AB 2011, as amended, Daly. Information technology procurement: off-the-shelf software.
Existing lawbegin delete requires all contracts for the acquisition of information technology projects, as specified, to be made by or under the supervision of the Department of Technology.end deletebegin insert until January 1, 2015, establishes in state government the Department of Technology within the Government Operations supervised by the Director of Technology. Existing law requires the director, among other things, to advise the Governor on the strategic management and direction of the state’s information technology resources, to establish and enforce state information technology strategic plans, policies, standards, and enterprise architecture, and to produce an annual information technology strategic plan to guide the acquisition, management,
and use of information technology. Existing law provides that the department is responsible for the approval and oversight of information technology projects.end insert
This bill wouldbegin delete state that it is the intent of the Legislature to prioritize the use ofend deletebegin insert extend the operation of those provisions indefinitely. The bill would also require the department, on or before January 1, 2017, to submit a report end insertbegin insertto the Legislature on the effective use of commercial,end insert off-the-shelfbegin delete softwareend deletebegin insert technologyend insert
in information technology procurement.
Vote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 11545 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is
2amended to read:end insert
(a) (1) There is in state government the Department
4of Technology within the Government Operations Agency. The
5Director of Technology shall be appointed by, and serve at the
6pleasure of, the Governor, subject to Senate confirmation. The
7Director of Technology shall supervise the Department of
8Technology and report directly to the Governor on issues relating
9to information technology.
10(2) Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, whenever the
11term “office of the State Chief Information Officer” or “California
12Technology Agency” appears in any statute, regulation, or contract,
13or any other code, it shall be construed to refer to the Department
14of Technology, and whenever the term “State Chief Information
15Officer” or “Secretary of
California Technology” appears in any
16statute, regulation, or contract, or any other code, it shall be
17construed to refer to the Director of Technology.
18(3) The Director of Technology shall be the State Chief
19Information Officer.
20(b) The duties of the Director of Technology shall include, but
21are not limited to, all of the following:
22(1) Advising the Governor on the strategic management and
23direction of the state’s information technology resources.
24(2) Establishing and enforcing state information technology
25strategic plans, policies, standards, and enterprise architecture.
26This shall include the periodic review and maintenance of the
27information technology sections of the State Administrative
28Manual, except for sections on information technology
procurement
29procedures, and information technology fiscal policy. The Director
30of Technology shall consult with the Director of General Services,
31the Director of Finance, and other relevant agencies concerning
32policies and standards these agencies are responsible to issue as
33they relate to information technology.
P3 1(3) Minimizing overlap, redundancy, and cost in state operations
2by promoting the efficient and effective use of information
3technology.
4(4) Providing technology direction to agency and department
5chief information officers to ensure the integration of statewide
6technology initiatives, compliance with information technology
7policies and standards, and the promotion of the alignment and
8effective management of information technology services. Nothing
9in this paragraph shall be deemed to limit the authority of a
10constitutional officer, cabinet agency secretary, or
department
11director to establish programmatic priorities and business direction
12to the respective agency or department chief information officer.
13(5) Working to improve organizational maturity and capacity
14in the effective management of information technology.
15(6) Establishing performance management and improvement
16processes to ensure state information technology systems and
17services are efficient and effective.
18(7) Approving, suspending, terminating, and reinstating
19information technology projects.
20(8) Performing enterprise information technology functions and
21services, including, but not limited to, implementing Geographic
22Information Systems (GIS), shared services, applications, and
23program and project management activities in partnership with the
24
owning agency or department.
25(c) The Director of Technology shall produce an annual
26information technology strategic plan that shall guide the
27acquisition, management, and use of information technology. State
28agencies shall cooperate with the department in the development
29of this plan, as required by the Director of Technology.
30(1) Upon establishment of the information technology strategic
31plan, the Director of Technology shall take all appropriate and
32necessary steps to implement the plan, subject to any modifications
33and adjustments deemed necessary and reasonable.
34(2) The information technology strategic plan shall be submitted
35to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by January 15 of every
36year.
37(d) The Director of Technology shall produce an
annual
38information technology performance report that shall assess and
39measure the state’s progress toward enhancing information
40technology human capital management; reducing and avoiding
P4 1costs and risks associated with the acquisition, development,
2implementation, management, and operation of information
3technology assets, infrastructure, and systems; improving energy
4efficiency in the use of information technology assets; enhancing
5the security, reliability, and quality of information technology
6networks, services, and systems; and improving the information
7technology procurement process. The department shall establish
8those policies and procedures required to improve the performance
9of the state’s information technology program.
10(1) The department shall submit an information technology
11performance management framework to the Joint Legislative
12Budget Committee by May 15, 2009, accompanied by the most
13current baseline data for each performance
measure or metric
14contained in the framework. The information technology
15performance management framework shall include the performance
16measures and targets that the department will utilize to assess the
17performance of, and measure the costs and risks avoided by, the
18state’s information technology program. The department shall
19provide notice to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee within
2030 days of making changes to the framework. This notice shall
21include the rationale for changes in specific measures or metrics.
22(2) State agencies shall take all necessary steps to achieve the
23targets set forth by the department and shall report their progress
24to the department on a quarterly basis.
25(3) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5, the information
26technology performance report shall be submitted to the Joint
27Legislative Budget Committee by January 15 of every year. To
28enhance transparency,
the department shall post performance
29targets and progress toward these targets on its public Internet Web
30site.
31(4) The department shall at least annually report to the Director
32of Finance cost savings and avoidances achieved through
33improvements to the way the state acquires, develops, implements,
34manages, and operates state technology assets, infrastructure, and
35systems. This report shall be submitted in a timeframe determined
36by the Department of Finance and shall identify the actual savings
37achieved by each office, department, and agency. Notwithstanding
38Section 10231.5, the department shall also, within 30 days, submit
39a copy of that report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee,
40the Senate Committee on Appropriations, the Senate Committee
P5 1on Budget and Fiscal Review, the Assembly Committee on
2Appropriations, and the Assembly Committee on Budget.
3(e) (1) The department, on or before January 1, 2017, shall
4submit a report to the Legislature on the effective use of
5commercial, off-the-shelf technology in information technology
6procurement.
7(2) The report shall be submitted in compliance with Section
89795 of the Government Code.
9(3) This subdivision shall become inoperative on January 1,
102019, pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.
11(e)
end delete
12begin insert(f)end insert If the Governor’s Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 2012 becomes
13effective, this section shall prevail over Section 186 of the
14Governor’s Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 2012, regardless of the
15dates on which this section and that plan take effect, and this
16section shall become operative on July 1, 2013.
begin insertSection 11548.5 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is repealed.end insert
This chapter shall remain in effect only until January
191, 2015, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted
20statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2015, deletes or extends
21that date.
It is the intent of the Legislature to prioritize the
23use of off-the-shelf software in information technology
24procurement.
O
98