver resource
35centers.
36(5) One representative of the national Alzheimer’s Association.
37(6) One representative of an organization that provides
38community-based adult services.
39(7) One representative of an organization that provides an adult
40day program.
P5 1(8) One representative of an organization that provides services
2to caregivers.
3(9) One representative of an unpaid or family caregiver
4consumer organization.
5(10) One culturally and linguistically diverse caregiver.
6(11) One adult with a chronic or disabling condition who
7receives care from an unpaid caregiver or family member.
8(b) The blue-ribbon panel shall do all of the following:
9(1) Review the current policies and practices of state, local, and
10community programs available to caregivers of adults with chronic
11or disabling conditions, and consider how the needs of family
12caregivers should be assessed and addressed so that they can
13continue in their caregiving role without being overburdened.
14(2) Consider the recommendations of other state plans,
15including, but not limited to, the Olmstead Plan, the Long-Range
16Strategic Plan on Aging, the State
Plan for Alzheimer’s Disease,
17and the State Plan on Aging.
18(3) Compile an inventory of the resources available to family
19caregivers.
20(4) Determine gaps in services to family caregivers and identify
21barriers to participation in current programs.
22(5) Consider cultural and linguistic factors that impact
23caregivers and care recipients who are from diverse populations.
24(6) Consult with a broad range of stakeholders, including, but
25not limited to, people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, adults
26with disabling or chronic conditions, family caregivers,
27community-based and institutional providers, caregiving
28researchers and academicians, formal caregivers, the Caregiver
29Resource Centers, the California Commission on Aging, and other
30state entities.
31(7) Solicit testimony on the needs of family caregivers, including
32the designation of caregivers, training, respite services, medical
33leave policies, delegation of tasks to nonmedical aides, and other
34policies.
35(8) Identify best practices both in California and in other states.
36(9) Explore expanding those best practices in caregiving
37programs to populations that are not currently targeted.
38(10) Develop at least three legislative recommendations to
39improve the provision of services for unpaid and family caregivers
P6 1in California. These recommendations shall address all of the
2following:
3(A) Community-based support for California’s diverse
4population of caregivers for adults with chronic or
disabling
5conditions.
6(B) Choices for care and residence for persons with Alzheimer’s
7disease and their families.
8(C) The family caregiving competence of health care
9professionals.
10(11) Prepare and provide to the Legislature a report of its
11findings and recommendations on or before July 1, 2016.
12(12) Provide ongoing advice and assistance to the department
13and the Legislature as to the needs and priorities of unpaid and
14relative caregivers.
15(c) (1) Members shall serve without compensation, but shall
16receive reimbursement for travel and other necessary expenses
17actually incurred in the performance of their official duties.
18(2) The panel shall meet on a bimonthly basis.
19(3) All meetings of the panel shall be open to the public and
20adequate notice shall be provided in accordance with the
21Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with
22Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
23the Government Code).
24(d) (1) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
25paragraph (11) of subdivision (b) is inoperative on July 1, 2020,
26pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.
27(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (11) of
28subdivision (b) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795
29of the Government Code.
Section 9100 of the Welfare and Institutions Code
31 is amended to read:
(a) There is in the California Health and Human Services
33Agency, the California Department of Aging.
34(b) The department’s mission shall be to provide leadership to
35the area agencies on aging in developing systems of home- and
36community-based services that maintain individuals in their own
37homes or least restrictive homelike environments.
38(c) (1) In fulfilling its mission, the department shall develop
39minimum standards for service delivery to ensure that its programs
40meet consumer needs, operate in a cost-effective manner, and
P7 1preserve the independence and dignity of aging Californians. In
2accomplishing its
mission, the department shall consider available
3data and population trends in developing programs and policies,
4collaborate with area agencies on aging, the commission, and other
5state and local agencies, and consider the views of advocates,
6consumers and their families, and service providers.
7(2) The department shall report the Elder Economic Security
8Standard Index data for each service area in its state plan and use
9it as a reference when making decisions about allocating its existing
10resources, but only if the Elder Economic Security Standard Index
11is updated and made available to the department, and if the
12available public data used to calculate each Elder Economic
13Security Standard Index data element is calculated and updated
14for each California county and made available to the department
15in a format that displays each county’s
specific data.
16(d) (1) The department shall convene a joint study committee
17on family caregiving and long-term support services. The
18committee shall be jointly chaired by a representative of the
19department and a representative of AARP California, except that
20all decisions regarding the expenditure of state funds shall be made
21by the department representative. The committee shall be
22comprised of at least five members, of which at least one shall be
23a representative of an area agency on aging advisory council. The
24committee shall do all of the following:
25(A) Identify policies, resources, and programs available for
26family caregivers and encourage additional innovative and creative
27means to support family caregivers to continue to provide needed
28in-home
support for older adults.
29(B) Compile an inventory of the resources available to family
30caregivers.
31(C) Solicit testimony on the needs of family caregivers including
32the designation of caregivers, training, respite services, medical
33leave policies, delegation of tasks to nonmedical aids and other
34policies.
35(D) Prepare and provide to the Legislature a report of its findings
36on or before July 1, 2016.
37(2) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
38
paragraph (1) is inoperative on July 1, 2020, pursuant to Section
3910231.5 of the Government Code.
P8 1(3) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be
2submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
3Code.
4(e) The minimum standards for the department programs shall
5ensure that the system meets all of the following requirements:
6(1) Have the flexibility to respond to the needs of individuals
7and their families and caregivers.
8(2) Provide for consumer choice and self-determination.
9(3) Enable consumers to be involved in designing and
10monitoring the system.
11(4) Be equally accessible to diverse populations regardless of
12income, consistent with state and federal law.
13(5) Have consistent statewide policy, with local control and
14implementation.
15(6) Include preventive services and home- and community-based
16support.
17(7) Have cost containment and fiscal incentives consistent with
18the delivery of appropriate services at the appropriate level.
O
98