BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2408
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2408 (Allen)
          As Amended  June 10, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0 |(May 15, 2014)  |SENATE: |35-0 |(July 3, 2014) |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    ED.  

           SUMMARY  :  Expands the governing board of the California  
          Collaborative for Education Excellence (CCEE) from five to seven  
          members by adding a representative of charter schools and a  
          parent of a California public school pupil.  

           The Senate amendments  strike the requirement that the charter  
          school representative and the parent be appointed by the  
          Governor and instead require the charter school representative  
          to be appointed by the Senate Rules Committee and the parent to  
          be appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the CCEE, whose purpose is to advise and assist  
            local education agencies (LEAs) in achieving the goals set  
            forth in their local control and accountability plans (LCAPs).

          2)Requires the CCEE to be governed by a board consisting of the  
            following members:

             a)   The Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) or his or  
               her designee;

             b)   The president of the State Board of Education (SBE) or  
               his or her designee;

             c)   A county superintendent of schools appointed by the  
               Senate Rules Committee;

             d)   A teacher appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly; and

             e)   A superintendent of a school district appointed by the  
               Governor.









                                                                  AB 2408
                                                                  Page  2

          3)Requires the SPI, in consultation with the SBE, to contract  
            with an LEA to serve as the fiscal agent for the CCEE.

          4)Requires the fiscal agent, at the direction of the CCEE  
            governing board, to contract with individuals, LEAs, or  
            organizations with the expertise, experience, and a record of  
            success to provide assistance to LEAs that are failing to meet  
            specified performance objectives.

          5)Authorizes the SPI to direct the CCEE to advise and assist an  
            LEA in any of the following circumstances:

             a)   The governing board of the LEA requests the advice and  
               assistance of the CCEE;

             b)   The superintendent of schools in the county in which the  
               school district or charter school is located determines  
               that the advice and assistance of the CCEE is necessary to  
               help the school district or charter school accomplish the  
               goals it has set in its LCAP; or

             c)   The SPI determines the advice and assistance of the CCEE  
               is necessary to help an LEA accomplish the goals it has set  
               in its LCAP.

          6)Requires LEAs to adopt an LCAP by July 1, 2014, using a  
            template adopted by the SBE and requires that the LCAP:

             a)   Be updated every year and renewed every three years;

             b)   Be developed in consultation with teachers, principals,  
               administrators, other school personnel, parents, and  
               pupils;

             c)   Include annual achievement goals for all pupils,  
               including specified pupil subgroups, and a description of  
               actions that will be taken to achieve those goals;

             d)   Address the following eight state priorities:

               i)     Requirements related to the Williams v. State of  
                 California (2004) settlement agreement related to fully  
                 credentialed teachers, instructional materials, and  
                 school facilities;









                                                                  AB 2408
                                                                  Page  3

               ii)    Implementation of academic and performance  
                 standards, including English language development  
                 standards;

               iii)   Parental involvement;

               iv)    Pupil achievement, as measured by statewide  
                 assessments;

               v)     Pupil engagement, as measured by attendance, dropout  
                 and graduation rates, and expulsions/suspensions;

               vi)    School climate, as measured by suspension rates,  
                 expulsion rates, and other local measures, such as  
                 surveys;

               vii)   The extent to which pupils have access to and are  
                 enrolled in a broad course of study; and

               vii) Pupil outcomes, if available, for non-state-assessed  
          courses of study.

             e)   Be aligned with the district's budget and describe how  
               the district will "increase or improve services for  
               unduplicated pupils in proportion to its increase in funds  
               apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration of  
               unduplicated pupils in the district."

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.
           COMMENTS  :  The CCEE and LCAP were both established as the  
          accountability component of the Local Control Funding Formula,  
          which was enacted with last year's budget.  The purpose of the  
          CCEE is to provide advice and assistance to LEAs that  
          persistently fail to achieve specified pupil outcome goals.   
          LEAs also may seek assistance from the CCEE on their own.  

          Existing law requires the SPI, with the approval of the SBE, to  
          contract with an LEA or a consortium of LEAs to serve as the  
          CCEE's fiscal agent.  In addition, existing law requires the  
          CCEE to be governed by a board consisting of the following:

          1)The SPI or his or her designee;

          2)The president of the SBE or his or her designee;








                                                                  AB 2408
                                                                  Page  4


          3)A county superintendent of schools appointed by the Senate  
            Rules Committee;

          4)A teacher appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly; and

          5)A superintendent of a school district appointed by the  
            Governor.

          The CCEE board has only one statutory function:  to direct the  
          fiscal agent to "contract with individuals, local educational  
          agencies, or organizations with the expertise, experience, and a  
          record of success" to provide advice and assistance to LEAs.   
          The areas of expertise and experience required of the  
          individuals, LEAs, or organizations with whom the fiscal agent  
          contracts must include, but not necessarily be limited to, the  
          following:

          1)The eight state priorities that must be addressed by the LCAP;

          2)Improving the quality of teaching;

          3)Improving the quality of school district and schoolsite  
            leadership; and

          4)Successfully addressing the needs of special pupil  
            populations, including, but not limited to, English learners,  
            pupils eligible to receive a free or reduced-price meal,  
            pupils in foster care, and individuals with exceptional needs.

          Need for the bill.  Supporters focus on the additional seat for  
          a charter school representative and argue that "because the  
          Collaborative is intended to provide support and high-stakes  
          reviews of charter schools, we believe that it is essential to  
          include a charter school representative to the Collaborative."

          There is no opposition on file.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Rick Pratt / ED. / (916) 319-2087 


                                                               FN: 0004191 










                                                                  AB 2408
                                                                  Page  5