AB 1744, as amended, Brown. California Department of Aging.
The Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act creates the California Department of Aging to provide leadership to the area agencies on aging in developing systems of home- and community-based services that maintain individuals in their own homes or least restrictive homelike environments. Existing law requires the department, in accomplishing its mission, to consider available data and population trends in developing programs and policies, collaborate with area agencies on aging, the California Commission on Aging, and other state and local agencies.
This bill, until January 1, 2018, would require the department tobegin delete conveneend deletebegin insert establishend insert a blue-ribbon task force
comprised of at least 13 members, as specified, to make legislative recommendations to improve services for unpaid and family caregivers in California, if the department receives sufficient nonstate funds from private sources to implement the bill. The bill would require the task force to prepare a report of its findings and recommendations and provide it to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2017. The bill would make related findings and declarations.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the
2California Caregiver Act of 2014.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
end insertbegin insert
4(a) A caregiver can be any relative, partner, friend, or neighbor
5who has a significant relationship with, and who provides a broad
6range of assistance to, an older person or an adult with a chronic
7or disabling condition.
8(b) At present, there is no complete inventory of caregiving
9programs available to Californians performing unpaid caregiving
10services for an aging or disabled family member, friend, or
11neighbor.
12(c) Family support is a key driver in remaining in one’s home
13and community, but it comes at substantial costs to the caregivers,
14their families, and to society. If family caregivers were no longer
15available, the economic cost to California’s health care and
16long-term services and supports systems would increase
17astronomically.
18(d) Fifty-nine percent of all family caregivers are employed full
19or part time. Family caregivers typically spend 20 hours a week
20caring for a family member who needs help with bathing, dressing,
21and other kinds of personal care, as well as household tasks such
22as shopping and managing finances.
Section 9104 is added to the Welfare and Institutions
3Code, to read:
(a) The department shallbegin delete conveneend deletebegin insert establishend insert a blue-ribbon
5task force on unpaid family caregiving upon receipt of sufficient
6nonstate funds, as determined by the department, from private
7sources to implement this section. The department shall use the
8private funds solely for the planning, operation, assessment, and
9final recommendations of the task force.
10(b) The task force shall be chaired by
a representative elected
11by the members of the task force.
12(c) The task force shall be comprised of at least 13 members,
13each of whom shall have experience in one or more of the
14following categories:
15(1) A person with experience in the field of academic research
16on caregiving.
17(2) A family caregiver for an adult with a chronic or disabling
18condition.
19(3) A representative of the mental health community.
20(4) A representative of the California caregiver resource centers.
21(5) A representative of the Alzheimer’s Disease community.
22(6) A representative of an organization that provides
23community-based adult services.
24(7) A representative of an organization that provides services
25to caregivers.
26(8) A representative of a nonprofit organization representing
27senior citizens.
28(9) A representative with expertise in and knowledge of the
29specific needs of culturally and linguistically diverse caregivers
30and the unique challenges of delivering services to family
31caregivers who face cultural or linguistic barriers.
32(10) An adult with a chronic or disabling condition who receives
33care from an unpaid
caregiver or family member.
34(11) A director or designated representative of an area agency
35on aging.
36(d) The blue-ribbon task force shall do all of the following:
37(1) Review the current policies and practices of state, local, and
38community programs available to caregivers of adults with chronic
39or disabling conditions, and consider how the needs of family
P4 1caregivers should be assessed and addressed so that they can
2continue in their caregiving role without being overburdened.
3(2) Consider the recommendations of other state plans,
4including, but not limited to, the Olmstead Plan, the Long-Range
5Strategic Plan on Aging, the State Plan for Alzheimer’s Disease,
6and
the State Plan on Aging.
7(3) Compile an inventory of the resources available to family
8caregivers.
9(4) Determine gaps in services to family caregivers and identify
10barriers to participation in current programs.
11(5) Consider cultural and linguistic factors that impact caregivers
12and care recipients who are from diverse populations.
13(6) Consult with a broad range of stakeholders, including, but
14not limited to, people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, adults
15with disabling or chronic conditions, family caregivers,
16community-based and institutional providers, caregiving
17researchers and academicians, formal caregivers, the Caregiver
18Resource Centers, the
California Commission on Aging, and other
19state entities.
20(7) Solicit testimony on the needs of family caregivers, including
21the designation of caregivers, training, respite services, medical
22leave policies, delegation of tasks to nonmedical aides, and other
23policies.
24(8) Assess information referral and resource sharing systems
25used by family caregivers by doing all of the following:
26(A) Compiling an inventory of the resources available to family
27caregivers.
28(B) Determining access barriers in the current system.
29(C) Considering the
cultural and linguistic factors that impact
30caregivers and care recipients who are from diverse populations.
31(D) Comparing consistency of access across the counties.
32(9) Identify best practices both in California and in other states.
33(10) Explore expanding those best practices in caregiving
34programs to populations that are not currently targeted.
35(11) Make specific recommendations that address, at a
36minimum, each of the following:
37(A) The development of an Internet Web site or portal that
38contains a list of current resources and supports available in a
39family
caregiver’s community, and the contact information of a
P5 1person or organization who can help a family caregiver navigate
2these support services.
3(B) The enhancement of outreach and education efforts by area
4agencies on aging and family resource
centers.
5(C) The development of a caregiver screening and assessment
6tool that will help identify which services and supports a family
7caregiver needs.
8(12) Prepare and provide to the Legislature a report of its
9findings and recommendations on or before July 1, 2017.
10(e) (1) Members shall serve without compensation, but shall
11receive reimbursement for travel and other necessary expenses
12actually incurred in the performance of their official duties.
13(2) The task force shall meet on a bimonthly basis.
14(3) Members of the task force shall be appointed to serve for
15the
duration of the task force.
16(4) All meetings of the task force shall be open to the public
17and adequate notice shall be provided in accordance with the
18Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with
19Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
20the Government Code).
21(f) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (11) of
22subdivision (d) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795
23of the Government Code.
24(g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2018,
25and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
26is enacted before January 1, 2018, deletes or extends that date.
O
93