BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1930 (Skinner)
          As Amended  May 13, 2014
          Majority vote 

           HUMAN SERVICES      5-0         APPROPRIATIONS      14-3        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Stone, Maienschein,       |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |
          |     |Ammiano,                  |     |Bradford,                 |
          |     |Ian Calderon, Garcia      |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |
          |     |                          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Holden,    |
          |     |                          |     |Linder, Pan, Quirk,       |
          |     |                          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |
          |     |                          |     |Weber                     |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Bigelow, Donnelly, Jones  |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Improves access to CalFresh benefits for eligible,  
          needy college students.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)States the intent of the Legislature to increase college  
            graduation rates of low-income Californians and to reduce the  
            incidence of economic hardship and hunger among low-income  
            college students.

          2)Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS), in  
            consultation with the office of the Chancellor of the  
            California Community Colleges, offices of the Chancellor of  
            the California State University, University of California  
            Chancellors' offices, the California Workforce Investment  
            Board, county human services agencies, advocates and other  
            stakeholders, as specified, to establish a protocol to screen  
            CalFresh applicants for all potential exemptions to the  
            CalFresh student work rule, and to identify and verify  
            participation in the Community College Expended Opportunity  
            Programs and Services (EOPS) or other educational programs  
            that would exempt a student from the student work requirement.

          3)Requires county human services agencies to screen students  
            applying for CalFresh for all potential exemptions to the  
            student work requirement pursuant to the newly established  








                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  2


            protocol. 

          4)Requires students participating in the EOPS, as specified, to  
            be considered exempt from the CalFresh student work  
            requirement, unless prohibited by federal law.

          5)Clarifies human services agency duties pertaining to use of  
            the newly established screening protocol, and clarifies that  
            the provisions of this bill shall not restrict or require the  
            use of federal funds for the financing of CalFresh Employment  
            and Training programs.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes, under federal law, the Supplemental Nutrition  
            Assistance Program (SNAP), pursuant to the Food Stamp Act of  
            1964 and subsequent revisions, and establishes, in California  
            law, the CalFresh program to administer the provision of  
            federal SNAP benefits to low-income families and individuals  
            meeting specified eligibility criteria.  (7 United States Code  
            Section 2011 et seq., Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC)  
            Section 18900 et seq.)

          2)Establishes, under federal law, eligibility requirements for  
            receipt of SNAP benefits, including income that is at or below  
            130% of the federal poverty level (FPL) and is determined to  
            be a substantial limiting factor in permitting a recipient to  
            obtain a more nutritious diet, as specified.  (7 Code of  
            Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 273.9) 



          3)Prohibits federal Food Stamp Program eligibility for an  
            individual who is enrolled at least half-time in an  
            institution of higher education unless the individual  
            qualifies for an exemption, as specified.  (7 CFR Section  
            273.5)


          4)Provides funding for community colleges that educate students  
            who are enrolled in the California Work Opportunity and  
            Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, such as designing  
            specific curriculum offerings, and creating work experience  
            and internships.  (Education Code (EDC) Sections 79202 and  








                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  3


            79203)


          5)Establishes EOPS to encourage local community colleges to  
            establish and implement programs that identify students who  
            face language, social, and economic barriers to education, and  
            to help those students achieve their educational objectives  
            and goals, as specified.  (EDC Section 69640)

          6)Defines extended opportunity program as a special program or  
            method of instruction designed to facilitate the language,  
            educational, or social development of a student and increase  
            his or her potential for success in the college.  Defines  
            extended opportunity services as a program of assistance  
            designed to aid students with socioeconomic barriers to  
            education to permit them to enroll in and participate in the  
            educational activities of the college, and to progress toward  
            completing their educational goals and objectives, including,  
            but not limited to, graduation from college.  (EDC Section  
            69642)

          7)Outlines the methods that a community college may extend  
            services to students including through loans or grants to  
            cover living costs, student fees, transportation and provision  
            of work experience programs and job placement.  (EDC Section  
            69650)

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)Minor and absorbable costs to DSS to develop the applicant  
            screening protocols.

          2)Potentially reimbursable costs to counties, likely minor, to  
            perform additional screening duties regarding CalFresh  
            applicants.  

           COMMENTS  :  This bill seeks to ensure needy students who are  
          actively participating in their education plans, and who meet  
          all other eligibility requirements for CalFresh, are adequately  
          screened for exemptions from federal work requirements for  
          students applying for or receiving SNAP benefits.

          CalFresh:  Nutrition benefits provided through the CalFresh  








                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  4


          program are funded entirely by the federal government through  
          the SNAP.  The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)  
          sets specific eligibility requirements for SNAP programs across  
          the United States, including gross and net income tests, work  
          requirements, and other documentation requirements.  CalFresh is  
          administered locally by county human services agencies, and the  
          federal, state, and county governments share in the cost of  
          administration of the program.  

          The maximum allowable gross income for CalFresh is 130% of the  
          FPL, and households with elderly or disabled members are not  
          subject to gross income criteria but must have a net monthly  
          income at or below 100% of the FPL.  Other households must meet  
          both gross and net monthly income tests.  The average monthly  
          benefit for a CalFresh recipient is $153.13 per month, or $5.10  
          per person per day.
           
           Food insecurity:  During the past decade, the number of families  
          experiencing food insecurity, meaning they lacked access to  
          enough food for a healthy life for all household members, has  
          increased.  Nationally, the USDA reported an estimated 14.5% of  
          American households were food insecure at least some time during  
          the year 2012.  According to data from the California Health  
          Interview Survey (CHIS), at least four million low-income  
          Californians struggled with food insecurity during 2011-12.  A  
          research brief published in 2012 by the University of  
          California, Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research and  
          the California Food Policy Advocates noted that in 2009, more  
          than four in 10 Californian adults, roughly 3.8 million people,  
          who were at or below 200% of the FPL suffered from food  
          insecurity.  Of those, more than one third, or 1.4 million  
          people, reported very low food security, meaning they  
          experienced having to cut back on food.  

          Evidence of the increasing number of food-insecure families in  
          recent years can be seen in the steady climb in the overall  
          CalFresh caseload, which increased by more than one million  
          people between 2010 and 2013, at the peak of the Great  
          Recession.  Still, California's SNAP participation rate has  
          lagged behind the rest of the nation for years, with only 57% of  
          eligible individuals enrolled in the program in 2011, compared  
          to a national average of 79%.  DSS notes that every $5 in  
          federal SNAP benefits is calculated to generate $9 of local  
          economic activity.








                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  5


           
           Hunger among students:  The problem of hunger on campus was  
          recently highlighted in an April 9, 2014, Washington Post  
          article, which described several students at various four-year  
          universities who quit their college meal plans in order to save  
          money to pay tuition, then found themselves hungry and barely  
          able to afford food.  The article noted that in 2007, Michigan  
          State University started a food bank on campus to help alleviate  
          hunger among students there.  Since then, another 120 colleges  
          and universities have created food banks on their own campuses.   
           

          A January 2014 study conducted by researchers from Oregon State  
          University, Western Oregon University and Benton County Health  
          Department found that six in 10 students on one Oregon  
          university campus were food insecure at least once in the prior  
          year.  The study, "Prevalence and Correlates of Food Insecurity  
          Among Students Attending a Midsize Rural University in Oregon,"  
          noted that a lower grade point average and fair to poor health  
          were factors associated with food concerns among the college  
          students surveyed.  Low income was also a factor, even for  
          students working more than 40 hours per week.


          Service coordination on community college campuses:  In an  
          effort to remove barriers to education for low-income students,  
          community college campuses throughout California deliver a  
          number of coordinated, campus-based services and programs and  
          work with human services agencies to ensure students are linked  
          to the support services for which they are eligible.  These  
          programs and services include:

          1)CalWORKs-eligible student parents on community college  
            campuses have access to academic, career and personal  
            counseling, as well as job development and placement services,  
            and other benefits, through coordination between the college  
            campuses and the counties;

          2)EOPS-academic and financial support is provided to community  
            college students whose educational and socioeconomic  
            backgrounds might otherwise hinder their academic success and  
            graduation.  EOPS include tutoring, education planning,  
            textbook and computer loans, and assistance transferring to a  
            four-year college or university; and








                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  6



          3)The Cooperative Agencies Resources for Education (CARE)-a  
            supplemental component of EOPS that specifically assists  
            single parents who are heads of CalWORKs households.

          SNAP student work rule:  Federal law prohibits students enrolled  
          at least half-time in a college or university from receiving  
          SNAP benefits unless they qualify for an exemption, even when  
          they meet all other eligibility requirements.  In general,  
          students are exempt from the prohibition if they are:

          1)Younger than age 18 or older than 50;

          2)Physically or mentally disabled;

          3)Receiving CalWORKs benefits;

          4)Enrolled in school as a result of participation in the Job  
            Opportunities and Basic Skills program;

          5)Employed in a paid position for a minimum of 20 hours per week  
            or, if self-employed, receiving weekly earnings at least equal  
            to the federal minimum wage multiplied by 20 hours;

          6)Participating in a state- or federally-financed work study  
            program during the regular school year;

          7)Participating in an on-the-job training program;

          8)Responsible for the care of a dependent household member under  
            the age of six;

          9)Responsible for the care of a dependent household member who  
            has reached the age of six but is under age 12 when the state  
            agency has determined that adequate child care is not  
            available to enable the student to attend class and comply  
            with the work requirements of items 5) or 6) above.

          10)A single parent enrolled in an institution of higher  
            education on a full-time basis (as determined by the  
            institution) and responsible for the care of a dependent child  
            under age 12; or, 

          11)Participating in a program under the Workforce Investment  








                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  7


            Act.

          The SNAP student work rule was originally developed to ensure  
          that benefits intended for hungry, low-income students don't go  
          to students who receive support from their families and who  
          wouldn't meet eligibility requirements if they weren't living  
          away from home and considered to be a household of one.  The  
          work requirement assumes that students who are actually needy  
          will engage in work programs to receive an income and be able to  
          better provide for themselves. 

          Need for this bill:  Throughout a student's life, hunger can be  
          a major barrier to learning and academic success.  Adding to the  
          daily stress most college students experience, the stress that  
          comes from food insecurity often lowers educational  
          participation, and decreases the probability that a student will  
          achieve his or her academic goals.  While the list of exemptions  
          to the student work rule is extensive, and even includes  
          additional employment and training programs that the USDA deems  
          appropriate, most students aren't aware of the exemptions for  
          which they qualify, nor is there currently a process to ensure  
          they are informed of the exemptions.  This bill requires the  
          development of a protocol for screening student CalFresh  
          applicants for available exemptions to the federal student work  
          rule; requires participation in EOPS to count as an exemption;  
          and requires counties to use the protocol and consideration of  
          EOPS participation to ensure needy students aren't denied the  
          nutrition assistance for which they are eligible.  

          According to the author, "This bill will result in fewer  
          [CalFresh] denials of eligible low-income college students, not  
          only reducing hunger, but bringing in much needed federal food  
          assistance to support disadvantaged students and reinforce our  
          state's investment in their education."
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Myesha Jackson / HUM. S. / (916)  
          319-2089 


                                                                FN: 0003531











                                                                  AB 1930
                                                                  Page  8