BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE BILL NO: ab 1957
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN AUTHOR: dickinson
VERSION: 3/6/14
Analysis by: Eric Thronson FISCAL: yes
Hearing date: June 17, 2014
SUBJECT:
Relinquishment of State Highway Route 16
DESCRIPTION:
This bill authorizes the California Transportation Commission
(CTC) to relinquish segments of State Route (SR) 16 in the City
of Sacramento as well as in the unincorporated portion of
Sacramento County.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
Identifies the California state highway system through a
description of segments of the state's regional and
interregional roads that are owned and operated by the
Department of Transportation (Caltrans).
Defines a "state highway" as any roadway that is acquired,
laid out, constructed, improved, or maintained as a state
highway according to legislative authorization.
Specifies that it is the intent of the Legislature for the
routes of the state highway system to connect the communities
and regions of the state and that they serve the state's
economy by connecting centers of commerce, industry,
agriculture, mineral wealth, and recreation.
Provides a two-step process for the state to expand or delete
a section of the state highway system that begins with the
Legislature amending existing law and then CTC making findings
that it is in the best interest of the state to include or
delete a specified portion of roadway from the system.
This bill :
AB 1957 (DICKINSON) Page 2
Authorizes CTC to relinquish to the City of Sacramento the
portion of SR 16 within its city limits, upon terms and
conditions approved by CTC.
Authorizes CTC to relinquish to Sacramento County the portion
of SR 16 within the unincorporated area of the county that is
east of the City of Sacramento and west of Watt Avenue, upon
terms and conditions approved by CTC.
Provides that the relinquishment will become effective the
date following the county recordation of the relinquishment
resolution.
Specifies that following the effective date of relinquishment,
the relinquished segment will no longer be a state highway and
may not be considered for future adoption as a state highway.
Requires the City of Sacramento and Sacramento County to:
o Ensure the continuity of traffic flow, including any
traffic signal progression, and to provide signage
directing motorists to the continuation of SR 16.
o Maintain the federal Surface Transportation Assistance
Act truck route designation for SR 16.
COMMENTS:
1.Purpose . According to the author, local and regional plans
include a major concentration of new development along the
corridor that will transform SR 16, also known as Jackson
Highway or Jackson Road, into a route of both interregional
and local significance. At this time, however, the state does
not have the resources to improve SR 16, nor does it have any
plans to do so. The author argues that without this bill, any
road improvement process would be cumbersome, inefficient, and
expensive because Caltrans would need to be involved in the
review and approval process. This bill enables the local
governments to convert the SR 16 corridor from a state highway
to an urban arterial consistent with local and regional
transportation plans.
2.Relinquishments . Each session, the Legislature passes and the
governor signs numerous bills authorizing CTC to relinquish
segments of the state highway system to local jurisdictions.
Relinquishment transactions are generally preceded by a
AB 1957 (DICKINSON) Page 3
negotiation of terms and conditions between the local
jurisdiction and Caltrans. Once an agreement has been
established, CTC typically approves the relinquishment and
verifies its approval via a resolution. Relinquishments can
be win-win as they provide recipient agencies with greater
control over a local segment of the state highway system and
relieve Caltrans of any further responsibility to improve,
maintain, or repair the segment.
Assembly Votes:
Floor:77-0
Appr: 17-0
Trans:15-0
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on
Wednesday, June 11,
2014.)
SUPPORT: City of Sacramento
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors
OPPOSED: None received.