Amended in Senate August 4, 2014

Amended in Assembly May 23, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 8, 2014

Amended in Assembly March 20, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1744


Introduced by Assembly Member Brown

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Atkins)

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Cooley, Levine, Waldron, and Yamada)

February 14, 2014


An act to addbegin insert and repealend insert Section 9104 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to aging.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1744, as amended, Brown. California Department of Aging.

The Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act creates the California Department of Aging to provide leadership to the area agencies on aging in developing systems of home- and community-based services that maintain individuals in their own homes or least restrictive homelike environments. Existing law requires the department, in accomplishing its mission, to consider available data and population trends in developing programs and policies, collaborate with area agencies on aging, the California Commission on Aging, and other state and local agencies.

This billbegin insert, until January 1, 2018,end insert would require the departmentbegin delete, upon securing $200,000 in nonstate funds from private sources for purposes of implementing the bill,end delete to convene a blue-ribbonbegin delete panel,end deletebegin insert task forceend insert comprised of at least 13 members, as specified, to make legislative recommendations to improve services for unpaid and family caregivers in California, as provided.begin insert The bill would condition this requirement upon the receipt of $200,000 in nonstate funds from private sources for purposes of implementing the bill.end insert The bill would require thebegin delete committeeend deletebegin insert task forceend insert to prepare a report of its findings and recommendations and provide it to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2016. The bill would make related findings and declarations.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
2California Caregiver Act of 2014.

3

SEC. 2.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

4(a) A caregiver can be any relative, partner, friend, or neighbor
5who has a significant relationship with, and who provides a broad
6range of assistance to, an older person or an adult with a chronic
7or disabling condition.

8(b) At present, there is no complete inventory of caregiving
9programs available to Californians performing unpaid caregiving
10services for an aging or disabled family member, friend, or
11neighbor.

12(c) Rising demand and shrinking families to provide caregiving
13support suggest that California needs a comprehensive person-
14and family-centered policy for long-term services and supports
15systems that would better serve the needs of older persons with
16disabilities, support family and friends in their caregiving roles,
17and promote greater efficiencies in public spending.

18(d) California rankedbegin delete 30thend deletebegin insert 24thend insert out of 50 states and the District
19of Columbia on thebegin delete 2011end delete State Long-Term Services and Supports
20Scorecard sponsored by the SCAN Foundation, American
21Association of Retired Persons (AARP), and the Commonwealth
22Fund.

23(e) Family support is a key driver in remaining in one’s home
24and community, but it comes at substantial costs to the caregivers,
25their families, and to society. If family caregivers were no longer
26available, the economic cost to California’s health care and
P3    1long-term services and supports systems would increase
2astronomically.

begin delete

3(f) In 2009, approximately

end delete

4begin insert(f)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertApproximatelyend insert 4 million family caregivers in California
5begin delete providedend deletebegin insert provideend insert care to an adult with limitations in daily activities
6at any given point in time, and over 5.8 millionbegin delete providedend deletebegin insert provideend insert
7 care at some time during thebegin delete year.end delete

8begin delete(g)end deletebegin deleteend deletebegin deleteIn 2009,end deletebegin insert year. In addition,end insert California’s family caregivers
9begin delete providedend deletebegin insert provideend insert an estimated 3,850,000,000 hours of unpaid labor
10caring for their loved ones. The estimated economic value of their
11unpaid contributionsbegin delete wasend deletebegin insert isend insert approximately $47 billion.

begin delete

12(h) In 2009, 59 percent

end delete

13begin insert(g)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertFifty-nine percentend insert of all family caregiversbegin delete wereend deletebegin insert areend insert employed
14full or part time. Family caregivers typically spend 20 hours a
15week caring for a family member who needs help with bathing,
16dressing, and other kinds of personal care, as well as household
17tasks such as shopping and managing finances.

begin delete

18(i)

end delete

19begin insert(h)end insert Nationally, 46 percent of family caregiversbegin delete performedend delete
20begin insert performend insert medical or nursing tasks for care recipients with multiple
21chronic physical and cognitive conditions. More than three-quarters
22of family caregivers whobegin delete providedend deletebegin insert provideend insert medical or nursing
23tasksbegin delete wereend deletebegin insert areend insert managing medications, including administering
24intravenous fluids andbegin delete injections.end delete

25begin delete(j)end deletebegin deleteend deletebegin deleteAlmost one-halfend deletebegin insert injections. Nearly halfend insert of family caregivers
26begin delete wereend deletebegin insert areend insert administering five to nine prescription medications a day,
27and one in fivebegin delete wasend deletebegin insert isend insert helping with 10 or more prescription
28medications a day. Yetbegin delete, 61 percent of theseend deletebegin insert mostend insert caregivers
29begin delete reportedend deletebegin insert reportend insert that they trained themselves to perform medication
30management.

begin delete

31(k)

end delete

32begin insert(i)end insert Only 31 percent of caregiversbegin delete reportedend deletebegin insert reportend insert being visited
33at home by a health care professional. begin deleteIn addition, 27 end deletebegin insertTwenty-seven end insert
34percent of caregivers report that they have no additional assistance
35from a family member, health care professional, or home health
36aide.

begin delete

37(l)

end delete

38begin insert(end insertbegin insertj)end insert Nationally, more than 8 in 10 caregivers are over 50 years
39of age. Family caregivers are aging and are increasingly from
40diverse social, racial, ethnic, and political backgrounds.begin insert As the
P4    1baby boomers age into their 80s, the decline in the caregiver
2support ratio is projected to shift from a slow decline to a free fall
3in California.end insert

begin delete

4(m)

end delete

5begin insert(k)end insert For many families in the midst of caregiving, there is deep
6worry and concern about the quality of care and quality ofbegin delete life.end delete

7begin delete(n)end deletebegin deleteend deletebegin deleteFamiliesend deletebegin insert life. Theyend insert do not know who to call or where to go
8to get the right kind of affordable help when they need it.

begin delete

9(o) In just 13 years, as the baby boomers age into their 80s, the
10decline in the caregiver support ratio is projected to shift from a
11slow decline to a free fall in California.

end delete
begin delete

12(p)

end delete

13begin insert(l)end insert To avoid bankrupting our health and social service systems
14serving the elderly and persons with disabilities, it is imperative
15that California prepare by identifying strategies that will promote
16appropriate, person-centered services for families struggling with
17providing care to a family member.

begin delete

18(q)

end delete

19begin insert(m)end insert It is in the interest of the state to better serve the
20approximately 4,000,000 families statewide who are currently
21struggling to care for an aging or disabled family member, many
22of whom are also in the workforce.

begin delete

23(r)

end delete

24begin insert(n)end insert There is an immense need for caregiving resources and
25services. As California’s populationbegin delete agesend deletebegin insert ages,end insert and as California
26becomes increasingly diverse, it isbegin delete alsoend delete in the interest of the state
27to adequately serve the following emerging caregiver populations:

28(1) Caregivers from the Black, Latino, Asian American, and
29Pacific Islander communities.

30(2) Families of individuals with developmental disabilities.

31(3) Persons who cannot access or are not eligible for existing
32caregiver support programs.

33(4) Non-English speakers, and ethnically and racially diverse
34populations that need caregiving programs to be provided in a
35culturally and linguistically appropriate manner.

36(5) Those in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
37community.

38(6) Rural residents.

39

SEC. 3.  

Section 9104 is added to the Welfare and Institutions
40Code
, to read:

P5    1

9104.  

(a) The department shallbegin delete, upon securing two hundred
2thousand dollars ($200,000) of nonstate funds from private sources
3for the purpose of implementing this section, convene a blue-ribbon
4panel on family caregiving and long-term services and supports.
5The panelend delete
begin insert convene a blue-ribbon task force on unpaid family
6caregiving upon receipt of two hundred thousand dollars
7($200,000) of nonstate funds from private sources for purposes of
8implementing this section. The department shall use the private
9funds solely for the planning, operation, assessment, and final
10recommendations of the task force.end insert

11begin insert(b)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertThe task forceend insert shall bebegin delete jointlyend delete chaired by the director of the
12department or his or her designee andbegin insert shall be vice-chaend insertbegin insertired byend insert a
13representative elected by the members of thebegin delete panelend deletebegin insert task forceend insert.

begin delete

14(b)

end delete

15begin insert(end insertbegin insertc)end insert Thebegin delete panelend deletebegin insert task forceend insert shall be comprised of at least 13
16members, each of whom shallbegin delete be representative ofend deletebegin insert have experience
17inend insert
one or more of the following categories:

18(1) A person with experience in the field of academic research
19on caregiving.

20(2) A family caregiver for an adult with a chronic or disabling
21condition.

22(3) A representative of the mental health community.

23(4) A representative of the California caregiver resource centers.

24(5) A representative of thebegin delete nationalend deletebegin insert Californiaend insert Alzheimer’s
25Association.

26(6) A representative of an organization that provides
27community-based adult services.

28(7) A representative of an organization that provides an adult
29day program.

30(8) A representative of an organization that provides services
31to caregivers.

32(9) A representative ofbegin delete an unpaid or family caregiver consumer
33organizationend delete
begin insert AARP Californiaend insert.

34(10) A representative with expertise in and knowledge of the
35specific needs of culturally and linguistically diverse caregivers
36and the unique challenges of delivering services to family
37caregivers who face cultural or linguistic barriers.

38(11) An adult with a chronic or disabling condition who receives
39care from an unpaid caregiver or family member.

P6    1(12) A director or designated representative of an area agency
2on aging.

begin delete

3(c)

end delete

4begin insert(d)end insert The blue-ribbonbegin delete panelend deletebegin insert task forceend insert shall do all of the following:

5(1) Review the current policies and practices of state, local, and
6community programs available to caregivers of adults with chronic
7or disabling conditions, and consider how the needs of family
8caregivers should be assessed and addressed so that they can
9continue in their caregiving role without being overburdened.

10(2) Consider the recommendations of other state plans,
11including, but not limited to, the Olmstead Plan, the Long-Range
12Strategic Plan on Aging, the State Plan for Alzheimer’s Disease,
13and the State Plan on Aging.

14(3) Compile an inventory of the resources available to family
15caregivers.

16(4) Determine gaps in services to family caregivers and identify
17barriers to participation in current programs.

18(5) Consider cultural and linguistic factors that impact caregivers
19and care recipients who are from diverse populations.

20(6) Consult with a broad range of stakeholders, including, but
21not limited to, people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, adults
22with disabling or chronic conditions, family caregivers,
23community-based and institutional providers, caregiving
24researchers and academicians, formal caregivers, the Caregiver
25Resource Centers, the California Commission on Aging, and other
26state entities.

27(7) Solicit testimony on the needs of family caregivers, including
28the designation of caregivers, training, respite services, medical
29leave policies, delegation of tasks to nonmedical aides, and other
30policies.

31(8) Identify best practices both in California and in other states.

32(9) Explore expanding those best practices in caregiving
33programs to populations that are not currently targeted.

begin delete

34(10) Develop at least three legislative recommendations to
35improve the provision of services for unpaid and family caregivers
36in California. These recommendations shall address all of the
37following:

38(A) Community-based support for California’s diverse
39population of caregivers for adults with chronic or disabling
40conditions.

P7    1(B) Choices for care and residence for persons with Alzheimer’s
2disease and their families.

3(C) The family caregiving competence of health care
4professionals.

end delete
begin insert

5(10) Make specific recommendations that address, at a
6minimum, each of the following:

end insert
begin insert

7(A) The development of a one-stop information hub Web site or
8portal that contains a list of current resources and supports
9available in a family caregiver’s community, or the contact
10information of a person or organization who can help a family
11caregiver navigate these support services.

end insert
begin insert

12(B) The enhancement of outreach and education efforts by area
13agencies on aging and family resource centers to ensure that
14information is provided to family caregivers at the time they need
15it most.

end insert
begin insert

16(C) The development of a caregiver screening and assessment
17tool that will help identify which services and supports a family
18caregiver needs.

end insert

19(11) Prepare and provide to the Legislature a report of its
20findings and recommendations on or before July 1, 2016.

begin delete

21(d)

end delete

22begin insert(e)end insert (1) Members shall serve without compensation, but shall
23receive reimbursement for travel and other necessary expenses
24actually incurred in the performance of their official duties.

25(2) Thebegin delete panelend deletebegin insert task forceend insert shall meet on a bimonthly basis.

begin insert

26(3) Members of the task force shall be appointed to serve for
27the duration of the task force.

end insert
begin delete

28(3)

end delete

29begin insert(4)end insert All meetings of thebegin delete panelend deletebegin insert task forceend insert shall be open to the
30public and adequate notice shall be provided in accordance with
31the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with
32Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
33the Government Code).

begin delete

34(e) (1) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
35paragraph (11) of subdivision (c) is inoperative on July 1, 2020,
36pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.

end delete
begin delete

37(2)

end delete

38begin insert(f)end insert A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (11) of
39subdivisionbegin delete (c)end deletebegin insert (d)end insert shall be submitted in compliance with Section
409795 of the Government Code.

begin insert

P8    1(g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2018,
2and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
3is enacted before January 1, 2018, deletes or extends that date.

end insert


O

    95