BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          AB 2434 (Gomez) - Income Taxes: Exclusion
          
          Amended: May 19, 2014           Policy Vote: G&F 6-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 4, 2014                            
          Consultant: Robert Ingenito     
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.


          Bill Summary: AB 2434 would exclude from gross income amounts  
          received as a rebate, voucher, or other financial incentive  
          issued by a local water agency for participation in a turf  
          removal water conservation program. The exclusion would be in  
          effect for taxable years 2014 through 2018.

          Fiscal Impact: The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) indicates that the  
          bill would result in estimated revenue losses (General Fund) of  
          $100,000 in 2014-15, $80,000 in 2015-16, and $80,000 in 2016-17.  
          The bill would not significantly impact FTB's administrative  
          costs.

          Background: Current law excludes from gross income any subsidy  
          provided by a public utility for the purchase or installation of  
          any "energy conservation measure".  An "energy conservation  
          measure", in turn, is defined as any installation or  
          modification primarily designed to reduce the consumption of  
          electricity or natural gas or to improve the management of  
          energy demand in a dwelling unit, as specified.

          Current law also provides that amounts received as a rebate from  
          a local water or energy agency or supplier for expenses incurred  
          to purchase or install a water conservation water closet, water  
          and energy efficient clothes washer, or a specified plumbing  
          device are treated as a refund or price adjustment of amounts  
          payable to that agency or supplier.  

          Current law provides an exclusion for any rebate, voucher, or  
          other financial incentive issued by the California Energy  
          Commission, the Public Utility Commission, or a local publicly  
          owned electric utility, for an expense incurred by a taxpayer to  
          purchase or install a specified thermal system, solar system,  








          AB 2434 (Gomez)
          Page 1


          wind energy system, or a fuel cell generating system.

          Proposed Law: This bill would exclude from gross income under  
          both the personal income tax and corporation tax laws any amount  
          received as a rebate, voucher, or other financial incentive  
          issued by a local water or energy agency or supplier for  
          expenses incurred to participate in a water or energy  
          conservation program.

          Related Legislation: AB 1968 (Nation), Chapter 843, Statutes of  
          2002, provided an exclusion for specified rebates and vouchers  
          issued for expenses paid or incurred by a taxpayer to purchase  
          or install a thermal system, solar system, wind energy system,  
          or a fuel cell generating system.  

          Staff Comments: Local governments have recently established  
          rebate programs to encourage reduced water consumption.  For  
          example, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California  
          offers a rebate based on each square foot of water-intensive  
          turf removed. Likewise, the City of Sacramento recently launched  
          a "cash for grass" program that will provide rebates to  
          homeowners who replace their lawns with drought-tolerant  
          landscaping. Increased offering and participation in such  
          programs will likely increase as the State's current drought  
          continues. 

          However, it is unclear whether such rebate payments are legally  
          included in a recipient's gross income and are, thus, considered  
          taxable under current law.  While existing law specifically  
          excludes specific rebates from gross income (such as those  
          provided for installing a specified thermal or solar system), it  
          does not appear to include many other rebate programs, including  
          the turf-removal rebate programs noted above. This bill seeks to  
          provide clarity on the issue.