BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






          SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT   BILL NO:  AB 2126
          Norma Torres, Chair          HEARING DATE:  June 23, 2014
          AB 2126 (Bonta)    as amended   5/23/14      FISCAL:  YES

           MYERS-MILIAS-BROWN ACT:  MEDIATION AND FACTFINDING
           
           HISTORY  :

            Sponsor:  American Federation of State, County and  
            Municipal Employees (AFSCME)
                   California Professional Firefighters (CPF),  
            Co-Sponsors
                   Service Employees International Union (SEIU),  
            Co-Sponsors

          Other legislation:SB 979 (Beale) 2014
                          Currently in Senate PE&R Committee
                         AB 616 (Bocanegra) 2013
                                         Held in Senate Appropriations  
                          Committee
                         AB 778 (Bocanegra) 2013
                          Died in Assembly Appropriation Committee
                         AB 537 (Bonta),
                          Chapter 785, Statutes of 213
                         AB 1606 (Perea),
                          Chapter 314, Statutes of 2012
                         AB 646 (Atkins),
                          Chapter 680, Statutes of 2011

           ASSEMBLY VOTES  :

            PER & SS                 5-1       4/02/14
            Appropriations           12-5      5/23/14
            Assembly Floor           54-22     5/29/14
           
          SUMMARY  : 
          
          1)allows either party in collective bargaining between a  
            public agency and its recognized employee organization to  
            request mediation after providing the other party with a  
            written declaration of impasse and requires the parties to  
            agree on a mediator within 5 days of a request for  
            mediation.  If the parties fail to agree upon the selection  
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          1









            of a mediator within 5 days, the bill requires PERB to  
            appoint a mediator no later than 5 days after the receipt  
            of either party's request for a mediator.  The bill also  
            exempts from the requirement for mediation, as specified,  
            those public agencies that have a binding arbitration  
            process.

          2)provides, with respect to factfinding procedures, that the  
            employee organization's request for factfinding is not  
            limited to impasse negotiation over an MOU or a successor  
            MOU, and may include differences that arise from any  
            dispute over any matter within the scope of representation.  
             The bill also provides more flexibility to factfinders in  
            weighing the criteria for making their findings and  
            recommendations and allows an employee organization to  
            voluntarily waive, in writing, its procedural right to  
            request a factfinding panel.

          3)declares that the provisions respecting factfinding  
            procedures are clarifying amendments declarative of  
            existing law.

           BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS  :
          
           1)Existing law  :

             a)   establishes the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA), which  
               provides a statutory framework for local government  
               employer-employee relations by providing a reasonable  
               method of resolving disputes regarding wages, hours, and  
               other terms and conditions of employment between local  
               public employers and public employee organizations.

             b)   under MMBA, authorizes local public agencies to adopt  
               reasonable rules and regulations after consultation in  
               good faith with representatives of an employee  
               organization or organizations.

             c)   provides that if, after a reasonable amount of time,  
               representatives of the public agency and the employee  
               organization fail to reach agreement, the two parties  
               may  mutually  agree on the appointment of a mediator and  
               equally share the cost.
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          2










             d)   creates a statutory framework and process for  
               factfinding, defining the duties and rights of the  
               parties.

             e)   allows an employer to implement its last, best, and  
               final offer  after  any applicable mediation and  
               factfinding procedures have been exhausted.  A  
               recognized employee organization retains the right to  
               meet and confer each year with the employer despite the  
               implementation of the last, best and final offer.

             f)   requires factfinders, in arriving at their findings  
               and recommendations, to consider weigh, and be guided by  
                all  of the following criteria:

            i)     State and federal laws that are applicable to the  
                 employer.
            ii)    Local rules, regulations, or ordinances.
            iii)   Stipulations of the parties.
            iv)    The interests and welfare of the public and the  
                 financial ability of the public agency.
            v)     Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of  
                 employment of the employees involved in the  
                 factfinding proceeding with the wages, hours, and  
                 conditions of employment of other employees performing  
                 similar services in comparable public agencies.
            vi)    The consumer price index for goods and services,  
                 commonly known as the cost of living.
            vii)   The overall compensation presently received by the  
                 employees, including direct wage compensation,  
                 vacations, holidays, and other excused time, insurance  
                 and pensions, medical and hospitalization benefits,  
                 the continuity and stability of employment, and all  
                 other benefits received.
            viii)   Any other facts not confined to those specified in  
                 paragraphs (1) to (7), inclusive, which are normally  
                 or traditionally taken into consideration in making  
                 the findings and recommendations.

             g)   provides that the procedural right of an employee  
               organization to request a factfinding panel cannot be  
               expressly or voluntarily waived.
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          3










           1)This bill  :  makes changes to the Meyers-Milas-Brown Act  
            (MMBA) with respect to mediation, impasse procedures, and  
            factfinding.  Specifically, this bill does the following:

              a)   Mediation  (GC) 3505.2 (a)

               AB 2126 changes the mediation process in the MMBA from  
               one requiring mutual consent to enter mediation to one  
               where either party can require the parties enter  
               mediation by providing the other party with a written  
               declaration of impasse and requesting mediation.   
               Thereafter, the parties have 5 days to agree on a  
               mediator.  If they fail to agree, either party can  
               request PERB to appoint a mediator which PERB must do  
               within 5 days of receiving the request.

              b)   Exception for Public Agencies with Binding  
               Arbitration  GC 3505.2 (b)

               The bill exempts from the requirement for mediation  
               those public agencies that have a procedure that applies  
               if an impasse has been reached between the public agency  
               and a bargaining unit and the procedure includes, at a  
               minimum, a process for binding arbitration.

              c)   Factfinding Not Limited to Issues from Bargaining  
               Impasse  GC 3505.4 (a)(2)

               The bill clarifies that differences between the parties  
               that are subject to a request by the employee  
               organization for submission to a factfinding panel may  
               include differences that arise from  any  dispute over any  
               matter within the scope of representation as to which an  
               obligation to meet and confer exists and are not limited  
               to negotiations after impasse after collective  
               bargaining for a new or successor memorandum of  
               understanding.

              d)   Flexibility for Factfinder Deliberations  GC 3505.4  
               (d)

               The bill gives factfinder panel members greater  
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          4









               flexibility in arriving at their findings and  
               recommendations by providing that they need only  
               consider, weigh, and be guided by the criteria, as  
               specified, that the factfinders deem to be relevant to  
               the dispute.

              e)   Waiver of Procedural Right to Request Factfinding  GC  
               3505.4 (e)

               AB 2126 specifically provides that an employee  
               organization may voluntarily waive in writing the right  
               to request a factfinding panel.  The provision reverses  
               current law's prohibition against the waiver.

              f)   Factfinding Provisions Are Declaration of Existing  
               Law  

               The bill finds and declares that the amendments made by  
               this act to provisions applicable to factfinding  
               procedures are clarifying and declaratory of existing  
               law.

           FISCAL  :

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:

            Based on PERB estimates of staffing necessary to administer  
            the provisions of this bill, the fiscal impact of  
            administration is approximately $800,000 General Fund (GF).

            Though the bill is not keyed a local mandate, there could  
            be substantial state mandated reimbursement of local costs.  
             The amount would depend on the number of requests for  
            mediation.  Reimbursable costs could be in the millions of  
            dollars.  PERB staff raised the possibility of exceeding  
            100 additional mediation cases annually.  The Commission on  
            State Mandates has approved a test claim for any local  
            government subject to the jurisdiction of PERB that incurs  
            increased costs as a result of a mandate, meaning their  
            costs are eligible for reimbursement.

           COMMENTS  :

          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          5









           1)Arguments in Support  :  
           
          According to the author, 

            There is a need to conform the MMBA to the other employee  
            relations Acts in a manner that enables both employers and  
            employee organizations to be extended access to the  
            assistance and expertise of a mediator when either party  
            recognizes that their dispute could benefit from such  
            assistance and expertise.

          According to the California Professional Firefighters,

            Without conforming the mediation provisions of MMBA to the  
            mediation provisions of EERA, the Dills Act and HEERA,  
            obstructionist parties governed by MMBA will continue to  
            employ tactics to reject compromise or rush to impasse,  
            thereby blocking the other party's attempt to request  
            mediation in an effort to resolve their differences.  
            Further, conforming the law in the manner proposed by AB  
            2126 will ensure that all parties remain at the bargaining  
            table while receiving valuable mediation assistance up to  
            the point where either an agreement is reached or one of  
            the parties declares an impasse.

          According to AFSCME,

            By allowing either negotiating party to request mediation,  
            this bill will reduce the likelihood of a deadlock and  
            allow local government employees to continue working under  
            a fairly negotiated agreement.


           2)Arguments in Opposition  :  
           
            According to the League of California Cities,

               Under AB 2126, factfinders would only have to be guided  
               by criteria "that the factfinders deem relevant to the  
               dispute."  In other words, with a 2-1 vote, the  
               factfinders could focus only on comparing wages, hours,  
               and conditions with other agencies, and not -for  
               instance - deem relevant the local agency's financial  
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          6









               condition.

               The net effect of this measure is to erode incentives  
               for employee organizations to work with public employers  
               to reach agreement in good-faith collective bargaining.   
               PERB nominated mediators and factfinders will be  
               inclined to be sympathetic with employee perspectives  
               and have no responsibility for the financial health and  
               stewardship of the affected local agency.

           3)SUPPORT  :

            American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
            Employees (AFSCME), Sponsor
            California Professional Firefighters (CPF), Co-Sponsors
            Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Co-Sponsors
            Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
            California Association of Professional Employees (CAPE)
            California School Employees Association (CSEA), AFL-CIO
            California Federation of Teachers (CFT)
            California Fraternal Order of Police
            California Professional Firefighters (CPF)
            California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
            Glendale City Employees Association
            Long Beach Police Officers Association
            Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association
            Los Angeles Police Protective League
            Los Angeles Probation Officers' Union, AFSCME, Local 685
            Organization of SMUD Employees
            Riverside Sheriffs' Association
            Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs Association
            San Bernardino Public Employees Association
            San Luis Obispo County Employees Association
            Santa Ana Police Officers Association
            Santa Rosa City Employees Association

           4)OPPOSITION  :

            Association of California Cities - Orange County (ACC-OC)
            Association of California Healthcare Districts (ACHD)
            Butte County Board of Supervisors
            California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA)
            California Special Districts Association (CSDA)
          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          7









            California State Association of Counties (CSAC)
            City and County of San Francisco
            City of Palo Alto
            City of Redwood City
            City of Salinas
            Contra Costa County
            County of San Bernardino
            Fresno County Board of Supervisors
            Kings County Board of Supervisors
            League of California Cities
            Napa County Board of Supervisors
            Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC)
            San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors
            San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors
            Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
            Urban Counties Caucus (UCC)




                                      #####
          



















          Glenn A. Miles
          Date:  June 13, 2014                                    Page  
          8