BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 2022|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2022
          Author:   Medina (D)
          Amended:  8/18/14 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE BUSINESS, PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMM.  :  9-0, 6/16/14
          AYES:  Lieu, Wyland, Berryhill, Block, Corbett, Galgiani,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Torres
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  De Le�n, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Walters, Gaines
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  55-20, 5/28/14 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Public contracts:  Target Area Contract Preference  
          Act

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes changes to the Target Area Contract  
          Preference Act (TACPA) by redefining what qualifies as an  
          economically distressed area. 

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

           1. Establishes TACPA and expresses legislative intent that it  
             is a benefit to the state to encourage and facilitate job  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2022
                                                                     Page  
          2

             maintenance and development in distressed and declining areas  
             of cities and towns in California.  

           2. Authorizes the Department of General Services (DGS) to apply  
             TACPA to bids from businesses that agree to perform the  
             contract work in designated "distressed areas" by offering 5%  
             worksite and 1% to 4% workforce bidding preferences in  
             specified state service and commodity contracts valued in  
             excess of $100,000.  

           3. Defines a distressed area to be determined by the Governor's  
             Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as an urban area with  
             at least 3,000 people living in a cluster of census block  
             groups with each meeting at least five of eight criteria  
             including that the census block groups:  

              A.    Are in the upper quartile for having the least amount  
                of people over the age of 25 with a high school education;

              B.    Are in the upper quartile for highest unemployment  
                rate;

              C.    Are in the lowest quartile for per capita income;

              D.    Are in the upper quartile for having the highest  
                percentage of female head of households with children that  
                live in poverty;

              E.    Are in the upper quartile for having the greatest  
                percentage of people over the age of 65 living in poverty;

              F.    Are in the upper quartile for having the greatest  
                percentage of people under the age of 18 living in  
                poverty; and 

              G.    Are in the upper quartile for having the highest  
                population of nonwhites and Hispanics.

           4. Specifies that preference only applies to bidders who are  
             California-based firms.  

           5. Requires bidders to certify, under penalty of perjury, to  
             perform either 50% (for commodity contracts) or 90% (for  
             labor service contracts) of the labor hours in the eligible  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2022
                                                                     Page  
          3

             TACPA area worksite(s).  TACPA work sites may be in, directly  
             adjacent to, or within a directly adjoining census tract  
             blocks that form a contiguous boundary with the distressed  
             area.  

           6. Limits TACPA preferences to 9% or a maximum of $50,000 per  
             bid.  In combination with any other preferences, the maximum  
             limit is 15% of the lowest responsible bid; and in no case  
             more than $100,000 per bid.  

           7. Provides that TACPA preferences do not apply to contracts,  
             such as construction, where the worksite is fixed by the  
             contract terms.  

          This bill makes changes to TACPA by redefining what qualifies as  
          an economically distressed area.  Specifically, a "distressed  
          area" is in the top quartile of census tracts for having the  
          highest unemployment and poverty in the state as determined by  
          the Department of Finance (DOF). 

           Background
           
           TACPA  .  TACPA was enacted in 1983, as an effort by the  
          Legislature and the Governor to stimulate business development  
          in economically disadvantaged areas.  TACPA is primarily  
          administered by DGS with help from the Office of Planning and  
          Research (OPR).  Under TACPA, a 5% extra credit is awarded in  
          the contract bid evaluation phase to California firms that agree  
          to undertake the work in distressed areas and an additional 1%  
          to 4% may be included for committing to employ certain  
          individuals in completing the contract.  

          The geographic boundaries of the distressed areas are determined  
          by OPR based on eight statutorily defined criteria, as reported  
          at the census block level.  Recently, the availability of this  
          data has changed.  In 2003, the U.S. Census Bureau switched from  
          gathering socioeconomic data in the "long form" survey component  
          of the decennial census to an annual survey effort called the  
          American Community Survey (ACS).   

          In addition to the change in how the data was collected, the  
          U.S. Census Bureau no longer releases socioeconomic data for two  
          of the eight TACPA criteria at the block group level, although  
          it is released at the larger-scale census-tract level.  In  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2022
                                                                     Page  
          4

          evaluating whether to simply change statute from census block  
          group to census tract level, OPR and others questioned whether  
          the current criteria was best suited for an employment  
          incentive.  As an example, the existing locations include the  
          poverty level of people over 65 and children under the age of  
          18.  

          The California Research Bureau (CRB) produced a document in  
          2012, at the request of OPR to better understand the statistical  
          properties of past TACPA "distressed area" designations and of  
          the currently-available data from the ACS.  The goal of the  
          report was to identify and evaluate options for meeting the  
          goals of the TACPA program with the U.S. Census information  
          currently available.  The report found that current statute,  
          regulations, rules and guidelines do not clearly identify which  
          data should be used when constructing TACPA indicators, nor do  
          they provide guidance on how to determine eligibility when data  
          for any of the eight criteria are unavailable at the block-group  
          level.  The report also noted that survey data provided by the  
          Census Bureau has inherent sampling errors, missing data and  
          missing measures and recommended that the creation and  
          implementation of future rules, regulations and guidelines could  
          clarify how the TACPA program ought to address these issues.   
          CRB identified several potential strategies for approaching the  
          data, each of which produces generally similar results.  CRB  
          recommended that DGS adopt rules, regulations and guidelines  
          that identify the appropriate data to construct indicators of  
          each of the eight criteria, recognize and account for sampling  
          error, identify how to determine eligibility in the event that  
          data provided by the Census Bureau becomes unavailable, and  
          specify how to determine eligibility for block groups that are  
          missing data.

           Comments
           
          According to the author's office, this bill updates TACPA  
          geographic regions to those areas that DOF designates as having  
          the highest combined levels of poverty and unemployment in the  
          state.  According to the author, "changes in the type of  
          information collected in the last Census have not only made data  
          collection more time consuming and expensive to obtain, it has  
          also rendered the existing TACPA unworkable, therefore,  the  
          Department of General Services (DGS) has stopped considering  
          TACP preference in evaluating bids."  The author's office  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2022
                                                                     Page  
          5

          believes that this bill will allow TACPA to continue to work by  
          redefining what qualifies as an economically distressed area.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

           DGS indicates that it will incur first-year costs of $130,000  
            and ongoing annual costs of $113,000 (various funds). 

           Minor decennial savings to OPR related to eliminating the  
            workload of creating maps following each census.

           Unknown costs.  Revising the definition of distressed area  
            expands the eligible areas, and thus the number of firms,  
            eligible for a worksite bid preference under TACPA.  The cost  
            of the TACPA bid preference over the last four years has  
            averaged $110,000.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/13/14)

          AFSCME
          California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce
          Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses
          National Federation of Independent Businesses
          Veterans Caucus of the California Democratic Party

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to AFSCME, this bill will  
          ensure that state contractors are better incentivized to hire  
          unemployed individuals and work in distressed areas of the  
          state.

          The California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce notes that  
          targeted areas and areas in distressed communities need all the  
          help they can get in promoting jobs and economic growth because  
          of the high unemployment in those areas.  They believe that by  
          reflecting new census tracts, this bill will allow small  
          businesses in these areas to take advantage of state contracts.

          The Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses believes  
          that this bill is extremely critical to help ensure that the  
          TACPA continues to function as it was originally intended and  
          that TACPA has allowed coalition members to not only hire, but  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2022
                                                                     Page  
          6

          retrain members from these highly distressed communities who  
          would not work without this preference in place.

          According to the National Federation of Independent Businesses  
          (NFIB), this bill simply uses data currently compiled by DOF to  
          make workable a law already on the books.  NFIB notes that there  
          are few tools available to help targeted and poor areas in our  
          state and this bill addresses that problem.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  55-20, 5/28/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonilla,  
            Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau,  
            Chesbro, Cooley, Dababneh, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Garcia, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hall, Roger Hern�ndez,  
            Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Lowenthal, Medina,  
            Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Olsen, Pan, Perea, John A.  
            P�rez, V. Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting,  
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NOES:  Allen, Bigelow, Ch�vez, Conway, Dahle, Donnelly, Beth  
            Gaines, Gatto, Grove, Hagman, Jones, Logue, Maienschein,  
            Mansoor, Melendez, Nestande, Patterson, Wagner, Waldron, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Frazier, Gorell, Harkey, Weber, Vacancy


          MW:k  8/16/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****















                                                                CONTINUED