BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2533
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 14, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    AB 2533 (Ammiano) - As Amended:  May 6, 2014 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:12-6

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires health plans and insurers, if an enrollee is  
          unable to obtain a medically necessary covered service in an  
          accessible and timely manner from a contracted provider, to  
          arrange for, or assist the enrollee in arranging for, the  
          enrollee to receive the care or service in an accessible and  
          timely manner from a non-contracting provider. It also: 

          1)Prohibits a plan or insurer from imposing cost-sharing for  
            services accessed under this provision from exceeding what an  
            enrollee would pay for services from a contracted provider.

          2)Requires the Insurance Commissioner to promulgate implementing  
            regulations and update them every three years.


          3)Authorizes the IC to investigate and take enforcement action  
            against insurers for violating these and current-law  
            provisions relating to timely access to care. 


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Costs to the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) as  
            follows (Managed Care Fund):

             a)   One-time cost for workload related to issuance of  
               regulations estimated at $250,000.

             b)   Plan licensing and enforcement workload likely in the  
               range of $550,000 for the first year of implementation,  
               $250,000 ongoing. Actual costs will depend on the number of  








                                                                  AB 2533
                                                                  Page  2

               cases brought forth pursuant to the bill.

          2)Costs to the California Department of Insurance  (CDI) as  
            follows (Insurance Fund):

             a)   One-time cost for workload related to issuance of  
               regulations estimated at $280,000 and $25,000 ongoing for  
               revisions.

             b)   Enforcement workload potentially in the low hundreds of  
               thousands of dollars annually, depending on the number of  
               cases brought forth pursuant to the bill. 

           

          COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  . According to the author, this bill is aimed at  
            protecting patients from high out-of-pocket costs when health  
            plans and insurers fail to meet timely access standards.  This  
            bill is sponsored by the California Nurses Association (CNA).

           2)Background  .  AB 2179 (Cohn), Chapter 797, Statutes of 2002,  
            directed DMHC and CDI to adopt regulations to ensure enrollee  
            access to necessary health care services in a timely manner.  

            DMHC Timely Access to Non-Emergency Health Care Services  
            regulation became effective January 17, 2010.  Each health  
            plan must show that its provider network is large and varied  
            enough to offer enrollees appointments that meet the certain  
            waiting time standards.  DMHC regulations already include  
            requirements similar to this bill.  For example, they require  
            health plans to assist enrollees in locating available and  
            accessible contracted providers if they have difficulty  
            finding a contracted provider, and arrange for specialty  
            services from specialists outside of the contracted network if  
            a specialist is not available in the network.

            CDI adopted provider network access regulations to implement  
            AB 2179, imposing specific geographic time and distance  
            standards for contracted providers, full-time hours and  
            availability of providers and minimum provider-to-insured  
            ratios.  CDI is in the process of reviewing and potentially  
            revising the network adequacy and access regulations,  
            consistent with the requirement that DMHC and CDI review the  








                                                                  AB 2533
                                                                  Page  3

            regulations every three years. Unlike DMHC-regulated plans,  
            however, there does not appear to be a current-law requirement  
            for CDI-regulated plans to arrange for insured persons to  
            receive services from a non-contracting provider if a  
            contracting provider is unavailable. 
                                                                      
           3)Opposition  .  Health plans and insurers write in opposition to  
            this bill. DMHC-regulated plans believe the Health and Safety  
            Code requirements are duplicative and slightly broader than  
            existing law governing the provision of timely access to  
            services, and that the bill would require more administrative  
            resources for reporting.   Health plans and insurers believe  
            this bill may threaten the ability of health plans to control  
            costs by increasing enrollee access to non-contracting  
            providers.  

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081