BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                                                                  AB 2632
                                                                  Page A
          Date of Hearing:   April 29, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
                                  Mark Stone, Chair
                 AB 2632 (Maienschein) - As Amended:  March 28, 2014
           
          SUBJECT  :  Care facilities: criminal background clearances

           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits the Department of Social Services (DSS) from  
          providing a criminal record clearance for a person applying for  
          employment in a Community Care Facility (CCF), Residential Care  
          Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), and Child Day Care Facilities  
          (CDCF) with a record of an arrest prior to the completion of an  
          evaluation of the person's arrest record for employment. 

           EXISTING LAW   

          1)Establishes the California Community Care Facilities Act  
            (CCFA) to provide a comprehensive statewide service system of  
            quality community care for people who have a mental illness, a  
            developmental or physical disability, and children and adults  
            who require care or services by a facility or organization.   
            (H&S Code 1500 and 1501)

          2)Defines a CCF as a facility, place, or building maintained and  
            operated to provide nonmedical residential care, day  
            treatment, adult day care, or foster family agency services  
            for children, adults, or children and adults, including, but  
            not limited to, the physically handicapped, mentally impaired,  
            incompetent persons, and abused or neglected children.  (H&S  
            Code 1502)

          3)Establishes the California RCFE Act, which requires facilities  
            that provide personal care and supervision, protective  
            supervision or health related services for persons 60 years of  
            age or older who voluntarily choose to reside in those  
            facilities to be licensed by DSS.  (H&S Code 1569 and 1569.1)

          4)Establishes the California CDCFA to provide a comprehensive,  
            quality system for licensing child day care facilities to  
            ensure that working families have access to healthy and safe  
            child care providers and that child care programs contribute  
            positively to a child's emotional, cognitive, and educational  
            development, and are able to respond to and provide for the  
            unique characteristics and needs of children.  (H&S Code  









                                                                  AB 2632
                                                                  Page B
            1596.70 and 1596.72)

          5)Requires applicants to undergo a state and federal criminal  
            background check prior to employment in a licensed CCF, RCFE,  
            or CDCF and requires DSS to deny the applicant eligibility for  
            employment if it finds that the applicant has been convicted  
            of a serious or otherwise violent or heinous, as specified.   
            (H&S Codes 1522(b), 1568.09(b), 1569.17(b), and 1596.871(b))

          6)Prohibits DSS from using any record of arrest to deny, revoke,  
            or terminate any application, license, employment, or  
            residence unless DSS investigates the incident that led to the  
            arrest and obtains evidence, as specified, that indicates the  
            person may post a risk to the health and safety of the person  
            for whom they would be providing care.  (H&S Codes 1522(e),  
            1568.09(e), 1569.17(e), and 1596.871(e))

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :    

           DSS Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD)  :  Initially  
          administered by the Department of Health upon its establishment  
          in 1973, the CCFA became the jurisdiction the Health and Human  
          Services Agency, under which a number of departments were  
          placed, including the Departments of Social Services and Health  
          Services.  Under today's structure, the responsibility for the  
          licensing of community care facilities sits with DSS, and the  
          duty to license health care facilities is with the Department of  
          Health Care Services (DHCS).  

          Facilities licensed by CCLD typically provide non-medical care  
          and supervision for children and adults in need, which includes  
          persons with disabilities, seniors in need of residential care,  
          children in foster care and at-risk children needing shelter  
          services, families in need of early childhood education (child  
          care), and adult care services.  CCLD is responsible for the  
          licensing of all care facilities, including conducting criminal  
          background check reviews and clearances, and for investigating  
          all complaints against facilities.  

          According to DSS, as of April 1, 2014 there are 76,603 licensed  
          facilities in the state, with a licensed capacity of 1,395,275  
          individuals. 










                                                                  AB 2632
                                                                  Page C
           Consideration of convictions and arrests  :  Under current law, a  
          person who wishes to be employed by a care facility must undergo  
          a state and federal criminal background check.  This requires  
          applicants to submit their fingerprints in order to discover  
          whether they have any convictions that may preclude them from  
          working in care facilities, which serve some of California's  
          most vulnerable populations, such as foster youth, the elderly,  
          and the disabled.  If it is discovered that a person has been  
          convicted of a crime, other than a minor traffic violation, the  
          applicant cannot receive a criminal background clearance from  
          DSS until a further investigation is conducted.  If it is  
          discovered that an individual has been convicted of a  
          non-exemptible crime, such as rape, a sex offense, murder, or  
          fiscal malfeasance, then a criminal background clearance cannot  
          be provided.

          Additionally, a person's arrest record is permitted to be taken  
          into account.  However, current law specifically forbids an  
          arrest record from being used to deny or terminate a prospective  
          or current employee or licensee.  Still, DSS may use an  
          incidence of arrest as reason to conduct a further investigation  
          into the applicant's background to determine whether the  
          individual may pose a threat to the health and safety of clients  
          or residents of a care facility.  In conducting the  
          investigation, DSS is required to obtain information relating to  
          the nature and cause of the arrest and any other information or  
          evidence that may be used in an administrative hearing to make  
          the determination that the individual does or does not pose a  
          threat.  This results in DSS having to acquire arrest record  
          information from the responsible law enforcement agency.  For  
          applicants who have been arrested in other states, this can  
          result in time consuming and labor intensive investigative  
          efforts to track down the arrest record in a local jurisdiction  
          out of state. 

           Changing DSS policy on arrest clearances  :  Prior to 2011,  
          pursuant to its statutory authority to consider arrest records,  
          DSS conducted applicant reviews for individuals who had an  
          arrest for a non-exemptible crime.  However, in 2011, in  
          response to delays in conducting timely reviews of applicants  
          with an arrest record, which can take anywhere from several  
          weeks to more than six months, DSS changed its policy to clear  
          all individuals who have arrests, but not convictions on their  
          record. 










                                                                  AB 2632
                                                                  Page D
          In early 2014, in response to this change in policy, a DSS  
          licensing analyst reported to the media that he or she provided   
          clearances to individuals "who were arrested for assault and  
          battery, attempted murder, robbery, kidnapping, things like  
          arson [and] child abuse."<1>  This caused concern that DSS was  
          not properly implementing its authority under current law.  As a  
          result, DSS changed its policy again, but this time to conduct a  
          review of applicants who have an arrest for a "referable"  
          alleged crime.  However, it is unclear what is considered a  
          "referable" versus "non-referable" alleged crime.  For referable  
          arrests, DSS's Investigative Bureau, which handles  
          investigations into criminal background checks, and its Legal  
          Counsel conduct a multi-tiered review, which could take anywhere  
          from five days to several months depending on how much  
          information is needed to evaluate a referable arrest. 

           Need for the bill  :  Stating the need for the bill, the author  
          writes: 

               This legislative fix is necessary to ensure that the State  
               of California upholds its responsibility to adequately  
               protect Californians from the threat of potentially  
               dangerous individuals gaining employment in DSS-licensed  
               care facilities.  The government should apply the highest  
               standard of care when dealing with our most vulnerable  
               populations, and this bill clarifies that each and every  
               DSS applicant's arrest record be investigated in a diligent  
               and timely manner before the applicant is allowed to gain  
               employment caring for those most at risk for abuse and  
               exploitation.

          Writing in support of the bill as the sponsor, the Children's  
          Advocacy Institute states:

               California has a moral and legal obligation to protect our  
               foster youth who, by force of law, we have removed from  
               their own homes and for whose well-being and safety we have  
               taken responsibility.  [This bill] would protect  
               California's foster youth, and other vulnerable  
               populations, by amending applicable sections of California  
               Health and Safety Code.  This bill clarifies that when an  
               individual applies for employment in a DSS-licensed care  

               -------------------------
          <1>  
           http://www.kcra.com/news/state-clears-daycare-nursing-home-worker 
          s-before-background-checks/24697902  








                                                                  AB 2632
                                                                  Page E
               facility, no criminal record clearance shall be issued to  
               an applicant with an arrest record prior to completion of a  
               complete background investigation.

           Opposition  :  Writing in opposition to the bill, the Youth Law  
          Center states:

               The proposed amendments apply to all arrests, regardless of  
               the date of the arrest or the seriousness of the alleged  
               offense.  They do not define what investigation is required  
               or impose any timelines for the investigation.  Current  
               Community Care Licensing policies include detailed  
               instructions for processing background checks when records  
               indicate an arrest with no conviction.  (California  
               Department of Social Services, Evaluator Manual ��7- 1535  
               through 1550)  These procedures recognize that arrest  
               records can indicate a wide variety of circumstances from  
               arrests for minor offenses that were never prosecuted to  
               pending allegations of serious crimes.  The Manual defines  
               which arrests do not need to be investigated, which may be  
               investigated, and which must be investigated.

               The social worker and the court are in the best position to  
               determine whether a placement is appropriate for a  
               particular child, but this amendment would delay  
               consideration of a placement pending investigation of any  
               arrest record, even when the relative caregiver, or someone  
               else living in the home, has a record of an arrest for a  
               minor offense that occurred years ago.

           Staff comments  :  This measure seeks to help resolve what has  
          been a back-and-forth state policy on how to take into  
          consideration an arrest record of a person applying for  
          employment in a care facility.  However, by providing a blanket  
          requirement that every person shall undergo a full investigative  
          review, regardless of the nature of the arrest or when the  
          arrest occurred, would unfairly limit employment to anyone who  
          has been arrested and is seeking to help serve clients or  
          residents of a care facility. 

           RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS:  

          Rather than provide a blanket application, accommodation should  
          be considered for those whose arrests have been resolved or  
          whose arrests are not pending and do not involve a  









                                                                  AB 2632
                                                                  Page F
          non-exemptible crime.  Specifically, an individual whose arrest  
          for a non-exemptible crime is still undergoing adjudication  
          should be taken into account because the investigation and  
          potential legal charges are being pursued through the judicial  
          process. 

          Committee staff recommends deleting the current language in the  
          bill and replacing it with language requiring DSS to conduct an  
          investigative review of pending arrests related to allegations  
          of a non-exemptible crime.  Non-exemptible crimes would be those  
          specified in Section 1522(a) of the Health and Safety Code.

          It should be noted that this amendment would not change DSS'  
          current authority to conduct investigations of individuals with  
          arrest records.  It would only clarify that a person with an  
          arrest for an alleged non-exemptible crime could not be provided  
          a clearance without further investigation. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          The Arc 
          United Cerebral Palsy 
          Children Advocacy Institute (CAI) 

           Opposition 
           
          American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) 
          Youth Law Center 
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Chris Reefe / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089