BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2455
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2455 (Williams)
          As Amended  June 17, 2014
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |70-3 |(May 1, 2014)   |SENATE: |31-0 |(August 26,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2014)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    L. GOV.  

           SUMMARY  :  Allows, until January 1, 2025, the Santa Rita Hills  
          Community Services District (District) to change the size of its  
          board of directors.  

           The Senate amendments  :  

          1)Allow the District, if the board of directors has been reduced  
            to three members, to increase the board to five members, as  
            specified.  

          2)Require the District to hold a public hearing regarding the  
            proposal to increase the number of directors.  Require notice  
            of the public hearing to be given by placing a display  
            advertisement at least one-eighth page in a newspaper of  
            general circulation for three weeks, pursuant to existing law,  
            and by United States first-class mail to each landowner voter  
            in the district, as specified.  Require the envelope or cover  
            of the mailing to include the name of the local agency and the  
            return address of the sender and the mailed notice to be in at  
            least 10-point type.  

          3)Require the public hearing to be held at least 45 days after  
            mailing the notice pursuant to 2) above.  

          4)Require the District board of directors to receive and  
            consider at the hearing any written or oral comments regarding  
            the proposed increase in the number of directors.  

          5)Require the District board of directors, after receiving and  
            considering the comments, by a majority vote, on the record,  
            to do one of the following:

             a)   Disapprove the proposal; or, 








                                                                  AB 2455
                                                                  Page  2


             b)   Adopt a resolution that orders the increase in the  
               number of members of the board to five members.  Prohibits  
               the board from subsequently reducing the number of  
               directors back to three directors.  

          6)Make changes to the sunset date to repeal provisions of the  
            bill on January 1, 2025.  

          7)Require a petition signed by a majority of voters requesting a  
            reduction in the number of board directors to be submitted to  
            the board of directors prior to the board adopting a  
            resolution to propose the reduction.  




           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the Community Services District (CSD) Law which  
            requires a CSD board of directors to consist of five members  
            and establishes four-year terms.  

          2)Authorizes the board of directors to be elected at large, by  
            division, or from divisions, if a majority of the voters  
            voting on the question are in favor at a general district or  
            special election.  Requires a CSD candidate for the board of  
            directors to be a voter of the district.  Requires a CSD  
            candidate for the board of directors that is elected by  
            division to be a voter from that division.  

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill:  

          1)Allowed the District board of directors to consist of three  
            members, instead of five as required by current law, until  
            January 1, 2035.  

          2)Required the District board of directors, prior to reducing  
            the board, to adopt by a majority vote a resolution proposing  
            to reduce the number of directors to three members.  

          3)Required the District to hold a public hearing regarding the  
            proposal to reduce the number of directors.  

          4)Required notice of the public hearing to be given by placing a  








                                                                  AB 2455
                                                                  Page  3

            display advertisement at least one-eighth page in a newspaper  
            of general circulation for three weeks, pursuant to existing  
            law, and by United States first-class mail to each landowner  
            voter in the district, as specified.  Required the envelope or  
            cover of the mailing to include the name of the local agency  
            and the return address of the sender and the mailed notice to  
            be in at least 10-point type.  

          5)Required the public hearing to be held at least 45 days after  
            mailing the notice pursuant to 4) above.  

          6)Required the District board of directors to receive and  
            consider at the hearing any written or oral comments regarding  
            the proposed reduction in the number of directors.  

          7)Required the District board of directors, after receiving and  
            considering the comments, by a majority vote, on the record,  
            to do one of the following:

             a)   Disapprove the proposal; or, 

             b)   Adopt a resolution that orders the reduction in the  
               number of members of the board to three members.  

          8)Prohibited a reduction in the number of directors from  
            affecting the term of office of any director.  Required a  
            director currently holding office as of the effective date of  
            the reduction in the number of member of the board to continue  
            to be the director until the office becomes vacant by means of  
            term expiration or otherwise.  

          9)Made conforming changes within CSD Law.  

          10)Found and declared that a special statute is necessary  
            because of the unique circumstances applicable only to the  
            District.  
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)Author's statement.  According to the author, "This bill  
            addresses a district specific problem.  The District is facing  
            a declining pool of candidates to serve on their board of  
            directors.  As such, this bill allows them to temporarily  








                                                                  AB 2455
                                                                  Page  4

            reduce their board membership from five to three members.  
             
             "The District is a 'roads' district formed in 2009 by a vote  
            of property owners.  It was created to serve a small community  
            of Santa Rita Hills which consists of 39 parcels in Santa  
            Barbara County.  The power and responsibilities granted to the  
            District include the act to acquire, construct, improve and  
            maintain streets, roads, bridges and sidewalks.  Any road  
            improvements or infrastructure constructed by the District  
            must be related to the authorized services and any significant  
            costs for construction will be financed by benefit assessments  
            approved by landowners within the District.  

            "Because much of the district is comprised of parcels of land,  
            there are only between 10-12 actual voters residing in the  
            district, some of which are in the process of moving outside  
            the district.  Additionally, Santa Barbara County currently  
            has a restriction that prohibits new residences from being  
            built in the district until upgrades in road access is  
            provided, thereby limiting the potential for new registered  
            voters within the district.  

            "At present day, the board currently has one vacancy and  
            consists of only four members.  The vacancy was created by a  
            member who moved out of the area.  Additionally, one of the  
            four remaining board members continues to travel for military  
            support out of the county; therefore the board has a bare  
            quorum of three with which to conduct business.  Additional  
            vacancies are expected in the near future leaving the board in  
            a situation where they may lose quorum to conduct business.   
            As required by law, the board gave notice to the county about  
            their board vacancy last year.  To date, the county has been  
            unable to find a replacement for the resignation."

          2)Purpose of this bill.  There are over 300 CSDs in California  
            that provide up to 32 different services, including water,  
            garbage collection, wastewater management, security, fire  
            protection, and public recreation.  SB 135 (Kehoe), Chapter  
            249, Statutes of 2005, required all CSDs to have a five-member  
            board of directors, as part of the rewrite of the CSD Law.   
            The board of directors are elected by resident voters for  
            four-year terms.  

            This bill allows the District to decrease their board of  
            directors to three members and to increase their board of  








                                                                  AB 2455
                                                                  Page  5

            directors back up to five members, until January 1, 2025.   
            Under this bill the board would have to comply with a number  
            of hearing and notification requirements in order to pass a  
            resolution with a majority vote to reduce or increase their  
            board membership.  This bill also requires a petition signed  
            by a majority of voters requesting a reduction in the board of  
            directors prior to the passage of a resolution.  This bill  
            would not impact the term of any board member currently in  
            office.  This bill is sponsored by the District.  
          3)Local government governance structure and previous  
            legislation.  In some cases, state law requires voter approval  
            before a local government can change their governance  
            structure.  For example, cities must get majority-voter  
            approval to change the number of council members.   
            Additionally, current law requires a majority-voter approval  
            in fire protection districts to increase or decrease the size  
            of their boards.  

            The Legislature has authorized special districts to increase  
            or decrease the size of boards 
            of directors by both amending the principal act, like for  
            water conservation districts (SB 235 (Negrete McLeod), Chapter  
            122, Statutes of 2011), and by making specific exceptions for  
            individual special districts.  For example, SB 210 (Local  
            Government Committee), Chapter 176, Statutes of 2001,  
            authorized the Sawyers Bar County Water District (Siskiyou  
            County) to decrease the size of their board from five to three  
            members.  Sawyers Bar only had 14 registered voters at the  
            time SB 210 was making its way through the process.  SB 210  
            authorized their board of directors to reduce its membership  
            if a majority of the district's voters signed a petition  
            requesting that reduction.  Alternatively, instead of  
            requiring direct action from the voters, SB 235 authorized  
            water conservation districts with a board consisting of seven  
            directors to reduce the number of directors to five by a  
            resolution adopted by two-thirds of the board.  The hearing  
            and notification requirements in SB 235 and the petition  
            requirements in SB 210 are substantially similar to this bill.  
             

          4)Policy considerations.  The Legislature may wish to consider  
            the following issues:  

             a)   Other options.  Given the current governance challenges  
               faced by the District, the Legislature may wish to consider  








                                                                  AB 2455
                                                                  Page  6

               if the District should be consolidated or dissolved instead  
               of just reducing board membership.  The Legislature may  
               wish to consider if this bill is attempting to provide a  
               temporary solution for a longstanding systemic issue that  
               may be better addressed by the Santa Barbara Local Agency  
               Formation Commission.  

             b)   What will change?  The Legislature may wish to ask the  
               author what circumstances outlined in the reasoning  
               provided for the purpose of the bill will change to warrant  
               the need to return back to a five-member board within the  
               next 10 years?  

             c)   Purpose of the District.  The District continues to face  
               challenges with fulfilling the purpose of the District to  
               design and construct a system of roads to provide access to  
               existing parcels within the CSD.  The Legislature may wish  
               to consider whether the purpose of the District can  
               actually be fulfilled in light of the broader challenges  
               and if this bill will address any of those issues.  

          5)Arguments in support.  Supporters argue that this bill allows  
            the district to reduce the size of their board until the  
            current requirements can be more easily met in the future -  
            once the roads are improved and property owners are allowed to  
            build their residences.  

          6)Arguments in opposition.  None on file.  
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Misa Yokoi-Shelton / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958                 


                                                                 FN:  
          0004014