BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2388
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 7, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                   AB 2388 (Hagman) - As Amended:  April 30, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              Public  
          SafetyVote:  7-0                               

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Judicial Council to, by January 2016,  
          prepare, adopt, and annually revise an advisory statewide bail  
          schedule for all bailable felony offenses and for all  
          misdemeanor and infraction offenses, except Vehicle Code  
          infractions, that counties may reference when setting a  
          countywide bail schedule. Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires the Judicial Council to appoint a group of judges, as  
            specified, to develop and approve the statewide bail schedule  
            in consultation with the California District Attorneys  
            Association, the California Public Defenders Association,  
            California Attorneys for Criminal Justice; and the California  
            State Sheriffs' Association.

          2)Requires the statewide bail schedule to contain a list of the  
            offenses and the amounts of bail applicable for each as the  
            Judicial Council determines to be appropriate; and if the  
            schedule does not list all offenses specifically, it shall  
            contain a general clause for designated amounts of bail as the  
            Judicial Council determines appropriate for offenses not  
            specifically listed.

          3)States the Judicial Council shall adopt California Rules of  
            Court consistent with the provisions in this bill.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)One-time costs in the range of $200,000 to the Judicial  
            Council to establish a statewide bail schedule and for  
            adopting a rule of court. This assumes the equivalent of one  








                                                                  AB 2388
                                                                  Page  2

            personnel year plus travel and per diem. 

          2)Ongoing costs to maintain and update the bail schedule,  
            assuming 20% of the initial development costs, would be about  
            $40,000. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . This bill creates an advisory statewide bail  
            schedule that counties may reference when setting their own  
            countywide bail schedules.  The purpose of the advisory  
            statewide bail schedule is to provide guidelines to create  
            more consistency in the countywide schedules.

           2)Current law  provides it is the duty of the superior court in  
            each county to prepare, adopt, and annually revise a uniform  
            countywide schedule of bail for all bailable felony offenses  
            and for all misdemeanor and infraction offenses except Vehicle  
            Code infractions. (The penalty schedule for infraction  
            violations of the Vehicle Code is established by the Judicial  
            Council.)
            Allows a court, by local rule, to prescribe the procedure by  
            which the uniform countywide schedule of bail is prepared,  
            adopted, and annually revised. 

           3)Opposition  . According to the California District Attorneys  
            Association, "Prosecutors agree with current law that permits  
            superior court judges in each county to set their own bail  
            schedule.  This statute recognizes that bail amounts and  
            decisions, like other aspects of our criminal justice system  
            such as policing policies, charging decisions, and sentencing  
            determinations, can vary based on community characteristics  
            and standards.  By requiring the creation of a statewide bail  
            schedule and then giving no direction as to the purpose it is  
            to serve, this bill will invite litigation as to why a  
            particular court did not consult or follow the statewide bail  
            schedule.  The last thing our overburdened courts need is an  
            increased workload and that is all this bill will achieve.

            "Additionally, because the ways in which law enforcement  
            protects public safety and guarantees defendant appearance  
            (the key notions underlying bail) are not the same in every  
            jurisdiction, the virtue of a statewide uniform criminal bail  
            schedule is illusory."









                                                                  AB 2388
                                                                  Page  3

           4)Prior legislation  . 

             a)   AB 1118 (Hagman), 2013, was similar to this bill, failed  
               passage in the Senate Committee on Public Safety, and was  
               granted reconsideration. It is not clear why the author  
               needs a second vehicle (AB 2388) in this session. 

             b)   AB 1264 (Hagman), 2011, which repealed the uniform  
               countywide schedule of bail and established a Statewide  
               Bail Commission was never heard.    


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081