BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 2341
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 7, 2014
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 2341 (Quirk-Silva) - As Amended: April 10, 2014
Policy Committee: EducationVote:7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: Yes
SUMMARY
This bill requires the California Department of Education (CDE)
to add an indicator to the California Longitudinal Pupil
Achievement Data System (CALPADS) to identify pupils of military
families. Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to add
a reporting process within CALPADS requiring local education
agencies (LEAs) to report the enrollment of pupils of military
families by July 1, 2015.
2)Provides that the data collection pursuant to this requirement
shall not be used to compile reports required by the federal
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), including, but not limited
to, dropout and graduation rates.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)GF administrative costs of approximately $15,000 to CDE to
modify CALPADS to include a new indicator for students of
military families.
2)Unknown GF/Proposition 98 state mandated costs for LEAs to
update user interface with CALPADS and collect and report this
data to CALPADS. For illustration, assuming all LEAs spent an
hour on the required activities, statewide costs of
approximately $380,000.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose. Supporters of the bill, including the Department of
Defense, argue that children in military families experience
AB 2341
Page 2
events that affect their education, such as moving frequently
and having a parent deployed away from the family. Currently,
there is no method of tracking their attendance and progress
to evaluate programs and identify best practices. Including
an indicator in CALPADS would build awareness of students that
may be affected by the deployment of a parent and facilitate
data-driven decision making to improve the distribution of
Department of Defense and local resources to offer appropriate
support.
2)Budget conflict. The CDE indicates that the change required
by this bill is relatively simple and could probably be
achieved in approximately one year. However, the Governor's
2014-15 budget proposes to continue budget language
prohibiting the CDE from adding additional data elements to
CALPADS. Specifically, provisional language states, "As a
further condition of receiving these [federal] funds, the SDE
shall not add additional data elements to CALPADS, require
local educational agencies to use the data collected through
the CALPADS for any purpose, or otherwise expand or enhance
the system beyond the data elements and functionalities that
are identified in the most current approved Feasibility Study
and Special Project Reports and the CALPADS Data guide v4.1."
The Legislature has not yet acted on this issue.
Analysis Prepared by : Misty Feusahrens / APPR. / (916)
319-2081