BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1850
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 9, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 1850 (Waldron) - As Amended: March 17, 2014
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill specifies that a minor who was not a victim, but was
present or "located near," an act of domestic violence, is a
witness and is deemed to have suffered harm for the purposes of
issuing a protective order in a pending criminal case.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable trial court costs to the extent this bill
results in an increase in protective orders.
It appears that in most cases the court could currently issue a
protective order in these cases, based upon a good cause belief
that a victim or witness may suffer harm. While this bill deems
the harm to exist, the court retains the prerogative to issue a
protective order.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . According to the author, AB 1850 states a child's
presence during an act of domestic violence makes the child a
witness and deems that the child has suffered harm, thereby
clarifying that courts may issue protective orders for such
children. The author's intent is to protect infants and young
children who cannot vocalize or otherwise testify about the
harm they suffered.
2)Current law authorizes the court in a criminal case to issue
protective orders when there is good cause to believe that
harm to, or intimidation or dissuasion of a victim or witness
has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur, and requires a
AB 1850
Page 2
court, in all cases where the defendant is charged with a
crime of domestic violence, to consider issuing a protective
order on its own motion.
3)Concerns . California Attorneys for Criminal Justice contend
courts may already issue protective orders for children who
have been, or may be, harmed, and that the "located near"
language is vague, leading to "standard-less results."
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081