BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair
AB 2584 (Nestande) - Electricity: wind energy co-metering.
Amended: June 16, 2014 Policy Vote: EU&C 7-3
Urgency: No Mandate: No
Hearing Date: August 4, 2014 Consultant:
Marie Liu
This bill may meet the criteria for referral to the Suspense
File.
Bill Summary: AB 2584 would require Southern California Edison
(SCE) to interconnect a 1.5 MW wind turbine located at the
United States Marine Corp Logistics Base, Barstow.
Fiscal Impact: Unknown costs to the state as a ratepayer.
Background: Public Utilities Code �2827 requires that the
state's investor-owned utilities, publicly-owned utilities, and
other entities offering retail electric service, to credit all
electricity generated by a customer-owned renewable electric
generation facility against the customer's usage of electricity
sold by the utility, on a kilowatt hour basis (kWH), a procedure
known as "net energy metering" (NEM). An individual renewable
electric generation facility cannot produce more than is needed
by the customer's own electrical requirements, up to one
megawatt (MW). Under the NEM program, customers are exempt from
paying transmission and distribution costs.
Public Utilities Code ��2827 and 2827.8 defines "wind energy
co-metering" as a wind energy project greater than 50 kWh, but
not exceeding one MW, where electricity generated by the
eligible customer-generator and fed back to the grid is credited
against the electricity supplied to the eligible
customer-generator by the grid.
Proposed Law: This bill would raise the one MW limit to 1.5 MW
for a wind turbine located at the United States Marine Corp
Logistics Base, Barstow.
Staff Comments: Greater participation in wind energy co-metering
will result in cost-shifts to other ratepayers, including the
state, as the participants are exempt from a number of costs
AB 2584 (Nestande)
Page 1
such as non-bypassable charges. As the state is the customer for
approximately 1% of electricity users in SCE's territory, these
cost shifts are not likely to be significant.
In the area which the base is located, there is potentially
insufficient capacity on the transmission system. Should this
bill pass, the 1.5 MW wind turbine would add to any capacity
issues and would add cost pressures for infrastructure needs in
the area. These infrastructure costs are borne by all
electricity-users, including the state as a ratepayer. As
transmission infrastructure can have costs in the hundreds of
millions of dollars, the state's cost as a ratepayer can be in
the tens of thousands of dollars. However, this project would be
only one of several that necessitate the infrastructure
improvements. It is therefore unquantifiable which portion of
the transmission costs would be attributable to this bill.