BILL ANALYSIS �
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair
AB 2649 (Mullin) - Public utilities: military installations:
independent generation facilities.
Amended: June 30, 2014 Policy Vote: EU&C 10-0
Urgency: No Mandate: Yes (see staff comment)
Hearing Date: August 4, 2014 Consultant:
Marie Liu
This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
Bill Summary: AB 2649 would require the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC) to determine criteria, by April 1,
2015, that would allow certain renewable generation resources on
specified military installations to apply for expedited review
of its interconnection application.
Fiscal Impact: One-time costs of $216,000 from the Public
Utilities Reimbursement Account (special) for additional staff
time to develop the required criteria.
Background: Electric Rule 21 of the CPUC establishes
distribution interconnection rules for net metering, nonexport
self-generation, and wholesale distribution access tariff. All
customer generators, except those eligible for NEM, that
interconnect to the distribution grid, regardless of whether or
not the generator would be exporting to the grid, require an
interconnection application and $800 application fee. Non-export
generators are eligible for a "Fast Track" review, which does
not require an application fee, but if the application does not
pass the Fast Track review, the IOU may require a supplemental
review and a review fee of $2,500.
Proposed Law: This bill would require the CPUC to determine
criteria that would allow an independent generation facility to
apply for interconnection under the Fast Track review process.
An "independent generation facility" would be defined as a
renewable generation resource on specified military
installations that does not export electricity to the California
electrical distribution grid.
AB 2649 (Mullin)
Page 1
Staff Comments: The development of a new interconnection Fast
Track process as required by this bill would not necessarily
necessitate a new proceeding because the criteria might be able
to be developed within an existing open proceeding regarding
interconnection (R 11-09-011). However, the CPUC would still
incur one-time costs of $216,000 of additional staff time to
perform the necessary work within the existing proceeding.
Because existing law makes a violation of a CPUC order, rule,
direction, demand, or requirement a crime, this bill creates
state-mandated local program by creating a new CPUC requirement.
However, under the state constitution, costs associated with the
creation or modification of a crime is not reimbursable.