BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1804
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1804 (Perea)
          As Amended  August 7, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |76-2 |(May 29, 2014)  |SENATE: |36-0 |(August 13,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    INS.  

           SUMMARY  :  Provides that policyholders of most individual  
          insurance policies are entitled to designate a third-party who  
          will be sent a notice if the policy is about to lapse for  
          nonpayment of premium.  

           The Senate amendments  :

          1)Provide that automobile insurance policies with a policy  
            period of less than six months are not subject to this bill's  
            requirements.

          2)Expand the scope of homeowners' policies that are subject to  
            this bill by referencing the existing definition of  
            homeowners' insurance in the mandatory offer of earthquake  
            insurance law.

          3)Require that the process established by the insurer to provide  
            policyholders notice of the right to designate a third party  
            to receive cancellation notices be verifiable.

          4)Provide that if, after compliance with this bill's  
            requirements, a policyholder initiates contact with the  
            insurer seeking to designate a third party, and the insurer  
            complies with the request, no further verification is  
            required.

          5)Clarify the procedures that are to be used to comply with this  
            bill, including the right to use electronic communication for  
            this bill's initial notice requirements (but not for an actual  
            cancellation notice that must be sent to the third party in  
            the event of nonpayment of premium).

          6)Delete the requirement that the insurer obtain the telephone  








                                                                  AB 1804
                                                                  Page  2

            number of the third party who is designated by the  
            policyholder.

          7)Make minor technical and clarifying changes.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes, with various time frames depending on the type of  
            insurance policy, that a policy cannot be cancelled for  
            nonpayment of premium unless the named insured is provided a  
            notice that the policy will be cancelled on a date certain.

          2)Provides that an individual life insurance policy shall not be  
            issued or delivered in California unless the policyholder has  
            been afforded the right to designate at least one person in  
            addition to the policyholder to receive a notice that the  
            policy is going to lapse for nonpayment of premium.

          3)Provides that an individual policy or certificate under a  
            group policy of Long-Term Care (LTC) insurance shall not be  
            issued in California unless the policyholder has been afforded  
            the right to designate at least one person in addition to the  
            policyholder to receive a notice that the policy is going to  
            lapse for nonpayment of premium.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the  
          Legislative Counsel.

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)Purpose.  According to the sponsor, the California Department  
            of Insurance (DOI), this bill is an important consumer benefit  
            for people who have difficulty managing their insurance  
            responsibilities either due to heath or residency issues.  DOI  
            notes that policyholders of all ages can find themselves in  
            situations that might cause important insurance protections to  
            lapse due to a failure to pay the premium.  In addition to  
            older policyholders who might want a relative or close family  
            friend to keep an eye on their insurance protections, others  
            who might have prolonged separations from their primary  
            residence, such as college students, members of the military,  
            or people who work for extended periods away from home will  
            find the bill's proposal a great benefit.

          2)Opt-in.  This bill is a consumer opt-in proposal.  Insurers  








                                                                  AB 1804
                                                                  Page  3

            would be required to make the policyholders aware of the right  
            to designate third parties, and the policyholders would have  
            the right to accept or waive the right.  In this regard,  
            insurers that oppose this bill point out that existing law  
            relating to life and LTC insurance provides more flexibility  
            to the insurer in implementing what is, essentially, the same  
            right that this bill would create for other types of  
            insurance.

          3)Military personnel.  United Services Automobile Association,  
            an insurer that covers active and retired military and their  
            families, believes that this bill has possible benefits for  
            the military personnel who are forced to leave their homes  
            with very short notice in order to be deployed for long  
            periods of time.  The opportunity to plan ahead with an opt-in  
            provision provides the clarity needed when putting personal  
            business in order, and allows our military to have faith that  
            a policy that is critical to their family well-being is  
            responsibly handled.  


           Analysis Prepared by :    Mark Rakich / INS. / (916) 319-2086  


          FN: 0004584