Amended in Senate August 19, 2014

Amended in Senate August 4, 2014

Amended in Assembly May 23, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 8, 2014

Amended in Assembly March 20, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1744


Introduced by Assembly Member Brown

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Atkins)

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Cooley, Levine, Waldron, and Yamada)

February 14, 2014


An act to add and repeal Section 9104 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to aging.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1744, as amended, Brown. California Department of Aging.

The Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act creates the California Department of Aging to provide leadership to the area agencies on aging in developing systems of home- and community-based services that maintain individuals in their own homes or least restrictive homelike environments. Existing law requires the department, in accomplishing its mission, to consider available data and population trends in developing programs and policies, collaborate with area agencies on aging, the California Commission on Aging, and other state and local agencies.

This bill, until January 1, 2018, would require the department to convene a blue-ribbon task force comprised of at least 13 members, as specified, to make legislative recommendations to improve services for unpaid and family caregivers in California,begin delete as provided. The bill would condition this requirement upon the receipt of $200,000 inend deletebegin insert if the department receives sufficientend insert nonstate funds from private sourcesbegin delete for purposes of implementingend deletebegin insert to implementend insert the bill. The bill would require the task force to prepare a report of its findings and recommendations and provide it to the Legislature on or before July 1,begin delete 2016end deletebegin insert 2017end insert. The bill would make related findings and declarations.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

begin delete
P2    1

SECTION 1.  

This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
2California Caregiver Act of 2014.

3

SEC. 2.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

4(a) A caregiver can be any relative, partner, friend, or neighbor
5who has a significant relationship with, and who provides a broad
6range of assistance to, an older person or an adult with a chronic
7or disabling condition.

8(b) At present, there is no complete inventory of caregiving
9programs available to Californians performing unpaid caregiving
10services for an aging or disabled family member, friend, or
11neighbor.

12(c) Rising demand and shrinking families to provide caregiving
13support suggest that California needs a comprehensive person-
14and family-centered policy for long-term services and supports
15systems that would better serve the needs of older persons with
16disabilities, support family and friends in their caregiving roles,
17and promote greater efficiencies in public spending.

18(d) California ranked 24th out of 50 states and the District of
19Columbia on the State Long-Term Services and Supports Scorecard
20sponsored by the SCAN Foundation, American Association of
21Retired Persons (AARP), and the Commonwealth Fund.

22(e) Family support is a key driver in remaining in one’s home
23and community, but it comes at substantial costs to the caregivers,
24their families, and to society. If family caregivers were no longer
25available, the economic cost to California’s health care and
P3    1long-term services and supports systems would increase
2astronomically.

3(f) Approximately 4 million family caregivers in California
4provide care to an adult with limitations in daily activities at any
5given point in time, and over 5.8 million provide care at some time
6during the year. In addition, California’s family caregivers provide
7an estimated 3,850,000,000 hours of unpaid labor caring for their
8loved ones. The estimated economic value of their unpaid
9contributions is approximately $47 billion.

10(g) Fifty-nine percent of all family caregivers are employed full
11or part time. Family caregivers typically spend 20 hours a week
12caring for a family member who needs help with bathing, dressing,
13and other kinds of personal care, as well as household tasks such
14as shopping and managing finances.

15(h) Nationally, 46 percent of family caregivers perform medical
16or nursing tasks for care recipients with multiple chronic physical
17and cognitive conditions. More than three-quarters of family
18caregivers who provide medical or nursing tasks are managing
19medications, including administering intravenous fluids and
20 injections. Nearly half of family caregivers are administering five
21to nine prescription medications a day, and one in five is helping
22with 10 or more prescription medications a day. Yet most
23caregivers report that they trained themselves to perform
24medication management.

25(i) Only 31 percent of caregivers report being visited at home
26by a health care professional. Twenty-seven percent of caregivers
27report that they have no additional assistance from a family
28member, health care professional, or home health aide.

29(j) Nationally, more than 8 in 10 caregivers are over 50 years
30of age. Family caregivers are aging and are increasingly from
31diverse social, racial, ethnic, and political backgrounds. As the
32baby boomers age into their 80s, the decline in the caregiver
33support ratio is projected to shift from a slow decline to a free fall
34in California.

35(k) For many families in the midst of caregiving, there is deep
36worry and concern about the quality of care and quality of life.
37They do not know who to call or where to go to get the right kind
38of affordable help when they need it.

39(l) To avoid bankrupting our health and social service systems
40serving the elderly and persons with disabilities, it is imperative
P4    1that California prepare by identifying strategies that will promote
2appropriate, person-centered services for families struggling with
3providing care to a family member.

4(m) It is in the interest of the state to better serve the
5approximately 4,000,000 families statewide who are currently
6struggling to care for an aging or disabled family member, many
7of whom are also in the workforce.

8(n) There is an immense need for caregiving resources and
9services. As California’s population ages, and as California
10becomes increasingly diverse, it is in the interest of the state to
11adequately serve the following emerging caregiver populations:

12(1) Caregivers from the Black, Latino, Asian American, and
13Pacific Islander communities.

14(2) Families of individuals with developmental disabilities.

15(3) Persons who cannot access or are not eligible for existing
16caregiver support programs.

17(4) Non-English speakers, and ethnically and racially diverse
18populations that need caregiving programs to be provided in a
19culturally and linguistically appropriate manner.

20(5) Those in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
21community.

22(6) Rural residents.

end delete
23

begin deleteSEC. 3.end delete
24begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

Section 9104 is added to the Welfare and
25Institutions Code
, to read:

26

9104.  

(a) The department shall convene a blue-ribbon task
27force on unpaid family caregiving upon receipt ofbegin delete two hundred
28thousand dollars ($200,000) ofend delete
begin insert sufficientend insert nonstate fundsbegin insert, as
29determined by the department,end insert
from private sourcesbegin delete for purposes
30of implementingend delete
begin insert to implementend insert this section. The department shall
31use the private funds solely for the planning, operation, assessment,
32and final recommendations of the task force.

33(b) The task force shall be chaired bybegin delete the director of the
34department or his or her designee and shall be vice-chaired byend delete
a
35representative elected by the members of the task force.

36(c) The task force shall be comprised of at least 13 members,
37each of whom shall have experience in one or more of the
38following categories:

39(1) A person with experience in the field of academic research
40on caregiving.

P5    1(2) A family caregiver for an adult with a chronic or disabling
2condition.

3(3) A representative of the mental health community.

4(4) A representative of the California caregiver resource centers.

5(5) A representative of thebegin delete Californiaend delete Alzheimer’sbegin delete Associationend delete
6begin insert Disease communityend insert.

7(6) A representative of an organization that provides
8community-based adult services.

begin delete

9(7) A representative of an organization that provides an adult
10day program.

end delete
begin delete

11(8)

end delete

12begin insert(7)end insert A representative of an organization that provides services
13to caregivers.

begin delete

14(9)

end delete

15begin insert(end insertbegin insert8)end insert A representative ofbegin delete AARP Californiaend deletebegin insert a nonprofit
16organization representing senior citizensend insert
.

begin delete

17(10)

end delete

18begin insert(9)end insert A representative with expertise in and knowledge of the
19specific needs of culturally and linguistically diverse caregivers
20and the unique challenges of delivering services to family
21caregivers who face cultural or linguistic barriers.

begin delete

22(11)

end delete

23begin insert(1end insertbegin insert0)end insert An adult with a chronic or disabling condition who receives
24care from an unpaid caregiver or family member.

begin delete

25(12)

end delete

26begin insert(11)end insert A director or designated representative of an area agency
27on aging.

28(d) The blue-ribbon task force shall do all of the following:

29(1) Review the current policies and practices of state, local, and
30community programs available to caregivers of adults with chronic
31or disabling conditions, and consider how the needs of family
32caregivers should be assessed and addressed so that they can
33continue in their caregiving role without being overburdened.

34(2) Consider the recommendations of other state plans,
35including, but not limited to, the Olmstead Plan, the Long-Range
36Strategic Plan on Aging, the State Plan for Alzheimer’s Disease,
37and the State Plan on Aging.

38(3) Compile an inventory of the resources available to family
39caregivers.

P6    1(4) Determine gaps in services to family caregivers and identify
2barriers to participation in current programs.

3(5) Consider cultural and linguistic factors that impact caregivers
4and care recipients who are from diverse populations.

5(6) Consult with a broad range of stakeholders, including, but
6not limited to, people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, adults
7with disabling or chronic conditions, family caregivers,
8community-based and institutional providers, caregiving
9researchers and academicians, formal caregivers, the Caregiver
10Resource Centers, the California Commission on Aging, and other
11state entities.

12(7) Solicit testimony on the needs of family caregivers, including
13the designation of caregivers, training, respite services, medical
14leave policies, delegation of tasks to nonmedical aides, and other
15policies.

begin insert

16(8) Assess information referral and resource sharing systems
17used by family caregivers by doing all of the following:

end insert
begin insert

18(A) Compiling an inventory of the resources available to family
19caregivers.

end insert
begin insert

20(B) Determining access barriers in the current system.

end insert
begin insert

21(C) Considering the cultural and linguistic factors that impact
22caregivers and care recipients who are from diverse populations.

end insert
begin insert

23(D) Comparing consistency of access across the counties.

end insert
begin delete

24(8)

end delete

25begin insert(9)end insert Identify best practices both in California and in other states.

begin delete

26(9)

end delete

27begin insert(10)end insert Explore expanding those best practices in caregiving
28programs to populations that are not currently targeted.

begin delete

29(10)

end delete

30begin insert(11)end insert Make specific recommendations that address, at a
31minimum, each of the following:

32(A) The development ofbegin delete a one-stop information hubend deletebegin insert an Internetend insert
33 Web site or portal that contains a list of current resources and
34supports available in a family caregiver’s community,begin delete orend deletebegin insert andend insert the
35contact information of a person or organization who can help a
36family caregiver navigate these support services.

37(B) The enhancement of outreach and education efforts by area
38agencies on aging and family resourcebegin delete centers to ensure that
39information is provided to family caregivers at the time they need
40it most.end delete
begin insert centers.end insert

P7    1(C) The development of a caregiver screening and assessment
2tool that will help identify which services and supports a family
3caregiver needs.

begin delete

4(11)

end delete

5begin insert(12)end insert Prepare and provide to the Legislature a report of its
6findings and recommendations on or before July 1,begin delete 2016end deletebegin insert 2017end insert.

7(e) (1) Members shall serve without compensation, but shall
8receive reimbursement for travel and other necessary expenses
9actually incurred in the performance of their official duties.

10(2) The task force shall meet on a bimonthly basis.

11(3) Members of the task force shall be appointed to serve for
12the duration of the task force.

13(4) All meetings of the task force shall be open to the public
14and adequate notice shall be provided in accordance with the
15Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with
16Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
17the Government Code).

18(f) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (11) of
19subdivision (d) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795
20of the Government Code.

21(g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2018,
22and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
23is enacted before January 1, 2018, deletes or extends that date.



O

    94