BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 14, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 1990 (Gordon) - As Amended:  April 22, 2014

          Policy Committee:                               
          AgricultureVote:6-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill,  as proposed to be amended  , creates a legal framework  
          to permit "community food producers" (CFPs) to sell or provide  
          whole uncut fruits or vegetables or unrefrigerated eggs directly  
          to the public, certain permitted restaurants, and cottage food  
          producers.  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Defines "community food producer" as a producer of  
            agricultural products on land not zoned for agricultural use,  
            and clarifies a CFP is not a food facility under the cottage  
            food law.

          2)Requires CFP agricultural products be grown or produced in  
            compliance with the Health and Safety Code and other food  
            safety guidelines issued by a regulatory agency and either  
            labeled with the name and address of the CFP or accompanied by  
            "conspicuous signage" at the site of production and sale.

          3)Permits a public health enforcement officer (PHEO) to enter  
            and inspect a CFP's operation in response to a food recall or  
            safety complaint and recover reasonable costs for inspection;  
            permits the PHEO to issue a cease and desist order for  
            violations; allows a CFP to request a hearing to show cause  
            for the cease and desist order within 15 days of receipt.  

          4)Allows local governments to require community food producers  
            to register with their health enforcement offices; allows  
            local governments to pass ordinances that further limit or  
            prohibit the sale of CFP products.

          5)Establishes that violations of this chapter are a misdemeanor,  








                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  2

            punishable by a fine of $25 to $1,000 or by imprisonment in  
            county jail for a term not exceeding six months, or both.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Negligible fiscal impact to the California Department of  
            Public Health.

          2)Potentially minor enforcement costs to local public health  
            agencies, partially recoverable through inspection fees, with  
            any remainder likely reimbursable.
          




           COMMENTS  

          1)  Purpose.   According to the author, AB 1990 attempts to resolve  
            legal uncertainty among food producers and local agencies  
            regarding the direct sale of food products from various  
            non-agricultural properties without the express authorization  
            of local health enforcement agencies.  The bill provides  
            statewide guidance for oversight for food production at  
            various personal, community, school, and culinary gardens, and  
            authorizes the sale of community food products to the public.

            The bill also creates a statewide approach to providing  
            oversight of CFPs and reduces demands on local governments to  
            adopt individual ordinances.  Local municipalities remain free  
            to enact more restrictive ordinances, however, and there are  
            several local jurisdictions that have already adopted  
            ordinances to regulate the production and sale of community  
            food.

          2)  Urban and community agriculture.   According to a recent study  
            by the USDA, the growing interest in local and urban foods in  
            the US is the result of several different but related  
            movements.  Increasing focus on the environmental impacts of  
            food distribution, with long-distance transport contributing  
            to greater greenhouse gas emissions, has led consumers to give  
            greater consideration to the geographic dimensions of food  
            choices.  The community food-security movement has led certain  
            consumers and activists to seek to enhance access to safe,  
            healthy, and culturally appropriate food.








                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  3


            According to the University of Missouri, urban agriculture is  
            a means of combining the environmental, health, and  
            food-security movements with community-building activity.   
            Urban agriculture has the potential to revitalize of  
            communities that have a surplus of vacant land as well as  
            stimulate local economic activity.

          3)  Amendment.   The author has proposed to amend the current  
            version of the bill to clarify that local government health  
            enforcement offices may, but are not required to, establish  
            registration programs for community food producers in their  
            respective jurisdictions.





           Analysis Prepared by  :    Joel Tashjian / APPR. / (916) 319-2081