BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1857|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1857
          Author:   Frazier (D)
          Amended:  3/28/14 in Assembly
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  10-1, 6/24/14
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Gaines, Beall, Cannella, Galgiani, Hueso,  
            Lara, Liu, Pavley, Roth
          NOES:  Wyland

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  60-14, 5/27/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Caltrans equipment procurement

           SOURCE  :     Transportation California


           DIGEST  :    This bill permits the California Department of  
          Transportation (Caltrans) to conduct a pilot program to purchase  
          and equip heavy mobile fleet vehicles and special equipment by  
          means of best value procurement.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires the Department of General  
          Services (DGS) to investigate and establish the need for  
          acquiring new state-owned motor vehicles and for all state  
          agencies to acquire motor vehicles through, or under the  
          supervision of, DGS.  Existing law further requires state  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1857
                                                                     Page  
          2

          agencies to award contracts for goods and services to the lowest  
          responsible bidder, with a few limited exceptions.

          This bill:

          1.Permits Caltrans to conduct a pilot program to purchase and  
            equip heavy mobile fleet vehicles and special equipment by  
            means of best value procurement.

          2.Defines best value procurement as a method of selecting a  
            proposal based on an evaluation of the following factors in  
            addition to price:

                 Total cost of ownership, including repair and  
               maintenance costs
                 Product performance, productivity, and safety standards
                 The supplier's ability to perform to the contract  
               requirements
                 Environmental benefits, including reduction of  
               greenhouse gas emissions, reduction of air pollutant  
               emissions, or reduction of toxic or hazardous materials

          1.Requires Caltrans to develop and utilize a scoring method  
            based on these factors, with predetermined weighted values, as  
            well as price in determining the winning bid.
          2.Limits Caltrans' best value procurements to $20 million  
            annually.

          3.Requires DGS, by June 1, 2018, to evaluate Caltrans'  
            experience with best value procurement and for Caltrans to  
            post the evaluation on its website.  

           4. Repeals this pilot program on January 1, 2019.

           Comments

           According to the National Association of State Procurement  
          Officials' 2011-2012 Survey of State Procurement Practices, 34  
          states use full life-cycle costs to determine contract awards to  
          vendors.  Studies suggest that results have generally been good  
          when public agencies utilize best value procurement, despite the  
          long-standing precedence for the low-bid procurement system.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1857
                                                                     Page  
          3

          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           Unknown annual increases in vehicle and equipment purchase  
            costs, if best value procurement results in higher initial  
            costs, likely offset by life-cycle cost savings over time.  
            (State Highway Account)

           One-time costs to DGS, likely in the range of $150,000 in  
            2017-18, to prepare an evaluation of Caltrans' best value  
            procurement pilot program. (General Fund)

           There could be a shift in administrative workload from DGS to  
            Caltrans to the extent that Caltrans would have purchased  
            these vehicles through DGS procurement absent the bill.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/15/14)

          Transportation California (source) 
          California Manufacturers & Technology Association
          California Taxpayers Association
          Caterpillar, Inc.
          John Deere
          AFSCME
          South Coast Air Quality Management District

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, this bill is  
          intended to provide Caltrans with an optional procurement method  
          to determine whether overall savings may be achieved by  
          evaluating factors other than price when purchasing heavy-duty  
          vehicles and equipment.  While the standard lowest responsible  
          bid procurement process provides a clear and objective measure  
          to ensure the lowest initial procurement cost, it prevents  
          Caltrans from considering other value-related factors when  
          purchasing heavy vehicles.  The author suggests that, while  
          initial procurement costs may be higher with best value  
          procurement, through this alternative procurement method  
          Caltrans will realize overall life-cycle cost savings.

          Writing in support of this bill, Caterpillar Inc. and its  
          California dealers claim that the state would benefit from  
          moving to a life-cycle cost model for procuring heavy vehicles  
          and equipment.  They note that allowing Caltrans to make a  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 1857
                                                                     Page  
          4

          broader based evaluation of equipment purchase options will  
          attract qualified bidders and hold them accountable for  
          delivering the highest quality product.  They also note that the  
          result of including "downstream" operating costs associated with  
          equipment purchase decisions into solicitations and bids will  
          likely result in lower overall costs.  Caltrans subjects much of  
          its heavy equipment to strenuous, taxing work, and therefore  
          factoring the cost of the equipment over its entire lifespan  
          appears reasonable and responsible.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  60-14, 5/27/14
          AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonilla,  
            Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau,  
            Chesbro, Cooley, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman,  
            Fong, Fox, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gray, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez, Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Levine,  
            Linder, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi,  
            Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Perea, John A. P�rez, V.  
            Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas,  
            Skinner, Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada,  
            Atkins
          NOES: Allen, Conway, Donnelly, Beth Gaines, Gorell, Grove,  
            Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Mansoor, Melendez, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Bigelow, Ch�vez, Logue, Patterson,  
            Quirk-Silva, Vacancy


          JA:nl  8/16/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****











                                                                CONTINUED