BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �





                                                                  AB 2058

                                                                  Page  1


          GOVERNOR'S VETO
          AB 2058 (Wilk)
          As Amended  June 19, 2014
          2/3 vote

           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |77-0 |(May 27, 2014)  |SENATE: |33-0 |(August 13,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0 |(August 20,     |        |     |               |
          |           |     |2014)           |        |     |               |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Modifies the definition of "state body" to clarify  
          that standing committees, even if composed of less than three  
          members, are a "state body" for the purposes of the Bagley-Keene  
          Open Meeting Act (Act).  Specifically,  this bill  clarifies that  
          advisory bodies created to consist of fewer than three  
          individuals are not a state body, except that standing  
          committees of a state body, irrespective of their composition,  
          which have a continuing subject matter jurisdiction, or a  
          meeting schedule fixed by resolution, policies, bylaws, or  
          formal action of a state body are state bodies for the purposes  
          of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, in general, this bill imposes minor to moderate costs  
          on affected state entities.  Some state entities may simply  
          decide to eliminate certain advisory bodies and specified  
          standing committees rather than spend limited resources for  
          compliance with open meeting requirements.  

           COMMENTS  :   

          Purpose of the bill:  According to the author, current law  
          contains two parallel open meeting statutes; the Brown Act for  
          local governments and the Bagley-Keene Act for state government.  
           Prior to 1993, the Brown Act contained language very similar to  
          the current language in the Bagley-Keene Act regarding standing  










                                                                  AB 2058

                                                                  Page  2


          committees.  However, in the 1990's when a local government  
          entity attempted to claim a loophole existed for two-member  
          standing committees, the legislature promptly removed any  
          ambiguity on the matter of the Brown Act.  However, a conforming  
          change was not made, to the Bagley-Keene Act, as no change was  
          thought necessary.

          The ambiguity left in the Bagley-Keene Act is allowing state  
          bodies to deliberate and direct staff behind closed doors.   
          These state agencies are allowing standing committees to  
          interpret the language of the Bagley-Keene Act in a manner that  
          is contrary to the intent of the Legislature and the public;  
          government at all levels must conduct its business visibly and  
          transparently.

          This bill would align the definitions in the Bagley-Keene Act to  
          those in the Brown Act, making the clarifying change in the  
          Bagley-Keene Act that the Legislature made to the Brown Act in  
          1993.  In addition, the bill would make it definite that all  
          standing committees are subject to the transparency of open  
          meeting regulations, regardless of the size of the membership. 

          Similar language in the Brown Act: As discussed above, the Brown  
          Act currently contains language that is very similar to the  
          language found in this bill.  The Brown Act defines a  
          "legislative body" as a:
               
               A commission, committee, board, or other body of a  
               local agency, whether permanent or temporary,  
               decision-making or advisory, created by charter,  
               ordinance, resolution, or formal action of a  
               legislative body.  However, advisory committee,  
               composed solely of the members of the legislative body  
               that are less than a quorum of the legislative bodies,  
               except that standing committees of a legislative body,  
               irrespective of their composition, which have a  
               continuing subject matter jurisdiction, or a meeting  
               schedule fixed by charter, ordinance, resolution, or  
               formal action of a legislative boy are legislative  
               bodies for purposes of this chapter. (Government Code  
               Section 54952(b))










                                                                  AB 2058

                                                                  Page  3



          As the above language shows, local governments are currently  
          abiding by regulations that this bill is currently trying to  
          apply to state bodies.  This bill would, in simple terms, simply  
          align the definitions of a "state body" in the Bagley-Keene Act  
          to the definitions of a "legislative body" in the Brown Act.
           
          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE  :

          "This bill expands the definition of a state body, under the  
          Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, to standing advisory committees  
          with one or two members. 

          "Any meeting involving formal action by a state body should be  
          open to the public.  An advisory committee, however, does not  
          have authority to act on its own and must present any findings  
          and recommendations to a larger body in a public setting for  
          formal action. That should be sufficient."


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Felipe Lopez / G.O. / (916) 319-2531 


                                                                FN: 0005636