BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2043
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 18, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 2043 (Bigelow) - As Amended:  May 19, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              Water, Parks and  
          Wildlife     Vote:                            11-0

          Urgency:     Yes                  State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill repeals the $11.4 billion General Obligation (GO)  
          water bond scheduled to appear on the November 2014 ballot and  
          replaces it with an $8.035 GO water bond. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Annual GF principal and interest payments of approximately  
            $522 million.

            The state pays principal and interest during the repayment  
            period.  Cost will depend on factors such as the actual  
            interest rate paid, the timing of the bond sales (bonds are  
            often sold over a number of years), and the time period over  
            which the bonds are repaid. 

            Assuming a 5% flat interest rate with a 30-year repayment  
            period, the state would pay about $65 million annually in  
            principal and interest costs for each $1 billion borrowed. 

          2)One-time GF costs to the Secretary of State of about $200,000  
            for preparation of a statewide ballot pamphlet.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose.   This bill reduces and updates the provisions in the  
            water bond scheduled for the November 2014 ballot to better  
            meet the current needs of the state.  Specifically, this bond  
            provides the following funding by chapter:

            CHAPTER 5. Drought Relief, $495 million:








                                                                  AB 2043
                                                                  Page  2


             a)   $75 million for small community wastewater projects
             b)   $200 million for drought relief projects
             c)   $120 million for safe drinking water projects
             d)   $100 million for local water supply projects
                
             CHAPTER 6. Water Supply Reliability, $1.19 billion:

            a)   $840 million for specific geographic regions
            b)   $350 million for regional water supply and conveyance

            CHAPTER 7. Delta Sustainability, $1.5 billion

            CHAPTER 8. Statewide Water System Improvements (Water  
            Storage), $3 billion 
                
             CHAPTER 9. Groundwater Protection and Water Quality, $800  
            million
           
             CHAPTER 10. Water Recycling Conservation and Efficiency, $1.05  
            billion.

           1)Background.   In 2009, the Legislature convened an  
            extraordinary session to address numerous water, supply,  
            reliability, and environmental restoration issues.  Issues  
            included addressing water conveyance, storage, conservation  
            and groundwater.  Subsequently, five-bill package of water  
            legislation was passed and signed, including SB 2 (Cogdill),  
            Chapter 3, Statutes of the 2009-10 Seventh Extraordinary  
            Session (SB 2 X7).

            SB 2 X7 placed an $11.14 billion water bond on the November  
            2010 ballot.  However, in 2010, supporters of the water bond  
            decided a sluggish economy, coupled with the state's need to  
            focus on its dire budget shortfall, meant that delaying the  
            bond vote could increase its chances of success.   
            Subsequently, AB 1265 (Caballero, 2010) was signed into law  
            and moved the water bond to the 2012 general election.  AB  
            1265 both changed the timing of the water bond vote and  
            deleted a provision allowing for-profit entities to be members  
            of joint powers authorities for bond-funded surface water  
            storage projects.  
             
             In 2012, polling suggested an incomplete economic recovery  
            meant the water bond was still unlikely to pass.  In response,  








                                                                  AB 2043
                                                                  Page  3

            AB 1422 (Perea, 2012) moved the water bond to the November 4,  
            2014 statewide general election but otherwise left the text  
            unchanged. 

           2)Other Water Bond Proposals.   Numerous replacement water bonds  
            have been considered during this legislative session including  
            the following:

             a)   AB 1331 (Rendon), as amended May 8, 2014, repeals the  
               existing bond and places an $8 billion bond on the November  
               2014 ballot.  AB 1331 is currently pending in the Senate  
               Governance and Finance Committee.

             b)   AB 2686 (Perea), as amended May 1, 2014, repeals the  
               existing bond and places a $10.25 billion bond on the  
               November 2014 ballot.  AB 2686 is before this committee  
               today.

             c)   SB 848 (Wolk), as amended  June 10, 2014, repeals the  
               existing bond and places a $10.5 billion bond on the  
               November 2014 ballot.  SB 848 is pending on the Senate  
               Floor.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081