BILL ANALYSIS �
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE BILL NO: AB 2441
SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN AUTHOR: mullin
VERSION: 6/11/14
Analysis by: Eric Thronson FISCAL: yes
Hearing date: June 17, 2014
SUBJECT:
Billboard advertising displays
DESCRIPTION:
This bill clarifies that advertising displays visible from any
highway cannot appear to be an official public agency changeable
message sign.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law restricts advertising displays along public roads
in a variety of ways, including where displays can be placed and
what material they may present. For example, advertising
displays cannot be placed in highway rights-of-way or within any
stream or drainage channel. In addition, no advertising
displays visible from any highway can simulate or imitate any
directional, warning, danger, or information sign permitted by
existing law.
This bill clarifies that advertising displays visible from any
highway cannot appear to be an official public agency changeable
message sign.
COMMENTS:
1.Purpose . Recent studies suggest that real-time traffic
information on changeable message signs has gained popularity
in congested urban areas. Further, displaying accurate travel
times helps commuters assess traffic, alleviates driver
stress, and allows drivers to make better route decisions.
According to the author, this bill ensures the continued
effectiveness of changeable message signs by prohibiting
advertising displays that appear to be official changeable
message signs, but that are simply advertisements.
2.Necessary ? Existing law restricts billboards from simulating
AB 2441 (MULLIN) Page 2
or imitating directional or information signs. This bill
clarifies that billboards cannot appear to be a changeable
message sign, which is an informational sign operated by the
state or local government. While it may be helpful to clarify
that changeable message signs are specifically not permitted,
it is unclear whether this clarification is necessary.
For example, the author has provided a photo of a billboard in
the San Francisco area that appeared to be a changeable
message sign, but was in fact an advertisement. The owner has
since removed the sign, upon Caltrans' formal request, based
on the fact that it violates existing law. Had the owner not
removed the advertisement, Caltrans would have begun issuing
fines as per the state's regular monitoring and enforcement
process.
Assembly Votes:
Floor: 70-4
Appr: 16-1
GO: 17-1
POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on
Wednesday, June 11,
2014.)
SUPPORT: None received.
OPPOSED: None received.