BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1922
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1922 (Gomez)
          As Amended  May 13, 2014
          Majority vote 

           WATER, PARKS & WILDLIFE     10-3LOCAL GOVERNMENT    8-1         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Rendon, Bocanegra, Fong,  |Ayes:|Achadjian, Levine, Alejo, |
          |     |Frazier, Gatto, Gomez,    |     |Bradford, Gordon, Mullin, |
          |     |Gonzalez, Gray,           |     |Rendon, Waldron           |
          |     |Rodriguez, Yamada         |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Bigelow, Allen, Beth      |Nays:|Wagner                    |
          |     |Gaines                    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      13-4                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford,                 |     |                          |
          |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |     |                          |
          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Holden,    |     |                          |
          |     |Linder, Pan, Quirk,       |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Weber      |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Bigelow, Donnelly, Jones, |     |                          |
          |     |Wagner                    |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Defines a greenway as a non-motorized pedestrian,  
          bicycle, and recreational travel corridor that parallels an  
          urban waterway and allows a city, county, or combination of  
          other local governmental entities to designate lands as a  
          greenway and include a greenway in the local open-space element  
          of a county or city general plan.  Allows a nonprofit that has  
          as its primary purpose the development of a greenway, as  
          defined, to acquire and hold conservation easements.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Makes findings that include, but are not limited to,  








                                                                  AB 1922
                                                                  Page  2


            acknowledging that open-space land is necessary for the  
            maintenance and economy of the state as well as providing  
            relief from urban congestion, exercise, and appreciation of  
            wildlife species and habitats.

          2)Finds that, among other benefits, the linear nature of  
            greenways along natural watercourses helps to connect  
            neighborhoods, reduce dependence on automobiles, complement  
            and enhance public amenities, attract residents and visitors,  
            and provide services, especially to underserved communities.

          3)States that the intent of the Legislature in enacting the  
            Greenway Development and Sustainment Act (Act) is to promote  
            the development of greenways along rivers in the state,  
            including the development of a greenway along the Los Angeles  
            River (LA River).

          4)Defines a greenway as, among other characteristics, a  
            pedestrian and bicycle, non-motorized vehicle transportation,  
            and recreational travel corridor with specified requirements.

          5)Allows that a city, county, or other local government entity  
            may designate its lands along a river as a greenway and seek  
            appropriate public or private funding to develop the greenway.  
             

          6)Adds greenways to the definition of what can be included in  
            the open-space element of a county or city general plan.

          7)Allows a California 501(c)(3) nonprofit that has as its  
            primary purpose greenway development to acquire and hold  
            conservation easements.

          8)Provides that where state funding is provided for greenway  
            development under the Act, priority shall be given to a city,  
            county, or other local government entity that obtains funding  
            under the Federal Land Access Program (FLAP).
           
           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, there will be negligible, if any, state costs.

           COMMENTS :  Many people outside of Los Angeles might not realize  
          that the wide concrete channel featured in many films,  
          television series, and music videos is actually the LA River.  








                                                                  AB 1922
                                                                  Page  3


          For much of the year the river is a trickle and the culvert is  
          dry, which makes it a convenient set location to stage races,  
          car chases, and gang scenes.

          The LA River is 51 miles long, contained entirely within the  
          County of Los Angeles, and passes through 13 cities, including  
          32 miles that stretch across the City of Los Angeles until it  
          eventually reaches Long Beach Harbor.  Although planners had  
          envisioned greenbelts interconnecting parklands along the river  
          as early as the 1930s, renewed interest in the revitalization  
          and re-integration of the river and its tributaries into  
          adjacent neighborhoods began in the mid-to-late 1980s  
          accompanied by a growing recognition that compared to other  
          large American cities Los Angeles has relatively fewer parks,  
          particularly in under-represented communities.  In 1996, the  
          County of Los Angeles adopted the Los Angeles River Master Plan  
          (Master Plan), which includes four core principles: revitalizing  
          the river's ecological and hydrological functions while  
          maintaining its flood control requirements; creating a green  
          ribbon through the city; capturing opportunities to benefit  
          neighboring communities; and, improving the quality of life.  

          In September 2010, the United States Environmental Protection  
          Agency designated the LA River a "traditional navigable  
          waterway" protected under the Clean Water Act and many federal  
          programs including the America's Great Outdoors initiative, the  
          Urban Waters Federal Partnership, and the federal Urban Wildlife  
          Refuge Initiative have focused on its revitalization. September  
          2013 the Army Corps of Engineers, in conjunction with the City  
          of Los Angeles, released a Draft Integrated Feasibility Report  
          for the Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Study (Report)  
          that evaluates alternatives for restoring approximately 11 miles  
          of the LA River from Griffith Park to downtown Los Angeles and  
          providing passive recreation. The Report is still under review  
          by the Army Corps.

          Multiple prior legislative attempts have focused attention on  
          the LA River.  SB 1201 (De Le�n), Chapter 212, Statutes of 2012,  
          amended the Los Angeles Flood Control Act to include  
          recreational and educational purposes.  SCR 101 (Pavley),  
          Chapter 106, Statutes of 2012, honored governmental and  
          non-governmental partners for parks and restoration projects  
          along the LA River and its San Fernando Valley tributaries. AB  
          735 (Gomez) of 2013, was a Greenway Initiative that included  








                                                                  AB 1922
                                                                  Page  4


          developing an LA River greenway.  AB 735 was held in the  
          Assembly Appropriations Committee.  

          The author states that this bill will take necessary steps  
          towards greenway development in California by both defining  
          greenways and ensuring those projects are eligible for the FLAP  
          program funds which, among other uses, provide funds for  
          continuous transportation corridors. In addition, the author  
          states that this bill will allow nonprofit organizations to  
          obtain conservation easements to facilitate greenway projects.   
          The author advises that greenways can improve the quality of  
          life in communities by providing connectivity between them and  
          important recreational, open space, wildlife, flood management,  
          water quality, air quality, transportation, emergency response,  
          and urban waterfront revitalization opportunities.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Tina Cannon Leahy / W., P. & W. / (916)  
          319-2096 


                                                                FN: 0003415