BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1893
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 14, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                AB 1893 (Stone and Eggman) - As Amended:  May 1, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:11-4

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires sharps sold to the general public to be sold  
          with a sharps waste container that meets specified criteria.  

          It also encourages the administrative director of the Division  
          of Workers' Compensation (DWC) within the Department of  
          Industrial Relations to incorporate the use of specific data  
          elements that can identify puncture wounds caused by sharps in  
          non-healthcare occupations.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)This bill results in cost pressure on the Medi-Cal program to  
            cover sharps containers.  Although this bill does not require  
            the state or health insurance plans to cover the costs of  
            containers, it is likely the state would cover the cost of  
            containers, as not covering the cost could pose a barrier to  
            care for chronic conditions like diabetes.  In addition,  
            federal rules limit the cost-sharing that can be imposed in  
            Medicaid programs to a nominal amount per service.  To the  
            extent a Medi-Cal enrollee was required to purchase sharps and  
            that purchase price was greater than nominal, it would amount  
            to a de facto cost-sharing requirement in Medi-Cal that  
            exceeded federal limits.  In addition, it is unclear whether  
            federal approval may be necessary to impose this requirement  
            on Medi-Cal enrollees and, if so, if it would be granted.

            The California Health Interview Survey indicates there are  
            53,000 Medicaid-only enrollees who take insulin for diabetes,  
            for example.  Assuming 2 containers per year are provided to  
            each person with diabetes at $2.50 per container, cost  
            pressure of $260,000 annually (GF/federal).  Costs would  








                                                                  AB 1893
                                                                  Page  2

            likely be larger, as this estimate would exclude individuals  
            with other conditions.  If, on the other hand, Medi-Cal does  
            not cover the costs associated with containers and this bill  
            resulted in reduced access to medications required to control  
            chronic conditions, costs for Medi-Cal services related to  
            treating uncontrolled diabetes, for example, could be much  
            greater. 

          2)One-time cost pressure to DWC potentially exceeding $50,000 to  
            upgrade data collection systems and develop processes to  
            incorporate data elements that allow for collection of data on  
            puncture wounds caused by sharps in non-healthcare  
            occupations. The bill is permissive and does not require DWC  
            to collect this data.  However, to the extent DWC does,  
            additional costs will be incurred.


           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . According to the author, this bill is intended to  
            reduce cost to taxpayers, reduce needlestick injuries, and  
            help sharps users comply with current disposal laws by  
            ensuring that sharps users have proper disposal containers,  
            and are more informed of how to dispose of them. 

           2)Background  . An estimated one million Californians inject  
            medications outside traditional health care facilities, which  
            generate approximately 389 million sharps each year. The  
            numbers of patients using injectable medications is projected  
            to grow as prevalence of diabetes increases. The most common  
            home use of sharps is to manage diabetes. Other reasons to  
            home-inject include allergies, infertility, arthritis,  
            hepatitis, HIV, blood clotting disorders, migraines and  
            cancer. California was one of the first states to address the  
            problems of sharps disposal with the passage of SB 1305  
            (Figueroa, Chapter 64, Statutes of 2006), which prohibited the  
            disposal of medical sharps in California's landfills. Although  
            illegal, most of these used needles still end up in household  
            trash and pose a significant risk of injury and infection to  
            children, custodial workers and solid waste employees. 

           3)Current Efforts  . Many pharmacies, hospitals, and local  
            household hazardous waste programs accept home-generated  
            sharps waste.   Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery  
            (CalRecycle) states it is working to help develop a safe,  








                                                                  AB 1893
                                                                  Page  3

            convenient, and cost-effective infrastructure for collecting  
            and properly disposing of home-generated sharps waste.   
            Pursuant to SB 486 (Simitian), Chapter 591, Statutes of 2009,  
            CalRecycle currently collects information on manufacturer  
            actions to provide for the safe collection and proper disposal  
            of the waste devices, and to educate consumers about safe  
            sharps management and collection opportunities.  CalRecycle  
            also maintains a web-based search function consumers can use  
            to locate legal disposal sites for sharps waste.   

           4)Cost-Sharing in Medicaid  . Cost-sharing for individuals under  
            100% of the federal poverty level, which comprises the  
            majority of enrollees, is generally limited to "nominal"  
            amounts established in federal regulations.  Services also  
            cannot be withheld for failure to pay.  For prescription drugs  
            specifically, states are allowed to charge copayments of up to  
            $3.90, with some exceptions for those enrollees over 150% of  
            the FPL.  However, research shows that cost sharing can act as  
            a barrier to obtaining health care services, particularly for  
            individuals with low-incomes and significant health care  
            needs.      

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081