Amended in Assembly April 24, 2014

Amended in Assembly April 1, 2014

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 2549


Introduced by Assembly Member Ridley-Thomas

February 21, 2014


An act to add and repeal Section 53083.2 of the Government Code, relating tobegin delete redevelopmentend deletebegin insert local governmentend insert.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 2549, as amended, Ridley-Thomas. begin deleteRedevelopment: end deleteCity of Milpitas.

begin delete

Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, dispose of all the assets of the former redevelopment agency, and remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller.

end delete
begin insert

Existing law declares that it is the policy of the state to protect and promote the sound development of economic opportunity in cities and counties, and the general welfare of the inhabitants of those communities through the employment of all appropriate means. Existing law requires each local agency, as defined to include a city, to provide specified information to the public before approving an economic development subsidy, as defined, within its jurisdiction, and to review, hold hearings, and report on those subsidies at specified intervals.

end insert

This bill would authorize the City of Milpitas, on or before April 1, 2015, to organize an independent local commission, composed of the city manager, as an ex officio member, and 7 specified members appointed by the Milpitas City Council, to investigate and studybegin delete the consequences of the dissolution of redevelopment onend deletebegin insert issues related toend insert employment, revenues, and economic activity in order to identify and recommend ways to raise revenues for specified purposes.

This bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2017.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Milpitas.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

begin delete

3(a) The dissolution of redevelopment by the state has been
4devastating in the City of Milpitas (city) and to its citizens.

end delete
begin delete

5(b) As a result of the dissolution of redevelopment, the city has
6lost $39 million in annual local tax revenues.

end delete
begin delete

7 7(c) The dissolution of redevelopment has

end delete

8begin insert(a)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertRecent losses of local funding haveend insert degraded public safety
9in thebegin delete cityend deletebegin insert City of Milpitas (city)end insert as the city has cut employment.
10Since the 2011-12 fiscal year, the city has laid off 110 employees,
11including 12 firefighters, and has been unable to fill 147 other
12positions that would otherwise had been filled, including 13 police
13officer positions.

begin delete

12 14(d) The dissolution of redevelopment

end delete

15begin insert(b)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertA lack of economic development toolsend insert has stopped investment
16in previously approved critical infrastructure in the city. Two
17hundred twenty million dollars worth of road, water, and sewer
18begin delete improvements located within the redevelopment project area,end delete
19begin insert improvements,end insert which had been approved in the capital
20improvement plan of the city, cannot be constructed. Other projects,
21including infrastructure projects have been delayed due to
22significant funding shortfalls in the city’s general fund to maintain
23streets.begin delete With the elimination of redevelopment, theend deletebegin insert Theend insert city’s
P3    1annual shortfall to maintain its Metropolitan Transit
2Commission-mandated Pavement Condition Index goal of 70 is
3$4 million per year.

begin delete

23 4(e) The dissolution of redevelopment

end delete

5begin insert(c)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertA lack of economic development toolsend insert has stopped previously
6approved development projects in the city, including a 120-room
7hotel and a low- and moderate-income senior housing project.
8With respect to the latter project, the project developer had agreed
9to employ 100 full-time medical and caregiver positions. Both
10projects had completed permits and land use reviews, including
11reviews under the California Environmental Quality Act.

begin delete

12(f) The dissolution of redevelopment has spurred litigation
13between the city, which was the second largest redevelopment
14agency within the County of Santa Clara, as the state and county
15have sued the city for $55 million.

end delete
begin delete

P3   1 16(g)

end delete

17begin insert(d)end insert The city desires to ensure the greatest amount of citizen
18participation to increase economic activity in the McCarthy Ranch
19area of the city near the Newby Island landfill in order to find new
20revenue sources to replace the funds, restore losses of firefighters
21and police officers, maintain and upgrade critical infrastructure,
22and generate employment and economic activity through previously
23approved private investment.

24

SEC. 2.  

Section 53083.2 is added to the Government Code, to
25read:

26

53083.2.  

(a) On or before April 1, 2015, the City of Milpitas
27may organize an independent local commission to investigate and
28studybegin delete the consequences of the dissolution of redevelopment onend delete
29begin insert issues related toend insert employment, revenues, and economic activity in
30order to identify and recommend ways to raise revenues to increase
31city staff to adequate levels, to invest in infrastructure and
32development projects, and to increase economic activity in the
33McCarthy Ranch area of the City of Milpitas near the Newby
34Island landfill.

35(b) The commission shall be composed of seven people
36appointed by the Milpitas City Council, as follows:

37(1) One member of the business community who is also a
38member of the Milpitas Chamber of Commerce.

39(2) One employee of the City of Milpitas Fire Department.

40(3) One employee of the City of Milpitas Police Department.

P4    1(4) One member of a local union that is unaffiliated with public
2employee unions representing workers for the City of Milpitas.

3(5) One owner of real property within the McCarthy Ranch area
4of the City of Milpitas near the Newby Island landfill.

5(6) Two residents of the City of Milpitas.

6(c) The city manager of the City of Milpitas shall be an ex
7officio member of the commission and report on the commission’s
8activities to the Milpitas City Council.

9(d) The commission shall elect its own chairperson.

10(e) Within one year of the City of Milpitas forming the
11commission, the commission’s authority shall cease.

12(f) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2017,
13and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that
14is enacted before January 1, 2017, deletes or extends that date.

15

SEC. 3.  

The Legislature finds and declares that a special law
16is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable
17within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
18Constitution because of the unique circumstances in the City of
19Milpitas, where parcels on the west side of Interstate 880 and to
20the east of Coyote Creek in the McCarthy Ranch area of Milpitas
21near the Newby Island landfill, the San Francisco Bay area, and
22the regional water pollution control plant face particular challenges
23to economic development as a result of their restrictive location.



O

    97