BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2275
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 30, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                AB 2275 (Ridley-Thomas) - As Amended:  April 10, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:19-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes the State Registrar, local registrars, or  
          county recorders to accept electronic verification methods in  
          order to furnish certified copies of birth, death, or marriage  
          records.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          This bill is permissive, thus it does not have direct costs to  
          the Department of Public Health (DPH). However, allowing the use  
          of an electronic option results in cost pressure for one-time  
          Information Technology costs to the DPH to establish secure  
          electronic verification methodology for vital records (Health  
          Statistics Special Fund).   

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  This bill is intended to allow state and local  
            officials to use an electronic secure verification mechanism  
            in lieu of a notarized affidavit of identity.  The author  
            states local agencies have established online systems for  
            individuals to request vital records, but the legal  
            requirement for a notarized affidavit poses a barrier to  
            completing the entire process electronically. The author  
            indicates this option will be particularly helpful for persons  
            who may reside overseas, are in the military, or do not have a  
            valid driver's license or identification such as indigent or  
            homeless individuals.  

           2)Support  .  The County of Los Angeles is the sponsor of this  
            bill and writes that in 2012, the County's Registrar received  
            more than 64,000 online requests for vital records, which  








                                                                  AB 2275
                                                                  Page  2

            accounted for 22% of all requests for vital records that year.  
             The County states for every one of these requests the  
            individual had to separately complete an affidavit of identity  
            with a notary.  The County further states that the current  
            process is increasingly out of step with trends to increase  
            access to vital government services through online  
            technologies and that this bill will streamline the request  
            process by allowing people the option to complete their  
            request online without the need to send a separate notarized  
            affidavit.  

            Reed Elsevier/LexisNexis writes in support that Cook County,  
            Illinois has been using electronic notification for records  
            requests for about eight years and New York City for seven  
            years.
                


            3)Prior Legislation  .  AB 464 (Daly), Chapter 78, Statutes of  
            2013 allows for requests of birth, death, and marriage  
            certificates using digitized images of a notarized statement.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081