BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2272
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 30, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 2272 (Gray) - As Introduced: February 21, 2014
Policy Committee: LaborVote:5-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill specifies that "public work" for purposes of
prevailing wage law includes projects funded by the California
Advanced Services Fund (CASF).
FISCAL EFFECT
The Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) estimates costs of
approximately $280,000 to Division of Labor Standards
Enforcement for increased enforcement and investigations.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose. This bill, sponsored by the California-Nevada
Conference of Operating Engineers, codifies a recent DIR
determination that public works funded in whole or in part by
the CASF are subject to California's prevailing wage
requirements. According to the author, this change in law
provides clarity to contractors who are bidding on CASF-funded
projects and to labor standards officers who are responsible
for enforcing labor laws on the project.
2)Background . CASF, administered by the Public Utilities
Commission, provides grants to telephone corporations to
provide broadband access and build out facilities in unserved
and underserved areas in the state.
This bill is in response to a petition to DIR challenging
prevailing wage requirements. The Central Valley Next Generation
Broadband Infrastructure Project (CVNGBIP) is a 1,371 mile
fiber-optic infrastructure project through 18 counties. The
$66.6 million project is funded through federal, state and local
AB 2272
Page 2
funds. CVNGBIP petitioned DIR challenging the prevailing wage
requirements because state funds constitute only 10% of the
project's total budget. In November 2013, DIR issued a letter
making the determination that because CVNGBIP is partially
funded with state funds, it is a "public work" subject to
California's prevailing wage requirements.
Since this determination, DIR has issued one penalty assessment
related to the CVNGBIP. The construction firm that received the
penalty filed for a review of the assessment in February 2014.
Analysis Prepared by : Misty Feusahrens / APPR. / (916)
319-2081