BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2272
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2272 (Gray)
          As Amended  August 22, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |56-17|(May 27, 2014)  |SENATE: |23-11|(August 26,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    L. & E.  

           SUMMARY  :  Specifies that "public work" for purposes of  
          prevailing wage law also means infrastructure project grants  
          from the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) pursuant to  
          existing law.

           The Senate amendments  :

          1)Specify that the bill applies to "infrastructure project  
            grants" from the CASF, rather than "projects funded" by the  
            CASF.

          2)Clarify that, for purposes of this requirement, the Public  
            Utilities Commission is not the awarding body or the body  
            awarding the contract as defined in existing law under the  
            Labor Code.

          3)Add language to avoid a chaptering out conflict with AB 26  
            (Bonilla) of the current legislative session.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill specified that "public  
          work" for purposes of prevailing wage law also means projects  
          funded by the CASF.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill will result in annual costs of  
          approximately $280,000 to the Department of Industrial Relations  
          for increased enforcement costs.  The bill would also result in  
          one-time costs of $75,000 to determine any necessary changes to  
          existing CASF infrastructure grants.  Finally, the bill would  
          result in unknown cost pressures, likely in the tens of millions  
          of dollars, to the CASF as a result of increased projects costs  
          for existing and future projects.









                                                                  AB 2272
                                                                  Page  2

           COMMENTS  :  The CASF program was established to encourage  
          deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to  
          all Californians that will promote economic growth, job  
          creation, and the substantial social benefits of advanced  
          information and communications technologies.  Existing law  
          establishes the goal of the program as, by no later than  
          December 31, 2015, to approve funding for infrastructure  
          projects that will provide broadband access to no less than 98%  
          of California households.

          The Central Valley Next Generation Broadband Infrastructure  
          Project is a 1,371 mile fiber-optic infrastructure project  
          through 18 counties that will reportedly serve a population of 4  
          million people when completed.  The goal of the project is to  
          provide direct fiber connectivity to 63 anchor institutions,  
          access by another 40 anchor sites, and access to hundreds of  
          thousands of other businesses and residences.  The $66.6 million  
          project is funded through federal, state and local funds, with  
          about 10% of its total funding coming from the CASF discussed  
          above.

          On November 22, 2013, Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)  
          Director Christine Baker issued a determination letter which  
          found that the project, because it is partially funded with  
          state funds, is a public work subject to California's prevailing  
          wage requirements.
          This bill is sponsored by the California-Nevada Conference of  
          Operating Engineers, who argues that this simply codifies the  
          recent DIR determination in statute to avoid confusion and legal  
          questions in the future.  They believe this will give clarity to  
          contractors who are bidding on CASF-funded projects, and to  
          labor standards officers who are responsible for enforcing labor  
          laws on the projects.

          Opponents argue that the DIR determination has been appealed by  
          the interested parties and codifying that decision would be  
          premature.  Additionally, they argue that CASF projects are not  
          state construction contracts awarded by the California Public  
          Utilities Commission, but rather grant recipients, and  
          therefore, clearly fall outside the definition of "public  
          works."  Overall, opponents argue that the Legislature should  
          not codify the DIR's erroneous determination both in light of  
          the pending legal arguments and because this bill would  
          undermine a critical state public policy goal in promoting  
          broadband deployment.  








                                                                  AB 2272
                                                                  Page  3


           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 


                                                                 FN:  
                                                            0005353