BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2193
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2193 (Gordon)
          As Amended  August 22, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |77-0 |(May 28, 2014)  |SENATE: |35-0 |(August 27,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    W., P. & W.

          SUMMARY  :  Enacts the Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Act  
          which would require the director of the Department of Fish and  
          Wildlife (DFW) to approve small habitat restoration and  
          enhancement projects that meet specified criteria.  

           The Senate amendments  :

          1)Strike a legislative finding regarding small scale restoration  
            projects to benefit listed species.

          2)Modify the definition of an eligible "habitat restoration or  
            enhancement project" under this bill to mean a project with  
            the primary purpose of improving fish and wildlife habitat,  
            and that, at the time the project proponent submits a written  
            request for approval, meets the eligibility requirements for  
            the State Water Resources Control Board's Order for Clean  
            Water Act Section 401 General Water Quality Certification for  
            Small Habitat Restoration Projects (Water Board's Section 401  
            Certification Order), or its current equivalent.  Specify that  
            the order or current equivalent may include programmatic  
            waivers or waste discharge requirements for small habitat  
            restoration projects.

          3)Modify the information that is required to be included in a  
            written request to the director for approval of a project.   
            Establish a different procedure for projects that have not yet  
            received certification pursuant to the Water Board's Section  
            401 Certification Order, and for projects that have received  
            that certification or its current equivalent.  

          4)For projects that have not yet received certification pursuant  
            to the State Water Board's Section 401 Certification Order,  
            specify the following process:








                                                                  AB 2193
                                                                  Page  2


             a)   Require the written request for approval to include:  a  
               full description of the project, as specified; as  
               assessment of the project area including pre-project  
               photographs; a geographic description of the project site  
               including maps and other specified information; a  
               description of the environmental protection measures  
               incorporated into the project design so that no potentially  
               significant adverse effects on the environment are likely  
               to occur; substantial evidence to support a conclusion the  
               project meets the requirements; and a certifying statement  
               that the project will comply with the California  
               Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by conforming to the  
               requirements of the California Code of Regulations Section  
               15333 of Title 14.  

             b)   Specify that environmental protection measures  
               incorporated into the project may include but are not  
               limited to, appropriate seasonal work limitations, measures  
               to avoid and minimize impacts to water quality and  
               potentially present species protected by state and federal  
               law, and the use of qualified professionals for standard  
               preconstruction surveys where protected species are  
               potentially present.

             c)   Require the director of DFW to approve a habitat  
               restoration or enhancement project within 60 days of  
               receiving a written request for approval if the director  
               determines the written request includes all required  
               information, as specified, and meets specified  
               requirements.

             d)   Add a requirement that the project is not part of a  
               regulatory permit for nonhabitat restoration or enhancement  
               construction activity, a regulatory settlement, a  
               regulatory enforcement action, or a court order.  Require  
               that a project meet the eligibility requirements for the  
               State Water Board's Section 401 Certification Order, but  
               has not yet received certification pursuant to that order.

             e)   Require the director to deny the written request for  
               project approval if the director determines that the  
               written request does not contain all of the information  
               required, or fails to meet the requirements specified, and  
               to inform the project proponent of the reasons for the  








                                                                  AB 2193
                                                                  Page  3

               denial.

             f)   Require the project proponent to submit a notice of  
               completion to DFW no later than 30 days after project  
               completion, as specified.  Require the project proponent to  
               submit a monitoring report as described and provide that  
               the project proponent may comply with this requirement by  
               submitting other specified monitoring reports required by  
               the State Water Resources Control Board, regional water  
               quality control boards, or for DFW or federal voluntary  
               habitat restoration programs, including the Fisheries  
               Restoration Grant program. 

          5)For projects that have received certification pursuant to the  
            State Water Board's Section 401 Certification Order, specify  
            the following process:

             a)   Require the written request for approval to include the  
               following: 

               i)     Specified information regarding the notice of  
                 applicability indicating the project has received the  
                 Water Board's Section 401 Certification Order  
                 certification and the project proponent's notice of  
                 intent.

               ii)    A description of species protection measures  
                 incorporated into the project design that are not already  
                 included in the notice of intent.   

               iii)   Required fees.

             b)   Require the director of DFW to have receipt of the  
               written request published in the California Regulatory  
               Notice Register immediately upon receipt, to approve the  
               project within 30 days of receipt if the director  
               determines the project meets all of the requirements as  
               specified, and to immediately publish the determination in  
               the Register.  Provide that if the director determines that  
               the written request is not complete, the project may be  
               authorized under the procedure for projects not yet  
               certified under the State Water Board's Section 401  
               Certification Order.

             c)   Require the project proponent to submit the monitoring  








                                                                  AB 2193
                                                                  Page  4

               plan, monitoring report, and notice of completion required  
               by the State Water Resources Control Board to the DFW.

          6)Provide that the DFW and other state agencies exercising  
            authority under this bill shall not be liable with regard to  
            any determination or authorization made pursuant to this bill.

          7)Provide that the application fee DFW is authorized to assess  
            under this bill shall be consistent with the fees assessed for  
            streambed alteration agreements and shall not exceed the  
            reasonable administrative and implementation costs of DFW  
            related to the project.

          8)Require the DFW to submit a report to the Legislature by  
            December 31, 2020, on the number, type, and geographical  
            distribution of approved projects, funding adequacy, and  
            recommendations for changes and improvements to the program  
            established by this bill.

          9)Add a sunset clause providing that this bill shall remain in  
            effect only until January 1, 2022, and as of that date is  
            repealed unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before  
            January 1, 2022 deletes or extends that date.

          10)Make other clarifying and technical changes.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes DFW as the trustee for the fish and wildlife  
            resources of California and prohibits any act which could  
            directly or indirectly "take" threatened or endangered species  
            listed under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA)  
            unless authorized by DFW.

          2)Requires DFW authorization if an action could affect an  
            endangered or rare native plant unless it fits into an  
            exemption for agricultural activities, timber operations or  
            mining.

          3)Requires a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement with DFW in  
            order to protect and conserve fish and wildlife resources if  
            an activity could change the bed, bank or channel of a stream  
            or lake.

          4)States that specified activities to assure the maintenance,  








                                                                  AB 2193
                                                                  Page  5

            restoration, or enhancement of a natural resource, including  
            small habitat restoration projects for fish, plants or  
            wildlife that do not exceed five acres in size, are  
            categorically exempt from further review under the CEQA.

          5)Provides DFW with an expedited mechanism to approve specific  
            types of voluntary on-the-ground habitat restoration projects  
            that benefit Coho salmon.  Projects eligible for the approval  
            are limited to projects within a region described in an  
            adopted state or federal Coho salmon recovery plan that do one  
            or more of the following:  restore stream banks, modify water  
            crossings, or place wood to enhance habitat or increase stream  
            complexity.  Eligible projects are also limited to projects  
            that are less than five acres in size or 500 linear feet.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill would enact the Habitat  
          Restoration and Enhancement Act to require the director of DFW  
          to approve small habitat restoration and enhancement projects  
          that meet specified criteria.  The director would be required to  
          approve the project if it will maintain existing levels of human  
          health and safety protection, including but not limited to flood  
          protection, and meets additional requirements, including that  
          the project is a voluntary project not required for mitigation,  
          is no larger than five acres in size, is consistent with federal  
          or state recovery plans or guidelines, and will not result in  
          cumulative negative environmental impacts.  The director's  
          approval would be in lieu of other permits, agreements or  
          licenses.  The director would be required within 30 days of  
          receiving a written request for approval of a habitat  
          restoration or enhancement project to determine whether the  
          request includes all of the required information, including a  
          full description of the project, an assessment of the project  
          area, a description of environmental protection measures  
          incorporated into the project, and substantial evidence that the  
          project meets specified requirements.  This bill as passed by  
          the Assembly also defined a habitat restoration and enhancement  
          project for purposes of this bill, authorized the DFW to impose  
          a schedule of fees for projects, and created the Habitat  
          Restoration and Enhancement Account within the Fish and Game  
          Preservation Fund.   

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, minor and absorbable costs to the Habitat Restoration  
          and Enhancement Account within the Fish and Game Preservation  
          Fund (special) to DFW for increased and expedited permit review.  








                                                                  AB 2193
                                                                  Page  6

           Unknown fee revenues, but likely minor, to the Habitat  
          Restoration and Enhancement Account.

           COMMENTS  :  This purpose of this bill is to provide private  
          landowners, conservation organizations and local public agencies  
          with streamlined access to environmental permits required for  
          small ecosystem and urban watershed restoration projects.  By  
          providing an efficient pathway for regulatory compliance, this  
          bill seeks to create new opportunities for much needed rural,  
          urban, coastal, and inland ecosystem restoration projects.

          The Senate amendments modify the criteria and definitions, add  
          additional specificity regarding the information that would need  
          to be included in an application for approval, and provide  
          further details regarding the approval process.  The definition  
          of eligible habitat restoration and enhancement projects is  
          modified to limit the bill's application to small habitat  
          restoration projects that meet the eligibility requirements for  
          the State Water Resources Control Board's Order for Clean Water  
          Act Section 401 General Water Quality Certification for Small  
          Habitat Restoration Projects program.  That certification  
          program applies to small habitat projects that are eligible for  
          a CEQA categorical exemption under California Code of  
          Regulations, Title 14, Section 15333 for small habitat  
          restoration projects, do not exceed five acres in size or a  
          cumulative total of 500 linear feet of stream bank or coastline,  
          have a construction period that does not exceed five years, and  
          are not a compensatory mitigation project.  Code of Regulations  
          Section 15333 provides a categorical exemption from CEQA for  
          small habitat restoration projects that do not exceed five acres  
          in size to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or  
          protection of habitat for fish, plants, or wildlife, provided  
          that there will be no significant adverse impact on endangered,  
          rare or threatened species or their habitat, there are no  
          hazardous materials at or around the project site that may be  
          disturbed or removed, and the project will not result in  
          significant cumulative impacts.  Examples of small habitat  
          restoration projects that may qualify under the Water Board's  
          Section 401 Certification Order and this bill include  
          re-vegetation of disturbed areas with native plant species,  
          wetland restoration to improve conditions for waterfowl, stream  
          or river bank re-vegetation to improve habitat for amphibians or  
          native fish, stream or river bank stabilization with native  
          vegetation or other bioengineering techniques to reduce erosion  
          and sedimentation, and culvert replacement to improve habitat.   








                                                                  AB 2193
                                                                  Page  7

          A different process is established for projects that have  
          already been certified under the State Water Board's Section 401  
          Certification Order, and projects that meet the eligibility  
          requirements for the State Water Board's program but have not  
          yet been certified under that program.  The Senate amendments  
          also add liability protection for state agencies participating  
          in the process established by this bill and add a seven year  
          sunset clause.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Diane Colborn / W., P. & W. / (916)  
          319-2096


                                                               FN: 0005415