BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE BILL NO: AB 2173
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN AUTHOR: BRADFORD
VERSION: 4/30/14
Analysis by: Nathan Phillips FISCAL: NO
Hearing date: June 10, 2014
SUBJECT:
Motorized bicycles
DESCRIPTION:
This bill increases the maximum horsepower allowed under state
law for electric scooters and mopeds from two to four.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law defines a "motorized bicycle" or "moped" as any
two-wheeled or three-wheeled device having fully operative
pedals for propulsion by human power, or having no pedals if
powered solely by electrical energy, and an automatic
transmission and a motor which produces less than two gross
brake horsepower, and is capable of propelling the device at a
maximum speed of not more than 30 miles per hour on level
ground.
Existing law prohibits motorized bicycles from being used on
bikeways, unless they are within or adjacent to roadways.
This bill redefines a motorized bicycle or moped under state law
to increase the maximum gross brake horsepower that its motor
produces to less than four.
COMMENTS:
1.Purpose . According to the sponsor, Scoot Networks, Inc.,
users of its two-horsepower rental electric scooters have
difficulty maintaining safe speeds on hills, and have
difficulty accelerating to keep pace with accelerating
automobile traffic. The sponsor asserts that increasing
horsepower from two to four would increase safety by allowing
operators to maintain speed on hills and accelerate more
quickly when needed in traffic.
2.Horsepower . Gross brake horsepower is "raw" engine
AB 2173 (BRADFORD) Page 2
horsepower, not including losses from elements like the
drivetrain or ancillary equipment. The net power of a
motorized bicycle, exerted by tire onto pavement, will be
somewhat less than the gross brake horsepower. Two
horsepower, the limit for electric scooters and mopeds under
current law, equals about 1,500 watts, and four horsepower
equals about 3,000 watts. Another commonly used unit of power
is the cubic centimeter (cc). Four horsepower equals 60 to 70
cc, which is about the power of the smallest motorcycles or
pocket bikes. To appreciate the significance of these values,
by comparison, low-speed electric bicycles have motors that
range from 350 watts to 750 watts. Thus, doubling the power
of the electric scooters considered here to nearly 3,000 watts
would make them four to eight times as powerful as typical
low-speed electric bikes. Because electric scooters and
mopeds are designed to be primarily used on roadways and
shared with motor vehicles, a need for motor power
substantially greater than that of low-speed electric bicycles
seems reasonable.
3.Electric scooters and mopeds in bike lanes . Existing law
allows any motorized bicycle to use bikeways that are within
or adjacent to a roadway. This bill would allow more powerful
motorized bicycles to operate on bike lanes on roadways, and
bike paths adjacent to roadways. Safety for all bikeway users
would be reduced if these more powerful motorized bicycles
enabled operators to take more chances, or to be more
aggressive, in passing or "tailgating" conventional bicycle
operators.
4.Will this promote louder and more polluting motorized
bicycles ? A potential unintended consequence of this bill is
promotion of more powerful, louder, and more polluting
internal combustion-powered motorized bicycles, or mopeds.
This is unlikely to happen. Gasoline-powered scooters like
Vespa, which continue to be popular, do not qualify as
motorized bicycles because they lack pedals, and thus would
not be affected by this bill. The market for mopeds, which do
have pedals, appears to be dying, overtaken by electric
scooters and low-speed electric bikes on the one hand, and
gasoline-powered scooters on the other hand. New and more
powerful internal combustion engine kits that attach to
conventional bicycles could, in principal, result from passage
of this bill, but they would need to comply with California
Air Resources Board regulations that limit air emissions.
AB 2173 (BRADFORD) Page 3
Assembly Votes:
Floor: 78-0
Trans: 15-0
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on
Wednesday, June 4,
2014.)
SUPPORT: Scoot Networks, Inc. (sponsor)
OPPOSED: None received.