Amended in Assembly May 23, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 8, 2014

Amended in Assembly March 20, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1744


Introduced by Assembly Member Brown

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Atkins)

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Cooley, Levine,begin insert Waldron,end insert and Yamada)

February 14, 2014


An act to add Section 9104 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to aging.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1744, as amended, Brown. California Department of Aging.

The Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act creates the California Department of Aging to provide leadership to the area agencies on aging in developing systems of home- and community-based services that maintain individuals in their own homes or least restrictive homelike environments. Existing law requires the department, in accomplishing its mission, to consider available data and population trends in developing programs and policies, collaborate with area agencies on aging, the California Commission on Aging, and other state and local agencies.

This bill would require the departmentbegin insert, upon securing $200,000 in nonstate funds from private sources for purposes of implementing the bill,end insert to convene a blue-ribbon panel, comprised of at leastbegin delete 12end deletebegin insert 13end insert members, as specified, to make legislative recommendations to improve services for unpaid and family caregivers in California, as provided. The bill would require the committee to prepare a report of its findings and recommendations and provide it to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2016. The bill would make related findings and declarations.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
2California Caregiver Act of 2014.

3

SEC. 2.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

4(a) A caregiver can be any relative, partner, friend, or neighbor
5who has a significant relationship with, and who provides a broad
6range of assistance to, an older person or an adult with a chronic
7or disabling condition.

8(b) At present, there is no complete inventory of caregiving
9programs available to Californians performing unpaid caregiving
10services for an aging or disabled family member, friend, or
11neighbor.

12(c) Rising demand and shrinking families to provide caregiving
13support suggest that California needs a comprehensive person-
14and family-centered policy for long-term services and supports
15systems that would better serve the needs of older persons with
16disabilities, support family and friends in their caregiving roles,
17and promote greater efficiencies in public spending.

18(d) California ranked 30th out of 50 states and the District of
19Columbia on the 2011 State Long-Term Services and Supports
20Scorecard sponsored by the SCAN Foundation, American
21Association of Retired Persons (AARP), and the Commonwealth
22Fund.

23(e) Family support is a key driver in remaining in one’s home
24and community, but it comes at substantial costs to the caregivers,
25their families, and to society. If family caregivers were no longer
26available, the economic cost to California’s health care and
27long-term services and supports systems would increase
28astronomically.

29(f) In 2009, approximately 4 million family caregivers in
30California provided care to an adult with limitations in daily
P3    1activities at any given point in time, and over 5.8 million provided
2care at some time during the year.

3(g) In 2009, California’s family caregivers provided an estimated
43,850,000,000 hours of unpaid labor caring for their loved ones.
5The estimated economic value of their unpaid contributions was
6approximately $47 billion.

7(h) In 2009, 59 percent of all family caregivers were employed
8full or part time. Family caregivers typically spend 20 hours a
9week caring for a family member who needs help with bathing,
10dressing, and other kinds of personal care, as well as household
11tasks such as shopping and managing finances.

12(i) Nationally, 46 percent of family caregivers performed
13medical or nursing tasks for care recipients with multiple chronic
14physical and cognitive conditions. More than three-quarters of
15family caregivers who provided medical or nursing tasks were
16managing medications, including administering intravenous fluids
17and injections.

18(j) Almost one-half of family caregivers were administering
19five to nine prescription medications a day, and one in five was
20helping with 10 or more prescription medications a day. Yet, 61
21percent of these caregivers reported that they trained themselves
22to perform medication management.

23(k) Only 31 percent of caregivers reported being visited at home
24by a health care professional. In addition, 27 percent of caregivers
25report that they have no additional assistance from a family
26member, health care professional, or home health aide.

27(l) Nationally, more than 8 in 10 caregivers are overbegin delete theend deletebegin insert 50 years
28ofend insert
agebegin delete of 50end delete. Family caregivers are aging and are increasingly from
29diverse social, racial, ethnic, and political backgrounds.

30(m) For many families in the midst of caregiving, there is deep
31worry and concern about the quality of care and quality of life.

32(n) Families do not know who to call or where to go to get the
33right kind of affordable help when they need it.

34(o) In just 13 years, as the baby boomers age into their 80s, the
35decline in the caregiver support ratio is projected to shift from a
36slow decline to a free fall in California.

37(p) To avoid bankrupting our health and social service systems
38serving the elderly and persons with disabilities, it is imperative
39that California prepare by identifying strategies that will promote
P4    1appropriate, person-centered services for families struggling with
2providing care to a family member.

3(q) It is in the interest of the state to better serve the
4approximately 4,000,000 families statewide who are currently
5struggling to care for an aging or disabled family member, many
6of whom are also in the workforce.

7(r) There is an immense need for caregiving resources and
8services. As California’s population ages and as California becomes
9increasingly diverse, it is also in the interest of the state to
10adequately serve the following emerging caregiver populations:

11(1) Caregivers from the Black, Latino, Asian American, and
12Pacific Islander communities.

13(2) Families of individuals with developmental disabilities.

14(3) Persons who cannot access or are not eligible for existing
15caregiver support programs.

16(4) Non-English speakers, and ethnically and racially diverse
17populations that need caregiving programs to be provided in a
18culturally and linguistically appropriate manner.

19(5) Those in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
20community.

21(6) Rural residents.

22

SEC. 3.  

Section 9104 is added to the Welfare and Institutions
23Code
, to read:

24

9104.  

(a) The department shallbegin insert, upon securing two hundred
25thousand dollars ($200,000) of nonstate funds from private sources
26for the purpose of implementing this section,end insert
convene a blue-ribbon
27panel on family caregiving and long-term services and supports.
28The panel shall be jointly chaired by the director of the department
29or his or her designee and a representative elected by the members
30of the panel.begin delete All decisions regarding the expenditure of state funds
31shall be made by the department representative. Theend delete

32begin insert(b)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertTheend insert panel shall be comprised of at leastbegin delete 12 members,end deletebegin insert 13
33members,end insert
each of whom shall be representative of one or more of
34the following categories:

35(1) A person with experience in the field of academic research
36on caregiving.

37(2) A family caregiver for an adult with a chronic or disabling
38condition.

39(3) A representative of the mental health community.

40(4) A representative of the California caregiver resource centers.

P5    1(5) A representative of the national Alzheimer’s Association.

2(6) A representative of an organization that provides
3community-based adult services.

4(7) A representative of an organization that provides an adult
5day program.

6(8) A representative of an organization that provides services
7to caregivers.

8(9) A representative of an unpaid or family caregiver consumer
9organization.

10(10) A representative with expertise in and knowledge of the
11specific needs of culturally and linguistically diverse caregivers
12and the unique challenges of delivering services to family
13caregivers who face cultural or linguistic barriers.

14(11) An adult with a chronic or disabling condition who receives
15care from an unpaid caregiver or family member.

begin insert

16(12) A director or designated representative of an area agency
17on aging.

end insert
begin delete

18(b)

end delete

19begin insert(c)end insert The blue-ribbon panel shall do all of the following:

20(1) Review the current policies and practices of state, local, and
21community programs available to caregivers of adults with chronic
22or disabling conditions, and consider how the needs of family
23caregivers should be assessed and addressed so that they can
24continue in their caregiving role without being overburdened.

25(2) Consider the recommendations of other state plans,
26including, but not limited to, the Olmstead Plan, the Long-Range
27Strategic Plan on Aging, the State Plan for Alzheimer’s Disease,
28and the State Plan on Aging.

29(3) Compile an inventory of the resources available to family
30caregivers.

31(4) Determine gaps in services to family caregivers and identify
32barriers to participation in current programs.

33(5) Consider cultural and linguistic factors that impact caregivers
34and care recipients who are from diverse populations.

35(6) Consult with a broad range of stakeholders, including, but
36not limited to, people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, adults
37with disabling or chronic conditions, family caregivers,
38community-based and institutional providers, caregiving
39researchers and academicians, formal caregivers, the Caregiver
P6    1Resource Centers, the California Commission on Aging, and other
2state entities.

3(7) Solicit testimony on the needs of family caregivers, including
4the designation of caregivers, training, respite services, medical
5leave policies, delegation of tasks to nonmedical aides, and other
6policies.

7(8) Identify best practices both in California and in other states.

8(9) Explore expanding those best practices in caregiving
9programs to populations that are not currently targeted.

10(10) Develop at least three legislative recommendations to
11improve the provision of services for unpaid and family caregivers
12in California. These recommendations shall address all of the
13following:

14(A) Community-based support for California’s diverse
15population of caregivers for adults with chronic or disabling
16conditions.

17(B) Choices for care and residence for persons with Alzheimer’s
18disease and their families.

19(C) The family caregiving competence of health care
20professionals.

21(11) Prepare and provide to the Legislature a report of its
22findings and recommendations on or before July 1, 2016.

begin delete

23(12) Provide ongoing advice and assistance to the department
24and the Legislature as to the needs and priorities of unpaid and
25relative caregivers.

end delete
begin delete

26(c)

end delete

27begin insert(d)end insert (1) Members shall serve without compensation, but shall
28receive reimbursement for travel and other necessary expenses
29actually incurred in the performance of their official duties.

30(2) The panel shall meet on a bimonthly basis.

31(3) All meetings of the panel shall be open to the public and
32adequate notice shall be provided in accordance with the
33Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with
34Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
35the Government Code).

begin delete

36(d)

end delete

37begin insert(e)end insert (1) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
38paragraph (11) of subdivisionbegin delete (b)end deletebegin insert (c)end insert is inoperative on July 1, 2020,
39pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.

P7    1(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (11) of
2subdivisionbegin delete (b)end deletebegin insert (c)end insert shall be submitted in compliance with Section
39795 of the Government Code.



O

    96