BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page A
          Date of Hearing:   April 29, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
                                  Mark Stone, Chair
                   AB 2035 (Chesbro) - As Amended:  April 21, 2014
           
          SUBJECT  :  Commercially and Sexually Exploited Children (CSEC)

           SUMMARY  :  Establishes the State Plan to Serve and Protect  
          Sexually Exploited and Trafficked Minors as well as other  
          conforming changes to add or align existing statute to implement  
          policies and procedures to respond to and address Commercially  
          and Sexually Exploited Children (CSEC).  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :    

          1)Establishes in statute the State Plan to Serve and Protect  
            Sexually Exploited and Trafficked Minors (State Plan) to  
            provide a framework for a coordinated effort and plan to serve  
            and protect sexually exploited and trafficked minors.

          2)Defines a "child trafficking victim" as an individual under  
            the age of 18 who meets any of the following conditions:

             a)   Is a victim of human trafficking, as specified;

             b)   Is involved in prostitution, pornography, or stripping;  
               or

             c)   Is engaged in survival sex, which is defined as the  
               exchange of sex for money or other considerations,  
               including food or shelter, in order to ensure his or her  
               survival.

          3)Permits a juvenile court to adjudge a child a dependent of the  
            court if he or she is a victim of sexual exploitation,  
            receives food or shelter for, or is paid to perform, sexual  
            acts, and the parent or guardian fails or is unable to protect  
            the child, as specified. 

          4)Requires the California Health and Human Services (HHS) Agency  
            to convene an interagency workgroup (workgroup), in  
            consultation with the California Child Welfare Council (CWC)  
            no later than January 30, 2015, to include:

             a)   California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS);









                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page B

             b)   Children and Family Services Division of the California  
               Department of Social Services (DSS);

             c)   Division of Juvenile Justice in the California  
               Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR);

             d)   California Department of Education (CDE); and

             e)   A broad spectrum of stakeholders who are responsible for  
               addressing the needs of this population, including but not  
               limited to local government agencies, human trafficking  
               services providers, the California Mental Health Directors  
               Association, county probation officers, the County Welfare  
               Directors Association (CWDA), youth advocates, court  
               representatives, and human trafficking survivors.

          5)Requires the workgroup to do all of the following:

             a)   Conduct a thorough review of existing programs and  
               services for child trafficking victims to identify areas of  
               need and develop strategies and recommendations, as  
               specified, to ensure that child trafficking victims have  
               access to services and supports need for their safety and  
               recovery;

             b)   Develop, in collaboration with the Child Welfare  
               Council, and submit no later than January 30, 2016 a  
               comprehensive state plan to serve and protect sexually  
               exploited and trafficked minors, to the Legislature,  
               Judicial Council, and the Governor, which shall include:

               i)     An evaluation of juvenile court jurisdiction  
                 pertaining to child trafficking, including the adequacy  
                 of existing jurisdictional statuses, as specified, and  
                 recommendations for necessary changes;

               ii)    A multiagency coordinated trafficking response  
                 protocol and guidelines for local implementation to  
                 address the needs of CSEC and clear lines of ongoing  
                 responsibilities among local agencies;

               iii)   If new specialized services and programs are needed  
                 to ensure that child trafficking victims have access to  
                 safe and appropriate services, the identification of  









                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page C
                 funding sources and a timeline for the creation of those  
                 services and programs;

               iv)    The identification of training needs for child  
                 welfare staff, law enforcement, court, educational  
                 agencies, and probation staff on child trafficking  
                 response protocols and services, and a plan and timeline  
                 to implement necessary training; and

               v)     The development of data collection and sharing  
                 protocols among agencies.

          6)In development of the plan, requires the workgroup to consider  
            the following:

             a)   Existing laws and practices in other states and  
               jurisdictions that have developed response protocols and  
               policies to respond to sexual exploitation of minors and  
               child trafficking, and the outcomes and unintended  
               consequences of those protocols and policies; and

             b)   The adequacy of existing response protocols and  
               services, including identification, screening, assessment,  
               immediate and safe shelter, and the range of treatment  
               options for child trafficking victims.

          7)Adds to the duties of the CWC the requirement to provide  
            recommendations and updates to the State Plan.

          8)Requires instruction on cultural competency and sensitivity  
            relating to, and best practices for, providing adequate care  
            to sexually exploited and trafficked minors in out-of-home  
            care to be included in the following training programs:

             a)   Group home administrator certification training  
               programs;

             b)   Pre and post-placement foster parent certified training  
               programs;

             c)   Community college relative and nonrelative extended  
               family member (NREFM) foster care education programs; and

             d)   Mandated reporter training programs.










                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page D
           EXISTING LAW   

          1)States that the purpose of foster care law is to provide  
            maximum safety and protection for children who are currently  
            being physically, sexually, emotionally abused, neglected, or  
            exploited, and to ensure the safety, protection, and physical  
            and emotional well-being of children who are at risk of harm.   
            (WIC 300.2)

          2)States the intent of the Legislature to preserve and  
            strengthen a child's family ties whenever possible and to  
            reunify a foster youth with his or her biological family  
            whenever possible, or to provide a permanent placement  
            alternative, such as adoption or guardianship.  (WIC 396)

          3)Permits the juvenile court to adjudge a minor to be a  
            dependent of the court if he or she has suffered, or there is  
            a substantial risk that the child will suffer, serious  
            physical harm or illness, as a result of the failure or  
            inability of his or her parent or guardian to adequately  
            supervise or protect the child.  (WIC 300)

          4)Permits the juvenile court to adjudge a minor a ward of the  
            court if he or she violates any state or federal law or any  
            city or county ordinance.  (WIC 602)

          5)Establishes sexual abuse as a crime and defines it as sexual  
            assault or sexual exploitation, which includes rape, statutory  
            rape, rape in concert, incest, sodomy, lewd or lascivious acts  
            upon a child, oral copulation, sexual penetration, coerced  
            prostitution of a child, participation or the production and  
            dissemination of child pornography, or child molestation.  (PC  
            11165.1)

          6)Establishes prostitution as a crime and defines it as anyone  
            who engages in sexual conduct in exchange for money or other  
            considerations.  (PC 653.20)

          7)Pursuant to Proposition 35 (California 2012) provides for all  
            of the following:  

              a)   Any person who causes, induces, or persuades a minor to  
               engage in a commercial sexual act, as specified, is guilty  
               of human trafficking to be punishable by imprisonment in  
               state prison, as specified; (PC 236.1(c))  









                                                                 AB 2035
                                                                  Page E

              b)   Consent by a victim of human trafficking who is a minor,  
               and mistake of fact as to the age of the victim, is not a  
               defense to criminal prosecution; (PC 236.1 (e) and (f))  
                
             c)   Evidence that a victim of human trafficking, as defined,  
               has engaged in any commercial sexual act as a result of  
               being a victim of human trafficking is inadmissible to  
               prove the victim's criminal liability for that activity;  
               (EC 1161)  

              d)   Law enforcement agencies shall consider specified  
               indicators of human trafficking when a peace officer comes  
               into contact with a minor who has engaged in a commercial  
               sex act; and (PC 236.2)  

              e)   Law enforcement officers assigned field or investigative  
               duties shall complete a minimum of two hours of training  
               pertaining to the handling of victims of human trafficking  
               by July 2014.  (PC 13519.14)  
             
          8)Establishes the California Child Welfare Council to serve as  
            an advisory body responsible for improving the collaboration  
            and processes of the multiple agencies and the courts that  
            service the children and youth in the child welfare and foster  
            care systems.  (W&I Code 16540)  

           9)Requires the California Department of Social Services (DSS) to  
            develop and establish a certification program to ensure that  
            group home administrators have appropriate training.  (H&S  
            Code 1522.41)  

           10)Requires licensed foster parents to complete no less than 12  
            hours of foster parent training, prior to the placement of any  
            foster children and a minimum of eight hours of foster parent  
            training annually.  (H&S Code 1529.2)  

          11)Permits the counties of Alameda and Los Angeles to establish  
            a sexually exploited minors pilot project to develop a  
            comprehensive, replicative, multidisciplinary model to address  
            the needs and effective treatment of commercially sexually  
            exploited minors who have been arrested or detained by local  
            law enforcement for specified crimes.  (W&I Code 18259 and  
            18529.7)










                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page F
           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  Commercial sexual exploitation (CSE) of children is  
          defined as the sexual exploitation of children entirely, or at  
          least primarily, for financial or other economic reasons.  Under  
          this definition, the economic exchanges may be either monetary  
          or non-monetary (i.e., for food, shelter, drugs).<1>  Sex  
          trafficking of minors is defined as the "recruitment, harboring,  
          transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for the  
          purpose of a commercial sex act" where the person is a U.S.  
          citizen or lawful permanent resident under the age of 18  
          years.<2>

          According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), there  
          are an estimated 100,000 children in the United States who are  
          abducted, manipulated or forced into prostitution and sexual  
          exploitation each year, and another 300,000 or more who are at  
          risk of commercial sexual exploitation.  However, it is likely  
          that this number is much greater due to the difficulty in  
          identifying commercially and sexually exploited children.  It is  
          also estimated that anywhere between 50 and 80% of all children  
          who are commercially or sexually exploited are or have at one  
          time or another been involved with child welfare. 

          It is important to acknowledge the severe emotional and  
          psychological trauma a child undergoes when they are a victim of  
          sexual exploitation.  Although it is reasonable to presume that  
          a child would seek escape or attempt to run away from his or her  
          abuser, for children who are commercially or sexually exploited,  
          oftentimes they have already run away from an undesirable  
          situation.  Hungry, seeking a way to survive, and otherwise  
          facing the world alone, many CSEC are taken in, either through  
          abduction or coercion, and exploited by individuals who make  
          promises of caring and protection.  This can result in CSEC  
          becoming willing participants in their own exploitation, where  
          the psychological trauma they suffer is similar to the trauma  
          ---------------------------
          ---------------------------
          <1> Estes and Weiner. "The Commercial Sexual Exploitation of  
          Children In the U. S., Canada and Mexico." Univ. of PA, 2002.  
           http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/restes/CSEC_Files/Exec_Sum_020220.pdf  
          <2> Smith et al. "The National Report on Domestic Minor Sex  
          Trafficking: America's Prostituted Youth." Shared Hope Int'l,  
          2009. 
           http://sharedhope.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/SHI_National_Rep 
          ort_on_DMST_2009.pdf 








                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page G






















































                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page H
          that occurs in domestic violence victims.<3>  Many CSEC display  
          symptoms of and suffer from Stockholm Syndrome, described as a  
          paradoxical psychological phenomenon where a positive bond  
          between hostage and captor occurs when the hostage views the  
          perpetrator as giving life by simply not taking it.

           Child Welfare Services (CWS) - Dependency and Probation  :  In  
          California, there are generally two avenues that lead to a child  
          entering the state's child welfare or probation system.  The  
          first is through child protective services.  The other is  
          through law enforcement and county probation services.  The  
          difference between the two is whether the child is at risk of  
          abuse, neglect or abandonment, or if the youth has been alleged  
          of committing a crime. 

          In cases where a child is suspected to be a victim of abuse,  
          neglect or abandonment, a county child welfare agency's (CWA)  
          child protective services social worker is required to  
          immediately investigate the complaint to determine its validity.  
           If suspected abuse, neglect or abandonment is found to be  
          valid, a child protective services social worker may remove the  
          child from the family and place the child into temporary  
          custody.  Soon after that, before the juvenile court, the CWA is  
          required to recommend whether the child should become a  
          dependent of the state, can be immediately returned to their  
          family with or without court supervision, or placed into out of  
          home care, i.e. foster care.  Once placed into foster care, the  
          child is provided a case plan that outlines his or her  
          placement, an array of services that he or she needs, and  
          assigned a social worker who is responsible for his or her  
          wellbeing, with the ultimate goal of reunifying the child with  
          their family or seeking a permanent placement, such as legal or  
          kinship guardianship or adoption. 

          For youth who are engaged by law enforcement due to an  
          allegation that the youth has committed a crime, a law  
          enforcement officer can take the child into temporary custody.   
          If the law enforcement is able and the crime is not serious,  
          generally the youth can be returned to their family if that is  
          in the child's best interest.  However, if it is not in the  
          child's best interest to return the child his or her home,  
          where, for example, the child has no parent or relative to  

          ---------------------------
          <3> Website: Motivating, Inspiring, Supporting, and Serving  
          Sexually Exploited Youth. "Who is a CSEC - CSEC: Framing the  
          Issue"  http://www.misssey.org/csec.html#reference  








                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                 Page I
          return to, the minor is destitute and has no home, or returning  
          the child to the home would result in his or her abuse or  
          neglect, the child can be transferred to the custody of a county  
          probation officer.  Upon adjudication of the youth for his or  
          her crime, typically, unless the crime is of a serious or  
          heinous nature, the youth is assigned to probation and placed  
          into a juvenile court facility, i.e. juvenile hall, or some  
          other form of appropriate yet secured facility.  Similar to  
          dependency, a ward is provided a case plan that outlines his or  
          her needs, placement and services.  

           The struggle to appropriately address and serve CSEC  :  One of  
          the primary challenges California faces today is the ability to  
          appropriately identify, address and serve CSEC.  Although CSEC  
          are victims and not perpetrators of sex crimes, many youth do  
          not enter into dependency, but rather, have been arrested and  
          adjudicated as a ward of the court because, according to first  
          responders, law enforcement, and CWAs, our CWS lacks the  
          adequate ability to respond to and provide for CSEC.  According  
          to a national report on "Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking -  
          America's Prostituted Children," issued by Shared Home  
          International and funded by a grant from the US Department of  
          Justice: 

               Law enforcement officers report they are often compelled to  
               charge a victim of domestic minor sex trafficking with a  
               delinquency offense in order to detain her in a secured  
               facility to keep her safe from the trafficker/pimp and the  
               trauma-driven response of flight? The results are  
               detrimental for the victim who rarely receives any services  
               in detention, much less services specific to the trauma  
               endured through sex trafficking.  Also, the entry of the  
               juvenile into the delinquency system can disqualify her  
               from accessing victim of crime funds for services in some  
               states.<4>

          This creates a paradigm whereby CSEC, who have been habitually  
          and repeatedly entrapped, forced to exchange sexual actions in  
          return for survival, is rescued by law enforcement, but is then  
          placed into another form of entrapment, e.g. incarceration,  
          ---------------------------
          <4> Smith, Linda A., et al. The National Report on Domestic  
          Minor Sex Trafficking: America's Prostituted Children. Shared  
          Hope International.  
           http://sharedhope.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/SHI_National_Rep 
          ort_on_DMST_2009.pdf  








                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page J
          because that is the only viable option law enforcement has to  
          protect CSEC from their abusers. 

          Some argue that the need to charge CSEC with a crime in order to  
          provide a safer and more secure environment through  
          incarceration is in direct correlation to the lack of a  
          community based infrastructure and the state statute's  
          prohibition on locked or otherwise secure facilities.  For those  
          CWAs that do have systems and protocols in place to serve CSEC,  
          it is argued that it has taken years to have done so and only by  
          leveraging other resources outside of the CWS.  

          It is important to acknowledge the current deficiencies within  
          California's CWS, e.g. inadequate fiscal resources, shortage of  
          staff and personnel, and lack of training and experience to  
          address and respond to a difficult to serve population.   
          However, it is equally as important, if not more, to acknowledge  
          that the current process of arresting a CSEC can result in the  
          re-victimization of the youth and lead to his or her  
          self-confirmation that he or she violated the law and is not a  
          victim of commercial and sexual exploitation.

           CWDA budget proposal  :  In response to the growing crisis of CSEC  
          and to build a stronger services infrastructure to serve CSEC  
          through dependency, the CWDA has requested an allocation of  
          $20.3 million in state general fund dollars for the 2014-15  
          budget year and $14.3 million in ongoing funds each year  
          thereafter.  Because county CWAs are required to match general  
          fund expenditures on a one-to-one basis, this would result in  
          $40.6 million in total funds to be allocated in 2014-15 and  
          $28.5 million in total funds beginning in 2015-16, and annually  
          thereafter, to help better serve CSEC.

          CWDA and other children's advocacy organizations have requested  
          this funding to build capacity in local county CWAs to serve  
          child victims of commercial sexual exploitation. 

           Need for the Bill  :  In 2011 the California CWC convened a  
          workgroup to assess and review how the state responds to and  
          addresses CSEC, and to provide recommendations on how to improve  
          and enhance services to CSEC.  The workgroup was made up of an  
          inclusive and wide array of public and private social services  
          organizations, mental health, education, law enforcement,  
          health, community based organizations, the courts and child  
          advocacy groups.  After 18 months of collaboration the workgroup  









                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page K
          released a report entitled "Ending the Commercial Sexual  
          Exploitation of Children:  A Call for Multi-System Collaboration  
          in California," which concludes that "California must develop a  
          comprehensive and collaborative response to ensure CSE victims  
          are identified and receive the services they need to overcome  
          trauma and live health, productive lives."  This measure is a  
          direct result of the recommendations from this report. 

          Writing in support of this measure, the Westcoast Children's  
          Clinic states:

               Additionally, [this bill] will ensure that youth who have  
               been commercially sexually exploited or trafficked can gain  
               access to supports and services through the dependency  
               system.  Currently in the state of California, these child  
               victims are arrested and funneled through the juvenile  
               delinquency system for crimes their traffickers force them  
               to commit.  This bill clarifies that a child who is a  
               victim of sexual exploitation and trafficking falls under  
               the dependency court's jurisdiction, facilitating access to  
               the service system that is designed to support their needs  
               as a victim rather than a criminal. 

               [This bill] takes critical steps toward enacting the  
               comprehensive and urgent response that this problem (CSEC)  
               merits.  Specifically, under the auspices of the California  
               Health and Human Services Agency, an interagency workgroup  
               will assess the adequacy of the services, supports and  
                                                                   systems available to meet the unique needs of sexually  
               exploited and trafficked youth.  The workgroup will  
               subsequently develop a coordinated response to fill system  
               gaps and recommend policy changes where necessary. 

          Additionally, writing in support of this bill as its sponsor,  
          the Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking (CAST) writes:

               Caring for our children through the dependency system cost  
               significantly less than providing services through the  
               delinquency system where many of these children are ending  















                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page L
               up now.<5> Additionally, given that recent reports have  
               indicated that 55-85% of children arrested for prostitution  
               are identified as CSEC have had contact with the child  
               dependency system there will likely not be an overwhelming  
               influx of new cases into the dependency system with the  
               passage of this measure.<6> In fact hopefully what will  
               occur is that earlier identification and prevention of this  
               problem will save the state additional resources. In fact a  
               recent report in Minnesota shows that investing in early  
               identification and providing services to these children  
               could save the state of California funds in the future. The  
               report highlights that a state can save $34 for every $1  
               spent on this issue.<7>

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Children's Advocacy Institute (CAI)  
          California Alliance of Child and family Services
          California Coalition for Youth (CCY) 
          California Youth Connection (CYC) 
          Children's Defense Fund of CA (CDF-CA) 
          Children's Law Center 
          Children Now 
          Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking (CAST) 
          International Justice Mission 
          Equality California 
          Junior League of Long Beach
          Junior League of Los Angeles
          Junior League of Monterey, Inc. 
          Junior League of Napa-Sonoma 
          Junior League of Riverside, Inc. 
          Junior League of San Diego 
          ---------------------------
          <5> Mendel, R. (2011). No Place for Kids: The Case for Reducing  
          Juvenile Incarceration. The Annie E. Casey Foundation.  
          Baltimore, MD. Available online:  
           http://www.aecf.org/OurWork/JuvenileJustice/JuvenileJusticeReport 
          .aspx  
          <6> Ending the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children: A  
          Call for Multi-System Collaboration in California, Child Welfare  
          Council, pg 11.
          <7>Early Intervention into the Sex Trading and Trafficking of  
          Minnesota's Female Youth, A Benefit-Cost Analysis, Minnesota  
          Indian Resource Center, 2012  p. vi.








                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page M
          Junior League of San Francisco, Inc. 
          Junior League of San Jose 
          Junior League of Oakland-East Bay
          National Council of Jewish Women-California 
          Red Window Project 
          West Coast Children's Clinic

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Chris Reefe / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089