AB 2618, as amended, John A. Pérez. Property and business improvement areas: benefit assessments.
The California Constitution generally requires that assessments, fees, and charges be submitted to property owners for approval or rejection after the provision of written notice and the holding of a public hearing.
The Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 authorizes cities to form property and business improvement districts that may levy assessments within a district for the purpose of making improvements and promoting activities of benefit to the properties and businesses within the district, and defines various terms for purposes of the act.
The act requires a management district plan to include, among other things, the name of the proposed district, a description of the boundaries of the district, and the total annual amount proposed to be expended for improvements, maintenance and operations, and debt service in each year of operation of the district.
This bill would require a management district plan to additionally include, for districts that are property-based, the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel, thebegin delete sumend deletebegin insert total amountend insert of all special benefits to bebegin delete provided toend deletebegin insert conferred onend insert the properties located within thebegin insert property-basedend insert district, thebegin delete sumend deletebegin insert
total amountend insert of any general benefitbegin delete being primarily provided to the public or any entity other than the properties located within the districtend delete, and a detailed engineer’s report, as specified.
This bill would define the term “special benefit” for purposes of that act to mean a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits, as defined, conferred on real property located in a property-based district, as defined,begin delete orend delete the public at largebegin insert, or other real propertyend insert, as specified.
The act additionally requires the city council to adopt a resolution of formation containing, among other things, a statement that the improvements and activities to be provided in the district will be funded by the levy of the assessments and a finding that the property or businesses within the area of the district will be benefited by the improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and activities funded by the assessments proposed to be levied.
This bill would require, for a property-based district, a statement of the source of funding to pay for any general benefits, a finding that the property within the district will receive a special benefit, thebegin delete sumend deletebegin insert total amountend insert of all special benefits to bebegin delete provided toend deletebegin insert
conferred onend insert the properties within thebegin insert
property-basedend insert district, and thebegin delete sumend deletebegin insert total amountend insert of any generalbegin delete benefit being primarily provided to the public or any entity other than the properties located within the districtend deletebegin insert benefitend insert.
The act authorizes a city council to levy assessments on businesses or on property owners, or a combination of the 2, and requires the city council to structure the assessments on whatever manner it determines corresponds with the distribution of benefits from the proposed improvements and activities.
This bill would require any property-based assessment to be proportional to the special benefit conferred on the assessed property, and would prohibit the assessment from exceeding the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred, as specified.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 36601 of the Streets and Highways Code
2 is amended to read:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
4(a) Businesses located and operating within business districts
5in some of this state’s communities are economically
6disadvantaged, are underutilized, and are unable to attract
7customers due to inadequate facilities, services, and activities in
8the business districts.
9(b) It is in the public interest to promote the economic
10revitalization and physical maintenance of the business districts
11of its cities in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and
12prevent the erosion of the business districts.
13(c) It is of particular local benefit to allowbegin delete citiesend deletebegin insert business
14districtsend insert to fund business related improvements, maintenance, and
15activities through the levy of assessments upon the businesses or
16real property that receive certain benefits from those improvements.
17(d) Assessments levied for thebegin delete purpose of providing begin insert specialend insert benefit
18improvements and promoting activities thatend delete
19begin insert conferred uponend insert real property or
businessesbegin insert in a business districtend insert
20 are not taxes for the general benefit of a city,begin delete but are assessments begin insert even if there is some incidental benefit
21for the improvements and activities which confer special benefits
22upon the real property or businesses for which the improvements
23and activities are provided.end delete
24to property or persons not assessed, from the improvements,
25maintenance, or activities that confer the special benefit.end insert
26(e) Property and business improvement districts formed
27throughout this state havebegin delete provided manyend deletebegin insert
conferred specialend insert benefits
28begin delete to this state’s communities that have resulted inend deletebegin insert on properties and
29businesses within their districts and have made assessed properties
30and businesses more useful by providingend insert the following benefits:
31(1) Crime reduction. A study by the Rand Corporation has
32confirmed a 12-percent reduction in the incidence of robbery and
33an 8-percent reduction in the total incidence of violent crimes
34within the 30 districts studied.
35(2) Job creation.
36(3) Business attraction.
37(4) Business retention.
38(5) Economic growth.
P4 1(6) New investments.
2(f) With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies throughout
3the state, property and business improvement districts have become
4begin deletean end deleteeven more importantbegin delete toolend deletebegin insert toolsend insert with whichbegin delete communities mayend delete
5begin insert toend insert
combat blight, promote economic opportunities, and create a
6clean and safe environment.
7(g) Since the enactment of this act, the people of California have
8adopted Proposition 218, which amended Article XIII D of the
9begin delete constitutionend deletebegin insert Constitutionend insert to place certain requirements and
10restrictions on the formation of, and activities, expenditures, and
11assessments by property-based districts. Article XIII D of the
12begin delete constitution requiresend deletebegin insert Constitution providesend insert that property-based
13districts may only levy
assessments for special benefits.
14(h) Various courts have considered how special benefits should
15be determined and assessed without guidance from the Legislature
16in regard to how the Legislature intends for the Property and
17Business Improvement District Law of 1994 to interact and comply
18with the provisions of Article XIII D of the Constitution and how
19special benefits are to be determined with regard to
property-based
20districts.
21(h) The act amending this section is intended to provide the
22Legislature’s guidance with regard to this act, its interaction with
23the provisions of Article XIII D of the Constitution, and the
24determination of special benefits in property-based districts.
25(1) The lack of legislative guidancebegin delete appears to have createdend deletebegin insert has
26resulted inend insert uncertaintybegin delete among various courts with regard to the begin insert
and inconsistent
27determination of special benefits, which could be perceived as
28providing an unclear or inconsistent standard.end delete
29application of this act, which discourages the use of assessments
30to fund needed improvements, maintenance, and activities in
31property-based districts, contributing to blight and other
32underutilization of property.end insert
33(2) Improvements, maintenance, or activities conferring special
34benefits upon property to be assessed also inevitably provide
35incidental, secondary, or collateral effects that benefit others not
36assessed. This incidental benefit is part of a special benefit and is
37not intended to generally benefit the public and, therefore, does
38not constitute a general benefit under Article XIII D of the
39Constitution.
16 40(2)
end delete
P5 1begin insert(3)end insert It is of utmost importance that property-based districts
2created underbegin delete theend delete this act have clarity regarding restrictions on
3assessments they may levy and the proper determination of special
4benefits. Legislative clarity with regard to this act will provide
5districts with clear instructions and courts with legislative intent
6regarding restrictions on property-based assessments, and the
7manner in which special benefits should be determined.
8(3) Of the appellate cases in which this act has been interpreted
9Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property and Business Improvement
10District (2009) 174 Cal. App. 4th 708, most squarely relates to
11property-based districts and its ruling provides clarity with regard
12to how special benefits are determined and assessed with regard
13to those districts.
14(i) It is the intent of the Legislature that this act should reflect
15the provisions of
Article XIII D of the Constitution and the
16guidance regarding the application of those provisions set forth in
17Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property and Business Improvement
18District (2009) 174 Cal. App. 4th 708 including the
manner in
19which special benefits should be determined.
Section 36602 of the Streets and Highways Code is
21amended to read:
The purpose of this part is to supplement previously
23enacted provisions of law that authorize cities to levy assessments
24within a property and business improvement district, tobegin delete assureend delete
25begin insert ensureend insert that those assessments conform to all constitutional
26requirements and are determined and assessed in accordance with
27the guidance set forth inbegin delete Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property
28and Business Improvement District (2009) 174Cal. App.4th 708end delete
29begin insert
this actend insert. This part does not affect or limit any other provisions of
30law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements
31or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes.
begin insertSection 36603.5 of the end insertbegin insertStreets and Highways Codeend insertbegin insert is
33amended to read:end insert
Any provisionbegin delete inend deletebegin insert ofend insert this part that conflicts with any
35other provision of law shall prevail over the other provision of
36lawbegin insert, as to districts created under this partend insert.
Section 36606 of the Streets and Highways Code is
39amended and renumbered to read:
“Assessment” means a levybegin delete or chargeend delete for the purpose
2of acquiring, constructing, installing, or maintaining improvements
3and promoting activities that will provide certain benefits to
4properties or businesses located within a property and business
5improvement district.
Section 36609.5 is added to the Streets and Highways
8Code, to read:
“General benefit” meansbegin insert, for purposes of a
10property-based district,end insert any benefitbegin delete being primarilyend delete provided to
11the publicbegin insert at largeend insert or anybegin delete entityend deletebegin insert person or propertyend insert other than the
12propertiesbegin delete or businessesend delete
located within the property-based district.
13begin delete A general benefit does not include a collateral benefit that arises begin insert “General
14incidentally from a special benefit conferred on the properties or
15businesses located within the property-based districtend delete
16benefit” excludes all types and components of a “special benefit”
17as defined in Section 36615.5end insert.
Section 36611 of the Streets and Highways Code is
20amended and renumbered to read:
“Property and business improvement district,” or
22“district,” means a property and business improvement district
23established pursuant to this part.
Section 36612 of the Streets and Highways Code is
26amended and renumbered to read:
“Property” means real property situated within a district.
Section 36613 of the Streets and Highways Code is
30amended and renumbered to read:
“Activities” means, but is not limited to, all of the
32followingbegin insert that benefit businesses or real property in the districtend insert:
33(a) Promotion of publicbegin delete events which benefit businesses or real begin insert events.end insert
34property in the district.end delete
35(b) Furnishing of music in any publicbegin delete place within the districtend delete
36begin insert
placeend insert.
37(c) Promotion of tourism within the district.
38(d) Marketing and economic development, including retail
39retention and recruitment.
P7 1(e) Providing security, sanitation, graffiti removal, street and
2sidewalk cleaning, and other municipal services supplemental to
3those normally provided by the municipality.
4(f) begin deleteActivities which end deletebegin insertOther services that end insertbenefit businesses and
5real property located in the district.
Section 36614 of the Streets and Highways Code is
8amended and renumbered to read:
“Management district plan” or “plan” means a proposal
10as defined in Section 36622.
Section 36614.5 of the Streets and Highways Code
13 is amended and renumbered to read:
“Owners’ association” means a private nonprofit entity
15that is under contract with a city to administer or implement
16activities and improvements specified in the management district
17plan. An owners’ association may be an existing nonprofit entity
18or a newly formed nonprofit entity. An owners’ association is a
19private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any
20purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be
21public officials for any purpose. Notwithstanding this section, an
22owners’ association shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act
23(Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division
242 of Title 5 of the Government Code), at all times when matters
25within the subject matter of the
district are heard, discussed, or
26deliberated, and with the California Public Records Act (Chapter
273.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of
28the Government Code), for allbegin delete documentsend deletebegin insert recordsend insert relating to
29activities of the district.
Section 36614.6 is added to the Streets and Highways
32Code, to read:
“Property-based assessment” means anybegin delete levy or begin insert assessment made pursuant to this partend insert upon
34chargeend deletebegin delete real property begin insert propertyend insert.
35by a cityend delete
Section 36614.7 is added to the Streets and Highways
38Code, to read:
“Property-based district” means any districtbegin delete supportedend delete
40 inbegin delete part by anyend deletebegin insert which a city levies aend insert property-based assessment.
Section 36615.5 is added to the Streets and Highways
3Code, to read:
“Special benefit” meansbegin insert, for purposes of a
5property-based district,end insert a particular and distinct benefit over and
6above general benefits conferred on real property located in a
7property-based districtbegin delete orend deletebegin insert,end insert to the public atbegin delete large. Generalend deletebegin insert large, or
8to other real property from the improvements, maintenance, or
9activities of a property-based district and the
incidental secondary
10or collateral benefit from those improvements, maintenance, or
11activities. “Special benefit” excludes generalend insert enhancement of
12property valuebegin delete does not constitute “special benefit.” To the extent begin insert and any “general benefit” as defined in
13a special benefit concomitantly produces a collateral benefit for
14properties generally or for the public at large, that collateral benefit
15is not a general benefitend delete
16Section 36609.5end insert.
Section 36622 of the Streets and Highways Code is
19amended to read:
The management district plan shallbegin delete containend deletebegin insert include,
21but is not limited to,end insert all of the following:
22(a) If the assessment will be levied on property, a map of the
23district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and, if
24businesses are to be assessed, each business within the district. If
25the assessment will be levied on businesses, a map that identifies
26the district boundaries in sufficient detail to allow a business owner
27to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the
28district boundaries. If the assessment
will be levied on property
29and businesses, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate
30each parcel of property and to allow a business owner to reasonably
31determine whether a business is located within the district
32boundaries.
33(b) The name of the proposed district.
34(c) A description of the boundaries of the district, including the
35boundaries of benefit zones, proposed for establishment or
36extension in a manner sufficient to identify the affected lands and
37businesses included. The boundaries of a proposed property
38assessment district shall not overlap with the boundaries of another
39existing property assessment district created pursuant to this part.
40This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a district created
P9 1pursuant to this part to overlap with other assessment
districts
2established pursuant to other provisions of law, including, but not
3limited to, the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of
41989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500)). This part does
5not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created
6pursuant to this part to overlap with another business assessment
7district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit
8the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant
9to this part to overlap with a property assessment district created
10pursuant to this part.
11(d) The improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and activities proposed
12for each year of operation of the district and the maximum cost
13thereof. If the improvementsbegin insert,
maintenance,end insert and activities proposed
14for each year of operation are the same, a description of the first
15year’s proposed improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and activities and a
16statement that the same improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and activities
17are proposed for subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements
18of this subdivision.
19(e) The total annual amount proposed to be expended for
20improvements, maintenancebegin delete and operationsend deletebegin insert, or activitiesend insert, and debt
21service in each year of
operation of the district. If the assessment
22is levied on businesses, this amount may be estimated based upon
23the assessment rate. If the total annual amount proposed to be
24expended in each year of operation of the district is not
25significantly different, the amount proposed to be expended in the
26initial year and a statement that a similar amount applies to
27subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
28(f) The proposed source or sources of financing, including the
29proposed method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient
30detail to allow each property or business owner to calculate the
31amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property
32or business. The plan also shall state whether bonds will be issued
33to finance improvements.
34(g) The time and manner of collecting the assessments.
35(h) The specific number of years in which assessments will be
36levied. In a new district, the maximum number of years shall be
37five. Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10
38years. Notwithstanding these limitations, a district created pursuant
39to this part to finance capital improvements with bonds may levy
40assessments until the maximum maturity of the bonds. The
P10 1management district plan may set forth specific increases in
2assessments for each year of operation of the district.
3(i) The proposed time for implementation and completion of
4the management district plan.
5(j) Any proposed rules and regulations to be applicable to the
6district.
7(k) (1) A list of the properties or businesses to be assessed,
8including the assessor’s parcel numbers for properties to be
9assessed, and a statement of the method or methods by which the
10expenses of a district will be imposed upon benefited real property
11or businesses, in proportion to the benefit received by the property
12or business, to defray the cost thereof, including operation and
13maintenance.
14(2) In a property-based district, the proportionate special benefit
15derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship
16to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the
17maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or
18the cost of thebegin delete property related service being providedend deletebegin insert
activitiesend insert.
19An assessment shall not be imposed on any parcel that exceeds
20the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred
21on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and a
22property-based district shall separate the general benefits from the
23special benefits conferred on a parcel. Parcels within a
24property-based district that are owned or used by any city, public
25agency, the State of California, or the United States shall not be
26exempt from assessment unless the governmental entity can
27demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly
28owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.
29(l) In a property-based district, the sum of all special benefits
30to be provided to the properties located within the property-based
31district.
32(m) In a property-based district, thebegin delete sumend deletebegin insert
total amountend insert ofbegin delete any begin insert all special benefits to be conferred on the
33general benefit being primarily provided to the public or any entity
34other than the properties located within the district. A general
35benefit does not include any collateral benefit that arises
36incidentally from the provision of a special benefit to properties
37located within the property-based district, and the amount of those
38collateral benefits need not be deducted from the sum of special
39benefits to be provided to the properties located within the
P11 1property-based district.end delete
2properties in the property-based districtend insertbegin insert.end insert
3(n) In a property-based district, the total amount of any general
4benefit.
32 5(n)
end delete
6begin insert(o)end insert In a property-based district, a detailed engineer’s report
7prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the
8State of California supporting all assessments contemplated by the
9management district plan.
37 10(3)
end delete
11begin insert(p)end insert Any other item or matter required to be incorporated therein
12by the city council.
Section 36625 of the Streets and Highways Code is
15amended to read:
(a) If the city council, following the public hearing,
17decides to establishbegin delete theend deletebegin insert aend insert proposed property and business
18improvement district, the city council shall adopt a resolution of
19formation that shallbegin delete containend deletebegin insert include, but is not limited to,end insert all of the
20following:
21(1) A brief description of the proposedbegin delete activities andend delete
22
improvements,begin insert
maintenance, and activities,end insert the amount of the
23proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment
24will be levied on property, businesses, or both within the district,
25a statementbegin delete aboutend deletebegin insert onend insert whether bonds will be issued, and a
26description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district. The
27descriptions and statementsbegin delete do notend delete needbegin delete toend deletebegin insert notend insert be detailed and shall
28be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature
29and extent of the
improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and activities and
30the location and extent of the proposed district.
31(2) The number, date of adoption, and title of the resolution of
32intention.
33(3) The time and place where the public hearing was held
34concerning the establishment of the district.
35(4) A determination regarding any protests received. The city
36shall not establish the district or levy assessments if a majority
37protest was received.
38(5) A statement that the properties, businesses, or properties
39and businesses in the district established by the resolution shall be
40subject
to any amendments to this part.
P12 1(6) A statement that the improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and
2activities to bebegin delete provided inend deletebegin insert conferred onend insert the district will be funded
3by the levy of the assessments, and, for a property-based district,
4to the extent that general benefits are provided, thebegin delete source ofend delete
5 fundingbegin delete to payend deletebegin insert
sourceend insert for those general benefits. The revenue from
6the levy of assessments within a district shall not be used to provide
7improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert or activities outside the district or
8for any purpose other than the purposes specified in the resolution
9of intention, as modified by the city council at the hearing
10concerning establishment of the district.
11(7) A finding that the property or businesses within the area of
12the property and business improvement district will be benefited
13by the improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and activities funded by the
14begin delete assessments proposed to be leviedend deletebegin insert
proposed assessmentsend insert, and, for
15a property-based district, that property within the district will
16receive a special benefit.
17(8) In a property-based district, thebegin delete sum of all special benefits begin insert total amount of all special benefits to be conferred
18to be provided toend delete
19onend insert the properties within the property-based district.
20(9) In a property-based district, the sum of any generalbegin delete benefit
21being primarily provided to the public or any entity other than the
22properties located within the property-based district. General
23benefits do not include collateral benefits that arise incidentally
24from the provision of special benefits to the properties located
25within the property-based district, and the amount of those
26collateral benefits need not be deducted from the sum of special
27benefits to be provided to the properties located within the
28
property-based district.end delete
29(b) The adoption of the resolution of formation and, if required,
30recordation of the notice and map pursuant to Section 36627 shall
31constitute the levy of an assessment in each of the fiscal years
32referred to in the management district plan.
Section 36628.5 of the Streets and Highways Code
35 is amended to read:
The city council may levy assessments on businesses
37or on property owners, or a combination of the two, pursuant to
38this part. The city council shall structure the assessments in
39whatever manner it determines corresponds with the distribution
40of benefits from the proposed improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and
P13 1activities, provided that any property-based assessment is
2proportional to the special benefit conferred on the assessed
3property.
Section 36632 of the Streets and Highways Code is
6amended to read:
(a) The assessments levied on real property pursuant
8to this part shall be levied proportionallybegin delete withend deletebegin insert toend insert thebegin delete distribution special benefit
9of aend deletebegin delete toend deletebegin insert conferred onend insert the real property, and shall not
10exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit
11conferred on the real property. Any additional
costs of providing
12general benefits shall not be included in the amounts assessed.
13begin delete However, a general benefit does not include collateral benefits
14that arise incidentally from special benefits conferred on the
15properties or businesses located within the property-based district. end delete
16The city council may classify properties for purposes of
17determining the special benefitbegin delete provided toend deletebegin insert conferred onend insert property
18by the improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and activitiesbegin delete providedend delete
19begin insert
cend insertbegin insertonferredend insert pursuant to this part.
20(b) Assessments levied on businesses pursuant to this part shall
21be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the businesses
22within the property and business improvement district. The city
23council may classify businesses for purposes of determining the
24benefit to the businesses of the improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert and
25activitiesbegin delete providedend deletebegin insert conferredend insert pursuant to this part.
26(c) Properties zonedbegin delete solelyend delete
forbegin delete residential use, or that are zoned agricultural use, are
27forend deletebegin delete conclusivelyend delete presumed not tobegin insert receive
28specialend insert benefit from the improvementsbegin insert, maintenance,end insert andbegin delete serviceend delete
29begin insert activitiesend insert funded through these assessments, and shall not be subject
30to any assessment pursuant to this part.
O
98