BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2382
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 21, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 2382 (Bradford) - As Amended:  May 6, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              Human  
          ServicesVote:5 - 0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill eliminates the double penalty assessed against  
          CalWORKS recipients for their children's truancy, if those  
          children are less than 16 years old. Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Deletes the school attendance requirement, solely for the  
            purpose of determining CalWORKs eligibility, for children in  
            the assistance unit under 16 years of age.

          2)Deletes the requirement that any adults in an assistance unit  
            lose aid due to a child in the assistance unit under age 16  
            not meeting the school attendance requirement within CalWORKs  
            eligibility criteria.

          3)Requires counties to inform CalWORKs applicants and recipients  
            of the school attendance requirement for children in the  
            assistance unit who are 16 years of age or older.

          4)Excludes a child who is age 16 or older from being considered  
            in the family's grant calculation for any month in which the  
            county is informed by a school district or a county school  
            attendance review board that the child did not meet school  
            attendance requirements.

          5)Requires that a child whose needs are not considered in the  
            family's grant computation due to not meeting school  
            attendance requirements remain eligible for services that may  
            lead to attendance in school.

          6)Provides that a child shall be presumed to be attending school  
            unless he or she has been deemed a chronic truant pursuant to  








                                                                  AB 2382
                                                                  Page  2

            Section 48263.6 of the Education Code.


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)On-going costs of approximately $4.5 million (TANF/GF) in  
            increased CalWORKs grant costs that would have otherwise been  
            lost to families due to truancy.  This assumes approximately  
            13,000 families will receive an average of $366 over a three  
            month period as a result of removing the penalty.

          2)Potential on-going administrative efficiencies to the extent  
            there are fewer state hearings that would have otherwise  
            challenged the reduced grants.


           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  This bill is intended to eliminate what the author  
            refers to as a double penalty for CalWORKs parents with truant  
            children. The author argues that parents of truant children  
            already face penalties under the law and that it is unfair to  
            penalize CalWORKs parents twice, by reducing the CalWORKs  
            grant in addition to assessing other penalties. In order to  
            accomplish this, the bill removes the attendance requirement  
            as a condition to receiving CalWORKs benefits for parents with  
            children under 16, and cross-references the truancy penalties  
            created by recent legislation.  In doing so, the author hopes  
            this bill will provide stability for poor school children and  
            their families.

           2)Disproportionate impact of the double penalty  :  SB 1317 (Leno)  
            Chapter 647, Statutes of 2010, defined a chronic truant as a  
            pupil subject to compulsory full-time education who is absent  
            from school without a valid excuse for 10% or more days within  
            the school year.  Additionally, the bill established that a  
            parent who fails to reasonably supervise and encourage a  
            pupil's required school attendance, after being offered  
            language-accessible services to address the pupil's truancy,  
            is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding  
            $2,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding  
            one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.  While the  
            primary objective of this legislation was to reduce truancy  
            through penalizing parents, there was no consideration of how  
            the new penalty would affect parents and children in CalWORKs  








                                                                  AB 2382
                                                                  Page  3

            households.

            Families receiving CalWORKs aid must meet state compulsory  
            education requirements and CalWORKs school attendance  
            requirements, both of which result in penalties for  
            noncompliance.  Children under age 16 receiving CalWORKs  
            benefits are not required to participate in welfare-to-work  
            activities, however they are still required to attend school,  
            whereas education is the welfare-to-work activity emphasized  
            for children who are age 16 and older.   

            In addition to the fines, misdemeanor charges, and potential  
            imprisonment a truant child's parent might face, there are  
            monetary penalties for families with truant children receiving  
            CalWORKs assistance.  If a child in a CalWORKs family under  
            age 16 does not meet school attendance requirements, the grant  
            of any aided adult in the household is eliminated unless the  
            county determines good cause exists.  If a child age 16 or  
            older doesn't meet school attendance requirements, his or her  
            grant amount is eliminated.  In both cases, the family's  
            minimal CalWORKs grant amount is reduced in addition to the  
            imposition of civil penalties against the parent.  This double  
            penalty for truancy doesn't exist for any other group of  
            children. 

           3)Prior Legislation  . This bill is a narrowed version of AB 814  
            (Bradford) 2013. That bill was held on this committee's  
            Suspense File.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081