AB 2178,
as amended, Levine. Pupil instruction:begin delete blending learning programs.end deletebegin insert Blended Learning Pilot Program.end insert
Existing
end deletebegin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertExistingend insert law establishes an adopted course of study for pupils in grades 1 to 6, inclusive, and in grades 7 to 12, inclusive.
This bill wouldbegin delete express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would encourage greater innovation and expansion of blended learning models by removing barriers to innovation and accommodating new structures of operations that recognize the unique circumstances and challenges of effective blended learning programs. The bill also would make various findings and declarationsend deletebegin insert
establish, commencing with the 2015-16 school year and continuing through the 2017-18 school year, the Blended Learning Pilot Program to be administered by the State Board of Education for the purpose of exploring various models of innovation and documenting best and promising practices in the emerging educational delivery model known as blended learning, as specifiedend insert.
(2) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district or a county office of education, on a districtwide or countywide basis or on behalf of one or more of its schools or programs, after a public hearing on the matter, to request the state board to waive all or part of any section of the Education Code or any regulation of the state board that implements a provision of the Education Code that may be waived, except as specified.
end insertbegin insertThis bill additionally would authorize a charter school to request the state board to waive all or part of any section of the Education Code or any regulation of the state board that implements a provision of the Education Code that may be waived, except as specified.
end insertVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin delete(a)end deletebegin delete end deleteThe Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(1)
end delete
4begin insert(a)end insert Significant educational innovations are occurring throughout
5the state in the emerging area of blended learning.
6(2)
end delete
7begin insert(b)end insert School districts, county offices of education, and charter
8schools are offering a blended approach that integrates more
9effective in-person instructional strategies with access to
10technology-enabled learning opportunities inside and outside of
11traditional classrooms.
12(3)
end delete
13begin insert(c)end insert Early results are showing that a blended learning
14environment can improve pupil achievement, particularly for those
15pupils with the greatest needs.
16(4)
end delete
17begin insert(d)end insert These programs, however, are not well-supported by the
18existing statutory and regulatory structure that was designed for
19programs to operate either as fully traditional seat-time or fully
20independent study.
21(5)
end delete
22begin insert(e)end insert Constraints placed on blended learning programs limit their
23ability to further innovate and better serve the highest-need pupils.
24(6)
end delete
25begin insert(f)end insert Changes are needed to ensure both school districts and charter
26schools may expand innovation of blended learning models.
P3 1(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that
2would encourage greater innovation and expansion of blended
3learning models by removing barriers to innovation and
4accommodating new structures of operations that recognize the
5unique circumstances and challenges of
effective blended learning
6programs.
begin insertSection 33052.5 of the end insertbegin insertEducation Codeend insertbegin insert is amended to
8read:end insert
For purposes of this article, “school district” shall
10include county offices of educationbegin insert and charter schoolsend insert.
begin insertChapter 8.7 (commencing with Section 52280) is added
12to Part 28 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the end insertbegin insertEducation Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
13
For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have
17the following meanings:
18(a) “Blended learning” means a formal education program in
19which a pupil learns at least in part through online delivery of
20content and instruction with some element of pupil control over
21time, place, and pace and at least in part at a supervised location
22away from home.
23(b) “Pilot program” means the Blended Learning Pilot Program
24established pursuant to this chapter.
(a) The Blended Learning Pilot Program is hereby
26established and shall be administered by the state board to explore
27various models of innovation and document best and promising
28practices in the emerging educational delivery model known as
29blended learning.
30(b) Commencing with the 2015-16 school year, the pilot
31program shall operate for three school years. The state board shall
32establish an application process and timeline to ensure pilot
33program participants are selected and applicable waivers are
34approved before the commencement of the 2015-16 school year.
35(c) The state board may solicit and receive grants from private
36not-for-profit foundations and organizations for
purposes of
37funding the administration of the pilot program.
(a) A school district, county office of education, charter
39school, or charter school management organization may apply to
40the state board to participate in the pilot program. A single
P4 1applicant may include more than one school if each school in a
2single application shares a common educational model and
3administrative structure.
4(b) Each application shall be submitted to the state board in
5writing and, at a minimum, shall include all of the following:
6(1) A written proposal describing the blended learning program
7offered by the applicant and the specific pupil population served
8by the applicant.
9(2) Evidence of
the applicant’s track record of success in
10operating a blended learning program.
11(3) Evidence of the applicant’s track record of success in serving
12the target pupil population, and particularly in closing the
13achievement gap for high-need pupils, including English learners,
14pupils living in poverty, foster youth, and other pupil subgroups
15identified as underperforming.
16(4) The applicant’s plan for documenting and reporting to the
17state board on its promising practices and pupil outcomes during
18the term of the pilot program, including specific educational goals
19and outcomes that align with the applicant’s local control and
20accountability plan, adopted pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing
21with Section 52060) of Chapter 6.1.
22(5) A description of any partnerships the applicant has
23developed with individuals and
organizations outside of the
24applicant organization, including, but not limited to, blended
25learning policy and research entities, academic institutions,
26educational technology experts, community organizations, and
27local employers.
28(6) Evidence of support for the application by individuals and
29organizations outside of the applicant organization, including, but
30not limited to, blended learning policy and research entities,
31academic institutions, educational technology experts, community
32organizations, and local employers.
33(7) The name and address of each school included in the
34application.
35(8) A description of specific statutes for which the applicant
36requests a waiver in accordance with Section 52284 and Article
373 (commencing with Section 33050) of Chapter 1 of Part 20 of
38Division 2, if any. The waiver request shall
include a description
39of the educational benefit to be achieved as a result of the waiver
40and any alternative conditions, procedures, or requirements that
P5 1may be applied as an alternative to the statutes proposed to be
2waived.
The state board shall select up to 20 applicants to
4participate in the pilot program. In evaluating and selecting pilot
5program participants, the state board shall consider all of the
6application criteria listed in Section 52282 and all of the following:
7(a) The overall viability of the applicant’s blended learning
8model and the applicant’s likelihood to successfully achieve desired
9outcomes for the pupils enrolled in the pilot program.
10(b) The degree to which the applicant can demonstrate early
11success with employing innovation in the field of blended learning.
12(c) The degree of rigor and reasonableness of the goals and
13outcomes the
applicant has defined for the pilot program.
14(d) The degree to which the total selected participant pool
15reflects a range of blended learning models and structures of
16service delivery.
(a) The state board may amend a waiver request
18submitted by an applicant pursuant to Section 52282, consider
19alternative waivers, or impose additional terms on an applicant
20as a condition of a waiver receipt at the state board’s discretion.
21Nothing in this chapter shall require the state board to approve a
22waiver requested by an applicant.
23(b) An applicant for the pilot program shall be deemed a school
24district for the purposes of requesting and receiving waivers
25authorized pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 33050)
26of Chapter 1 of Part 20 of Division 2. Applicants for the pilot
27program may request, and the state board may approve, waivers
28subject to any alternative oversight or conditions determined by
29the state board. An
approved waiver shall further the intent of the
30pilot program to offer greater flexibility to further innovation and
31pupil achievement in blended learning programs and may include,
32but not be limited to, waivers that achieve any of the following:
33(1) Recognize and offer flexibility on existing operational
34barriers that constrain innovation in blended learning programs.
35(2) Allow alternative class structures and instructional delivery
36models.
37(3) Support structures that promote individualized instruction
38in a blended learning online and schoolsite environment.
39(c) A charter school participating in the pilot program shall be
40exempt from the funding determination process and
P6 1classroom-based instruction criteria established in subdivisions
2(d) and (e) of
Section 47612.5, Section 47634.2, and any
3implementing regulations.
4(d) A charter school participating in the pilot program shall
5notify its authorizing entity of its participation in the pilot program
6and shall provide the authorizing entity a copy of any waiver that
7is approved as a result of participation. Participation in the pilot
8program and approval of an associated waiver shall not be
9considered a material revision to the school’s charter.
The state board may terminate the participation of a
11participant in the pilot program, and any associated waivers, for
12good cause, as determined by the state board at a public meeting
13at any time.
(a) At the end of each school year, a school
15participating in the pilot program shall submit a report to the state
16board on its progress and outcomes in accordance with format
17and content requirements and timeline as determined by the state
18board.
19(b) (1) No later than December 31, 2018, the state board shall
20submit a report to the Legislature on the results of the pilot
21program, including recommendations on whether to continue any
22of the waivers for the schools that participated in the pilot program
23and whether any other changes in the law are supported as a result
24of the outcomes achieved in the participating schools.
25(2) A report submitted pursuant to
paragraph (1) shall be
26submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
27Code.
This chapter shall remain in effect only until January
291, 2019, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted
30statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2019, deletes or extends
31that date.
O
98