BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 1816 (Yamada) - Long-term health care facilities.
          
          Amended: June 17, 2014          Policy Vote: Health 8-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 4, 2014                            
          Consultant: Brendan McCarthy    
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 1816 would require the Department of Public  
          Health to set a 60-day performance benchmark for the completion  
          of investigations into complaints against long-term health care  
          facilities.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Increased costs up to $15.3 million per year for additional  
              staff to complete investigations within the benchmark  
              (Licensing and Certification Fund). According to the  
              Department of Public Health, currently about 40% of  
              complaint investigations are completed within 60 days. In  
              order to complete all investigations within 60 days, the  
              Department projects that it will need 73 additional staff  
              positions to conduct the investigations as well as  
              associated administrative positions. 

              The Department has indicated that it would also need the  
              equivalent of 9 additional positions to prepare summaries  
              for all investigations in which the complaint was  
              unsubstantiated, in case the complainant requested that  
              information. Because the bill would only require that  
              information to be provided to a complainant upon request,  
              staff does not believe it would be necessary to prepare such  
              reports for each unsubstantiated complaint. Therefore, this  
              analysis does not include those staff costs.

              Increased costs of $1.1 million per year to state-owned  
              facilities licensed by the Department due to fee increases  
              on all facility operators to pay for the increased costs of  
              the bill (General Fund).

              Unknown potential impact to the Medi-Cal program and the  








          AB 1816 (Yamada)
          Page 1


              General Fund due to potential impacts on the "quality  
              assurance fee" assessed on long-term care facilities. Under  
              current law, long-term health care facility operators are  
              assessed a quality assurance fee, which is used by the state  
              to draw down additional funding for the long-term care  
              services provided by the Medi-Cal program and to provide  
              General Fund savings related to Medi-Cal. Federal law limits  
              the amount of any quality assurance fee (including other  
              fees assessed by the states). The Department of Public  
              Health indicates that the fee increases necessary to pay for  
              the increased costs of this bill may limit the state's  
              ability to collect quality assurance fees (or limit the  
              Department's ability to raise fee revenue sufficient to pay  
              for the costs of this bill).

          Background: The Department of Public Health licenses and  
          regulates long-term health care facilities - which include  
          skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities,  
          congregate living health facilities, nursing facilities, and  
          pediatric day health and respite facilities. When the Department  
          receives a complaint against a long-term health care facility,  
          the Department is require to make an onsite inspection of the  
          complaint within ten working days or within 24 hours if the  
          complaint involves a threat of imminent danger. The Department  
          is required to notify the complainant and the facility of its  
          determinations within ten days of the completion of an  
          investigation. There is no deadline in statute under which the  
          Department is required to complete an investigation.

          Proposed Law: AB 1816 would require the Department of Public  
          Health to set a 60-day performance benchmark for the completion  
          of investigations of complaints against long-term care  
          facilities.

          Specific provisions of the bill would:
              Require the Department of Public Health, by July 1, 2015,  
              to set a performance benchmark, not to exceed 60 days, for  
              the completion of investigations;
              Allow the Department to extend an investigation beyond 60  
              days, but require the Department to notify the complainant;
              Upon request of the complainant, require the Department to  
              provide written information to a complainant on the  
              investigation;
              State legislative intent that the Department complete its  








          AB 1816 (Yamada)
          Page 2


              investigations within the benchmark;
              Require the Department to analyze its compliance with the  
              benchmark in its annual staffing analysis of the Licensing  
              and Certification Program.

          Related Legislation: AB 1996 (Brown) would have increased the  
          frequency of inspections of long-term health care facilities to  
          every year and would have authorized an inspector to refer a  
          facility for the appointment of a temporary manager. That bill  
          was never heard in the Assembly Health Committee.

          Staff Comments: As noted above, there is uncertainty about  
          whether the fee increases on long-term care providers that would  
          be necessary to pay for the costs of this bill can be assessed  
          on long-term care facilities without impacting the quality  
          assurance fee assessed on long-term care facilities.