BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 2408|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2408
          Author:   Allen (R), et al.
          Amended:  8/12/14 in Senate
          Vote:     21


           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 6/4/14
          AYES:  Liu, Wyland, Block, Hancock, Huff, Monning
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Correa, Vacancy, Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 5/15/14 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote


           SUBJECT  :    California Collaborative for Educational Excellence

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill expands the governing board of the  
          California Collaborative for Education Excellence (CCEE) from  
          five to seven members by adding a representative of charter  
          schools, appointed by the Senate Rules Committee, and a parent  
          of a California public school pupil, appointed by the Speaker of  
          the Assembly.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/12/14 add double jointing language  
          to avoid chaptering out issues with SB 1248 (Lara).

           ANALYSIS  :    AB 97 (Assembly Committee on Budget Chapter 47,  
          Statutes of 2013), and subsequent legislation, created the Local  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2408
                                                                     Page  
          2

          Control Funding Formula (LCFF), which consolidated most of the  
          state's categorical programs with the discretionary revenue  
          limit funding to create a new student formula phased in over  
          eight years.  One of the main principles behind the LCFF is that  
          English learners and low-income students require more attention  
          and resources in the classroom than students who do not have  
          these same challenges.  By providing more services (and in turn,  
          funding) to these student populations, it is widely believed  
          that this will help to close the achievement gap and help all  
          students perform better.

          In addition to the new LCFF, the 2013 Budget also established a  
          new system for school accountability.  Under the new system,  
          school districts, county offices of education, and charter  
          schools are required to complete a Local Control and  
          Accountability Plan (LCAP).  The LCAP must include a district's  
          annual goals in each of the eight state priority areas, which  
          include: 

           Student achievement.
           Student engagement.
           Other student outcomes.
           School climate.
           Implementation of the Common Core State Standards.
           Course access.
           Basic services.
           Parental involvement.

          The plans must include both district wide goals and goals for  
          specific subgroups.  Districts are required to consult with  
          stakeholders on their plans and hold at least two public  
          hearings before adopting or updating their LCAP.

          The new LCFF also created a new system of school district  
          support and intervention.  The CCEE was created in order to  
          provide advice and assistance to local educational agencies  
          (LEAs).  Under the new system, if an LEA does not meet  
          performance expectations in the eight state priority areas, they  
          will be subject to intervention by their County Office of  
          Education or the CCEE.  LEAs that are continuously not meeting  
          performance standards, as specified, will be subject to  
          intervention by the State Board of Education (SBE) and the  
          Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI).  However, LEAs also  
          may seek assistance from the CCEE on their own.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2408
                                                                     Page  
          3


          Existing law specifies that the CCEE shall be governed by a  
          board consisting of the following five members:  (a) the SPI or  
          his/her designee; (b) the President of the SBE or his/her  
          designee; (c) a superintendent of a county office of education  
          appointed by the Senate Rules Committee; (d) a teacher appointed  
          by the Speaker of the Assembly; and (e) a superintendent of a  
          school district appointed by the Governor.

          In addition, existing law specifies that, at the direction of  
          the board of the CCEE, the fiscal agent shall contract with  
          individuals, as well as local educational agencies or  
          organizations with expertise, experience, and a record of  
          success to carry out the purposes of LCFF implementation.

          This bill expands the governing board of the CCEE from five to  
          seven members by adding a representative of charter schools,  
          appointed by the Senate Rules Committee, and a parent of a  
          California public school pupil, appointed by the Speaker of the  
          Assembly.

           Background
           
          According to the Senate Education Committee analysis, the 2013  
          Budget appropriated $10 million to establish this new system of  
          support through the CCEE.  The California Department of  
          Education (CDE) has not yet started this work.  CDE recommended,  
          and the SBE approved, the selection of Riverside County Office  
          of Education as the fiscal agent for the CCEE.  The  
          Administration is proposing to extend the use of these funds  
          until June 30, 2015.  Because the number of districts that will  
          need assistance is unknown and the role of the CCEE is still  
          unclear, the cost of the new support and intervention system  
          going forward has yet to be determined.  The Governor's Proposed  
          2014 Budget does not include ongoing funding for the CCEE, but  
          the Administration will be considering ongoing funding as the  
          system is further developed.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/13/14)

          California Charter Schools Association Advocates

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    AB 2408
                                                                     Page  
          4

          Charter School Capital
          Charter Schools Development Center
          EdVoice
          K-12 Inc.
          Students First

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office, in  
          order to address the academic needs of California's students,  
          every aspect of the California education system should be  
          represented; not just the narrow focus of one special interest  
          that may not understand the unique needs of charter schools or  
          are indifferent to meaningful parental involvement.  The  
          substantial growth of charter schools demonstrates the need for  
          charter schools and parents to be meaningfully represented on  
          the CCEE.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 5/15/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Ch�vez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hern�ndez,  
            Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal,  
            Maienschein, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,  
            Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. P�rez, V.  
            Manuel P�rez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Mansoor, Vacancy


          PQ:e  8/13/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****








                                                                CONTINUED