AB 1872, as introduced, Stone. Transportation planning.
Under existing law, the Legislature has made findings regarding the need for continuing and improving transportation planning at the state, regional, and local level.
This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to those provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 14000 of the Government Code is
2amended to read:
The Legislature hereby finds and declares as follows:
4(a) Continued growth in transport demand resulting from
5population growth, concentration of population in urban areas, and
6increasing mobility requirements indicate a need for innovative,
7as well as improved, systems to accommodate increased demand.
8(b) The diversity of conditions in Californiabegin delete is such as to requireend delete
9begin insert requiresend insert a variety of solutions to transportation problems within
10various areas of the state. Differences in population levels
and
11densities, living patterns, social conditions, topography, climate,
P2 1environmental circumstances, and other factors should be
2recognized in determining appropriate solutions to transportation
3problems in the various areas. Particular attention must be given
4to differences among the metropolitan, the less urbanized, and the
5more rural areas of the state. In some cases, future demands,
6particularly in urban corridors, may prove to be beyond the
7practical capabilities of a highway solution; while in other cases,
8environmental conditions may rule out a highway solution. In still
9other cases, heavy reliance upon highway transportation may prove
10to be satisfactory for the foreseeable future. Clearly, the appropriate
11mix of transportation modes throughout California to provide
12economical and efficient transportation service consistent with
13desires for mobilitybegin delete,end delete will vary markedly from time to time and
14from area to area within the
state.
15In all cases, regional and local expressions of transportation
16goals, objectives, and policiesbegin delete whichend deletebegin insert thatend insert reflect the unique
17characteristics and aspirations of various areas of the state shall
18be recognized in transportation planning tempered, however, by
19consideration of statewide interests.
20(c) A goal of the state is to provide adequate, safe, and efficient
21transportation facilities and services for the movement of people
22and goods at reasonable cost. The provision of adequate
23transportation services for persons not now adequately served by
24any transportation mode, particularly the disadvantaged, the elderly,
25the handicapped, and the young, should be an integral element of
26the planning process.
Stimulation of the provision of transportation
27not only for speed and efficiency of travel, but also for convenience
28and enjoyment in shopping, school, cultural, and business pursuits,
29leisure time travel, and pedestrian travel, is also a state aim. It is
30thebegin delete desireend deletebegin insert intentend insert of the state to provide a transportation system that
31significantly reduces hazards to human life, pollution of the
32atmosphere, generation of noise, disruption of community
33organization, and adverse impacts on the natural environment. The
34desirability of utilizing corridors for multimodal transportation,
35where possible to improve efficiency and economy in land use, is
36recognized. The coastal zone should be provided with optimal
37transportation services consistent with local and regional goals
38and plans, with the objective of conserving the coastal
resource.
39(d) The responsibilities for decisionmaking for California’s
40transportation systems are highly fragmented. This has hampered
P3 1effective integration of transportation planning and intermodal
2coordination. A comprehensive multimodal transportation planning
3process should be establishedbegin delete whichend deletebegin insert
thatend insert involves all levels of
4government and the private sector in a cooperative process to
5develop coordinated transportation plans.
6(e) Accelerating change and increasing transportation problems
7require that California take timely action to maintain viable
8transportation systems. As long lead times are necessary to develop
9transportation systems, the planning and development of
10transportation in California should be coordinated by a Department
11of Transportation. A multimodal transportation department in state
12government is in keeping with the necessities of contemporary
13problems and the thrust of federal involvement. However, there
14is no intent to diminish or preempt the existing authorities and
15responsibilities of regional, local, and district transportation
16agencies in their handling of transportation mattersbegin delete whichend deletebegin insert
thatend insert are
17local or regional in nature.
18(f) The stimulation, continuance, and improvement of statewide,
19regional, and local transportation planning and development are
20a matter of state concern, and the state should, for this reason,
21provide a portion of the financial resources and assistance necessary
22to aid in preparing transportation plans, developing effective
23transportation decisionmaking processes, and carrying out
24implementation programs.
O
99