BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 1882
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 7, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 1882 (Cooley) - As Amended: April 1, 2014
Policy Committee: Human
ServicesVote:7 - 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill requires county child welfare agencies (CWA) to
determine whether relative foster care givers are eligible for
assistance under the California Work Opportunity and
Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program or through the
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, and makes
correlating changes to permit eligible children in foster care
to receive additional supportive services funding. Specifically,
this bill:
1)Requires a CWA, immediately following the placement of a child
who has been removed from his or her home into the home of a
relative or nonrelative extended family member (NREFM) to
determine whether the relative or NREFM qualifies for CalWORKs
or SSI.
2)If a relative or NREFM does not qualify for AFDC-FC benefits,
requires the CWA to explain the ineligibility determination
and immediately screen the child for eligibility under SSI.
3)Requires the social worker to provide the relative or NREFM a
summary of the eligibility requirements to qualify for AFDC-FC
and specialized care increment assistance benefits and to
explain in person the steps the relative or NREFM would need
to take to qualify.
4)Provides that a child who is placed into foster care with a
relative who qualifies for AFDC-FC payments shall also be
eligible to receive the following supportive benefits,
including reimbursement for reasonable school travel expenses,
a specialized care increment for children with a developmental
AB 1882
Page 2
or physical disability. a clothing allowance, and an infant
supplement for infants of dependent children.
FISCAL EFFECT
One-time costs in 2014-15 of approximately $19 million (TANF/GF)
and on-going costs of up to $37 million for additional
screenings and supportive services. This assumes approximately
5,200 eligible cases receiving an additional $590 per month in
services.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . Over 38% of California's foster youth are placed with
relatives. The sponsor of the bill, the Children's Law Center
of California notes that relatives in our state who care for
children that are not eligible for federal foster care
assistance are eligible for CalWORKs benefits instead of
foster care payments. However these CalWORKs benefits can be
difficult to access for many relative caregivers. However,
even those caregivers that do successfully access CalWORKs
benefits are denied a range of additional supports provided to
children receiving foster care benefits, including
reimbursement for transportation expenses to ensure that the
youth can remain in their school of origin, clothing
allowances, the infant supplement provided to foster youth who
are parenting, and specialized care increments provided to
youth with special needs.
AB 1882 seeks to ensure that relatives caring for a foster
child are given information on the financial support and
services for which the child may qualify. The bill also makes
those children eligible for CalWORKs funding, and other
financial and educational support programs.
2)Disparities in support for foster child caregivers . Relative
caregivers are sought out by the state's Child Welfare
Services because they are considered the ideal placement for a
child who has been removed from the custody of his or her
parent(s). Yet there is an imbalance in child welfare policy
in which relative placement is prioritized, but those
placements do not receive the same level of financial support
as placements with licensed or certified caregivers. Further,
relative caregivers who care for a non-federally eligible
AB 1882
Page 3
child in foster care do not receive foster care benefits,
whereas a non-relative foster parent does. This requires the
relative to balance the need to provide an immediate and safe
environment for a related child against the limitation of
receiving financial assistance to help support the child. This
can be especially problematic if the relative caregiver is
low-income or lives on a fixed income.
Analysis Prepared by : Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)
319-2081