BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2049
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 9, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                   AB 2049 (Dahle) - Introduced:  February 20, 2014

          Policy Committee:                              Environmental  
          Safety and Toxic Materials                    Vote: 6-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:   
          No     Reimbursable:              


           SUMMARY  

          This bill expands the authorization that allows small public  
          water systems to use point-of-use and point-of-entry treatment  
          in lieu of centralized treatment.  Specifically, this bill  
          increases the number of service connections from 200 to 500 for  
          eligible small systems.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Minor, if any state costs.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   According to the State Water Resources Control  
            Board (SWRCB), between the years of 2002 and 2010, over 600  
            systems serving 21 million residents relied on contaminated  
            groundwater.  Some community water systems cannot afford  
            treatment and lack drinking water infrastructure and  
            alternative drinking water sources.  According to the author,  
            this bill increases the number of small water systems that can  
            take advantage of cost effective interim treatment options.

           2)Background.   Point-of-use treatment consists of a small device  
            that treats water, at or near its use within a building.  
            Point-of-entry treatment typically consists of a larger device  
            that treats water, as it enters a building. The federal Safe  
            Drinking Water Act allows systems to install POU and POE  
            treatment devices to achieve compliance with the National  
            Primary Drinking Water Regulations.   









                                                                  AB 2049
                                                                  Page  2

            Current state law directs DPH to adopt regulations governing  
            the use of POU and POE treatment by public water systems in  
            lieu of centralized treatment where it can be demonstrated  
            that centralized treatment is not immediately economically  
            feasible. Use of such systems is to be limited to the  
            following:

             a)   Water systems with less than 200 service connections.  

              b)   Usage allowed under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act  
               and its implementing regulations and guidance.  
                
             c)   Water systems that have submitted preapplications to DPH  
               for funding to correct the violations for which the  
               point-of-use treatment is provided.  
             
            DPH has adopted emergency regulations, and is in the process  
            of adopting permanent regulations, consistent with the above  
            criteria, as well as limiting use of point-of-use treatment to  
            three years or until funding for centralized treatment is  
            available, whichever is sooner.  To demonstrate that a  
            centralized system is not immediately economically feasible, a  
            community must report its median household income to DPH,  
            among other data.

            DPH reports it currently certifies POU and POE water treatment  
            systems as part of its Water Treatment Device Certification  
            program.

           3)Prior Legislation.   SB 962 (Anderson) of 2012 contained the  
            same provision of this bill and was held on this committee's  
            Suspense File.  SB 962 also contained audit requirements and  
            certification provision not in this bill.  
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081