Amended in Assembly April 1, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2549


Introduced by Assembly Member Ridley-Thomas

February 21, 2014


An act to addbegin insert and repealend insert Section 53083.2begin delete toend deletebegin insert ofend insert the Government Code, relating to redevelopment.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2549, as amended, Ridley-Thomas. Redevelopment: City of Milpitas.

Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, dispose of all the assets of the former redevelopment agency, and remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller.

This bill would authorize the City of Milpitasbegin insert, on or before April 1, 2015,end insert to organize an independent localbegin delete agencyend deletebegin insert commission, composed of the city manager, as an ex officio member, and 7 specified members appointed by the Milpitas City Council,end insert to investigate and study the consequences of the dissolution of redevelopment on employment, revenues, and economic activity in order to identify and recommend ways to raise revenues for specified purposes.

begin insert

This bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2017.

end insert

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Milpitas.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) The dissolution of redevelopment by the state has been
4devastating in the City of Milpitas (city) and to its citizens.

5(b) As a result of the dissolution of redevelopment, the city has
6lost $39 million in annual local tax revenues.

7(c) The dissolution of redevelopment has degraded public safety
8in the city as the city has cut employment. Since the 2011-12 fiscal
9year, the city has laid off 110 employees, including 12 firefighters,
10and has been unable to fill 147 other positions that would otherwise
11had been filled, including 13 police officer positions.

12(d) The dissolution of redevelopment has stopped investment
13in previously approved critical infrastructure in the city.begin delete $220 twoend delete
14begin insert Twoend insert hundred twenty million dollars worth of road, water, and
15sewer improvements located within the redevelopment project
16area, which had been approved in the capital improvement plan
17of the city, cannot be constructed. Other projects, including
18infrastructure projects have been delayed due to significant funding
19shortfalls in the city’s general fund to maintain streets. With the
20elimination of redevelopment, the city’s annual shortfall to
21maintain its Metropolitan Transit Commission-mandated Pavement
22Condition Index goal of 70 is $4 million per year.

23(e) The dissolution of redevelopment has stopped previously
24approved development projects in the city, including a 120-room
25hotel and a low- and moderate-income senior housing project.
26With respect to the latter project, the project developer had agreed
27to employ 100 full-time medical and caregiver positions. Both
28projects had completed permits and land use reviews, including
29reviews under the California Environmental Quality Act.

30(f) The dissolution of redevelopment has spurred litigation
31between the city, which was the second largest redevelopment
32agency within the County of Santa Clara, as the state and county
33have sued the city for $55 million.

P3    1(g) The city desires tobegin delete settle its litigation with the state and the
2county,end delete
begin insert ensure the greatest amount of citizen participation to
3increase economic activity in the McCarthy Ranch area of the city
4near the Newby Island landfill in order toend insert
find new revenue sources
5to replace the funds, restore losses of firefighters and police
6officers, maintain and upgrade critical infrastructure, and generate
7employment and economic activity through previously approved
8private investment.

9

SEC. 2.  

Section 53083.2 is added to the Government Code, to
10read:

11

53083.2.  

begin deleteThe end deletebegin insert(a)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertOn or before April 1, 2015, the end insertCity of
12Milpitas may organize an independent localbegin delete agencyend deletebegin insert commissionend insert
13 to investigate and study the consequences of the dissolution of
14redevelopment on employment, revenues, and economic activity
15in order to identify and recommend ways to raise revenues to
16increase city staff to adequate levels, to invest in infrastructure
17and development projects, and tobegin delete settle claims against the city by
18the state and the County of Santa Clara.end delete
begin insert increase economic activity
19in the McCarthy Ranch area of the City of Milpitas near the Newby
20Island landfill.end insert

begin insert

21(b) The commission shall be composed of seven people
22appointed by the Milpitas City Council, as follows:

end insert
begin insert

23(1) One member of the business community who is also a
24member of the Milpitas Chamber of Commerce.

end insert
begin insert

25(2) One employee of the City of Milpitas Fire Department.

end insert
begin insert

26(3) One employee of the City of Milpitas Police Department.

end insert
begin insert

27(4) One member of a local union that is unaffiliated with public
28employee unions representing workers for the City of Milpitas.

end insert
begin insert

29(5) One owner of real property within the McCarthy Ranch area
30of the City of Milpitas near the Newby Island landfill.

end insert
begin insert

31(6) Two residents of the City of Milpitas.

end insert
begin insert

32(c) The city manager of the City of Milpitas shall be an ex officio
33member of the commission and report on the commission’s
34activities to the Milpitas City Council.

end insert
begin insert

35(d) The commission shall elect its own chairperson.

end insert
begin insert

36(e) Within one year of the City of Milpitas forming the
37commission, the commission’s authority shall cease.

end insert
begin insert

38(f) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2017,
39and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
40is enacted before January 1, 2017, deletes or extends that date.

end insert
P4    1

SEC. 3.  

The Legislature finds and declares that a special law
2is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable
3within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
4Constitution because of the unique circumstances in the City of
5Milpitas, where parcels on the west side of Interstate 880 and to
6the east of Coyote Creek in the McCarthy Ranch area of Milpitas
7near the Newby Island landfill, the San Francisco Bay area, and
8the regional water pollution control plant face particular challenges
9to economic development as a result of their restrictive location.



O

    98