BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 2646
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2646 (Ting)
          As Amended March 28, 2014
          Majority vote 

           JUDICIARY           9-0                                         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Wieckowski, Wagner,       |     |                          |
          |     |Alejo, Chau, Dickinson,   |     |                          |
          |     |Garcia, Maienschein,      |     |                          |
          |     |Muratsuchi, Stone         |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Clarifies the prohibition against discrimination in  
          the exercise of peremptory challenges to jurors.  Specifically,  
           this bill  provides that a party may not use a peremptory  
          challenge to remove a prospective juror on the basis of an  
          assumption that the prospective juror is biased merely because  
          of any characteristic listed or defined in Government Code  
          Section 11135(a), or similar grounds.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides that no eligible person shall be exempt from service  
            as a trial juror by reason of occupation, economic status, or  
            any characteristic listed or defined in Government Code  
            Section 11135, or for any other reason.  

          2)Provides that a party may not use a peremptory challenge to  
            remove a prospective juror on the basis of an assumption that  
            the prospective juror is biased merely because of his or her  
            race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual  
            orientation, or similar grounds.

          3)Prohibits discrimination by the state and state-funded  
            entities in all programs or activities with respect to race,  
            national origin, ethnic group identification, religion, age,  
            sex, sexual orientation, color, genetic information, or  
            disability.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  None









                                                                  AB 2646
                                                                  Page  2


           COMMENTS  :  The author explains the reason for the bill as  
          follows:

               Section 204 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP)  
               provides that no eligible person shall be exempt from  
               jury service by reason of occupation, economic status,  
               or any characteristic listed or defined in Section  
               11135 of the Government Code - the code section that  
               states "no person in the State of California shall, on  
               the basis of race, national origin, ethnic group  
               identification, religion, age, sex, sexual  
               orientation, color, genetic information, or  
               disability" be discriminated against by the state.   
               Section 11135 of the Government Code applies to all  
               programs or activities conducted, operated,  
               administered, or funded (either wholly or partially)  
               by the state.
                                                 
               Section 231.5 of the CCP provides that an individual  
               may not be removed from jury service based on an  
               assumption that the prospective juror is biased merely  
               because of his or her race, color, religion, sex,  
               national origin, sexual orientation, or similar  
               grounds.  In order to provide conformity in law, AB  
               2646 similarly cross-references Section 11135 of the  
               Government Code to this code section instead of  
               listing all the specific characteristics that apply.  

          As the author explains, existing law sets forth a representative  
          list of characteristics on which peremptory challenges to jurors  
          may not be based.  That list has not been updated to reflect  
          changes in the state's general non-discrimination statute,  
          Government Code Section 11135, which arguably governs peremptory  
          challenges by prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race,  
          national origin, ethnic group identification, religion, age,  
          sex, sexual orientation, color, genetic information, or  
          disability in any program or activity that is conducted,  
          operated, or administered by the state or by any state agency,  
          is funded directly by the state, or receives any financial  
          assistance from the state.  

          While the existing catch-all provision prohibiting  
          discrimination on "similar grounds" might be interpreted to  
          cover all characteristics within Government Code Section 11135,  








                                                                  AB 2646
                                                                  Page  3


          this bill would make the point explicit and therefore give  
          potentially helpful guidance to courts, parties and their  
          counsel.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Kevin G. Baker / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 


                                                                FN: 0003321